Thanks Quan,
Ack, Iām fine with your proposals + see inline (I skipped most of them as
you already responded and there was not much to discuss š ).
Regards,
Samuel
From: xiong.q...@zte.com.cn
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2024 3:23 AM
To: Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; d...@dhru
Hi Samuel,
Thanks for your reply!
I am glad that most of your comments are addressed.
The reason why I use the "SHOULD" is that "MUST" may be too strong which
mentioned by Andrew's comment.
I think it may be better to add PCErr message associated with "MUST" in case
the PCE can not set it.
So I
Thanks Quan,
Makes sense now, then please use version, which you proposed in your previous
mail.
Regards,
Samuel
From: xiong.q...@zte.com.cn
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:02 PM
To: Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; d...@dhruvdhody.com;
draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@
