Re: [Pce] Quick Poll on PCE Rechartering

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jean Philippe Vasseur (jvasseur) > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:33 AM > To: pce@ietf.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Pce] Quick Poll on PCE Rechartering > > Dear WG, > > We discussed abou

Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds

> > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > > Adrian Farrel > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:40 PM > > To: pce@ietf.org > > Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds > > > > Hi, > > > > Following up some actions from Dublin... > > > > C

Re: [Pce] Poll ondraft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-07

Support (I am one of the authors). Thanks Regards ... Zafar > -Original Message- > From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Julien > Meuric > Sent: 22 August 2011 10:27 > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Poll on draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-pro

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-00

Hi Margaria: Sorry for delayed response. Please see in-line. Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: , "cyril.marga...@nsn.com" Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:44 AM To: "draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-...@tools.ietf.org" , "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Comments on draft

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes, support (as a co-author). Thanks Regards … Zafar From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" mailto:jvass...@cisco.com>> Date: Monday, March 11, 2013 4:13 PM To: "pce@ietf.org" mailto:pce@ietf.org>> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE Capability discovery draft: request for review & adoption as a WG document

Hi- I agree. Indeed a much needed draft. Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: Ina Minei Date: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 12:08 PM To: "Jan Medved (jmedved)" , "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE Capability discovery draft: request for review & adoption as a WG do

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-00

-Original Message- From: zali Date: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:18 PM To: "cyril.marga...@nsn.com" , "draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-...@tools.ietf.org" , "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Comments on draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-00 >>I think the document has good material, but

Re: [Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures

>A response from each of you is expected. Julien, all I am not aware of any IPR in this regard. Thanks Regards Š Zafar ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

Hi- Yes, I see a need for applicability doc. Thanks Regards … Zafar From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" mailto:jvass...@cisco.com>> Date: Saturday, June 22, 2013 4:19 AM To: Ina Minei mailto:i...@juniper.net>>, "pce@ietf.org" mailto:pce@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE

Re: [Pce] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dhody-pce-srlg-collection-00.txt

Hi Dhruv: Why cannot PCC use RSVP-TE signaling recording to collect the SRLG of a path (using draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect)? Please note that SRLG recording is NOT part of path computation service. My worry is that we are duplicating RSVP-TE functionality into PCE without noticing tha

Re: [Pce] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dhody-pce-srlg-collection-00.txt

than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! From: pce-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org> [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zafar Ali (zali) Sent: 10 October 2

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-00

Dear Margaria and the WG: We received the following and other comments to divide this document. > >I think the document has good material, but address several separated >points : >1. Active Stateful PCE Applicability >2. MPLS multi-layer aspects >3. GMPLS (GENERALIZED-BW and SWITC

Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03

Support! Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: "julien.meu...@orange.com" Organization: Orange Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:14 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 >Hi all. > >Following the opposition express

Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03

Support (as a co-author) Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: "julien.meu...@orange.com" Organization: Orange Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:17 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03 >Hi again. > >Follo

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt

Dear Cyril and the WG: Please note that in the latest version of the draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt, we have addressed all comments received. Please advise of any additional comments. Thanks Regards Š Zafar (on Behalf of co-authors). -Original Message- From: "internet-

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Hi- Support (as a co-author). Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 5:51 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ? >Dear WG, > >As discussed

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Hi Loa: Thanks for the support. Yes, it fills in support for "G"-mpls gaps in draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp, including LSPs for switching types listed by you. Section 2 of the document list along these lines but we can more clarity in future version. Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Me

Re: [Pce] New PCE WG Document: draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document

Hi JP, Loa and WG: We have published https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp/ , accordingly and soliciting WG comments and feedback. @Loa, please correct us... We believe we have addressed your comment via email. No change to document is needed for that. Than

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document

Support! Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" Date: Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:06 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document >Dear WG, > >We had several discussions showing a

Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document

Support! Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" Date: Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:06 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document >Dear WG, > >We had several discussions showing a

Re: [Pce] Working group last call (including final IPR check) for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-09

Hi- I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks Regards ... Zafar From: Jonathan Hardwick mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>> Date: Monday, June 6, 2016 at 10:32 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" mailto:pce@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aw...@ietf.org

[Pce] Status update on

Dear WG and the Chairs, Sorry for the delay in providing this status update. The following is a status update for draft-ietf-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-04.txt. Current Status: • A fresh was done on November 13, 2017 (draft-ietf-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-04.txt). • Draft has been st

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption Call for draft-negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6

Support! This is one of the building blocks for SRv6. Thanks Regards … Zafar From: Pce on behalf of "dhruv.i...@gmail.com" Date: Friday, February 22, 2019 at 1:47 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption Call for draft-negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6 Hi WG, Please read & review draf

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Support! Thanks Regards … Zafar From: Pce on behalf of "julien.meu...@orange.com" Organization: Orange Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 5:13 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06? Hi all, It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidi

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03

Dear chairs and the WG The draft covers the PECP aspects for the ongoing work on P2MP SR policies in Spring, Bess and Pim working groups I support the adoption! Thanks Regards … Zafar From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody Date: Monday, October 18, 2021 at 8:34 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" Cc: "draft

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-16

Dear chairs and the WG, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this draft Thanks Regards … Zafar From: Zhenghaomian Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 9:04 PM To: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "victor.lopezalva...@telefonica.com" , &q

[Pce] Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

, Samuel Sidor (ssidor) , Zafar Ali (zali) , pce@ietf.org , pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor Hi Authors, In preparation for WGLC on this draft, we'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR