Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02

2022-12-08 Thread peng.shaofu
Support as a co-author, color is a useful term for TE purpose during PCEP signal, whether it is used in the traditional RSVP-TE tunnel or the current SR policy. Regards, PSF Original From: DhruvDhody To: pce@ietf.org ; Cc: draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-co...@ietf.org ; Date:

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02

2022-12-08 Thread peng.shaofu
Hi, I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. Regards, PSF Original From: HariharanAnanthakrishnan To: 彭少富10053815;bala...@juniper.net ;vbee...@juniper.net ;Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ;熊泉00091065;gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02

2022-12-08 Thread Kaliraj Vairavakkalai
I support adoption of this draft. I think carrying Color for RSVP-TE tunnels in PCEP is an important and useful addition. One comment: It would be good to get the IANA code-points allotted, to facilitate implementations. Thanks, Kaliraj From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody Date: Thursday, 1

[Pce] IPR Disclosure ZTE Corporation's Statement about IPR related to draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color

2022-12-08 Thread IETF Secretariat
Dear Balaji Rajagopalan, Vishnu Pavan Beeram, Shaofu Peng, Quan Xiong, Mike Koldychev, Gyan Mishra: An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "Path Computation Element Protocol(PCEP) Extension for Color" (draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color) was submitted to the IETF