Oscar,
On Nov 12, 2012, at 6:56 AM, Oscar González de Dios wrote:
So… one of the main discussions so far has been the
“delegation” function. The name of delegation itself (and the description in
the draft) suggest a control in the PCE, and that it is the PCE the element
that ma
Dear PCErs,
Let's follow Ed suggestion of renaming the thread discussion to
"Control vs Computation", and try to agree in this point (other threads can be
started for other discussions, such as what can be computed or not). I'll try
to summarize my vision of control vs computati
Igor,
On Nov 9, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Igor Bryskin wrote:
> Jan,
>
> You said:
> => draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce does not change the control of the LSPs - it
> still remains with the PCC. A network controller would have to be able to
> dynamically add/delete LSPs in order to fit in the model that
Ed, Jan and all,
CCAMP has developed a mechanism (RFC5493 and RFC 5852), using which a network
controller can obtain the ownership of LSPs created via control plane.
This done, the network controller can use information received from the
companion stateless PCE to optimize their paths and then r
Igor et al
Can we please separate the discussions, as Oscar made multiple unrelated
arguments in the original post? I'm renaming this thread.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Igor Bryskin wrote:
> I completely agree with Oscar.
>
> The statefull PCE as defined in RFC 4655 is clearly different fr
