...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 10 October 2014 10:17
To: Cyril Margaria; Ramana Yarlagadda
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] NULL PCUpdate message
Hi Cyril, Ramana,
I agree with this, during returning delegation –
On the receiving side, we ignore the content.
On the sending side, we put
send an empty ERO object
with no sub-objects in PCUpd message.
What does the WG think about this?
Regards,
Dhruv
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cyril Margaria
Sent: 10 October 2014 00:34
To: Ramana Yarlagadda
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] NULL PCUpdate message
Hi
Hi,
>From the definition, an empty PCUpd must contain an ERO, I think the
question boils down to having an empty ERO or an ERO that mirrors the last
ERO received. This is the only required parameter.
I would propose the following text to clarify:
Section 5.5.3:
Add: Upon reception of a PCUpd wit
Hi All,
I have a questions on sending the PCUpdate message to delegate an LSP from
PCE to PCC. Can somebody please help me here to understand the PCUpdate message
For delegating an LSP back to PCC.
Re-delegation section talks about empty message but the PCUpdate request
message definition
Says t
