Hi Dhruv, Julien,
Thank you for the update on the adoption call.
It is ok. We will post the -00 version next week and then we will work on the
-01 version to address the comments received during the adoption call.
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2022 12:54 PM
T
Hi WG,
The adoption call is concluded and we have a new WG I-D. Thanks to those who
provided feedback and comments.
Authors,
Please post a -00 version with no content change when the submission
reopens at 2022-07-23 23:59 EDT (IETF-meeting local time). Please handle
comments received in -01. Sin
9:52 PM
To: Tianran Zhou
Cc: Giuseppe Fioccola ; wang...@chinatelecom.cn;
Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org;
draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi Tianran,
thank you for your response. Your proposal to remove an MPLS network from the
scope
:* Tuesday, July 5, 2022 3:39 AM
> *To:* Giuseppe Fioccola
> *Cc:* wang...@chinatelecom.cn; Dhruv Dhody ;
> pce@ietf.org; draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
>
>
>
> Hi Giuseppe,
>
> thank you for your expedie
Hi Dhruv and all, I support the adoption of the draft, I think it will be useful to extend PCEP for signaling IFIT capabilities and attributes between PCE and PCC as part of bigger IFIT framework. SR Policy is a just one use case as it was already mentioned in previous emails. SY,Boris 24.06.2022,
Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi,
I read through this draft as part of the adoption poll.
I found it quite hard to work out from the Abstract what the purpose of
the document is. The Introduction is a little more informative, but
Hi WG,
I support the adoption as a coauthor.
Best,
Yali
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 4:59 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll fo
pport
the working group working on this document, and it could be adopted.
Regards,
Adrian
From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 24 June 2022 09:59
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi WG,
This email begin
Hi all.
I support the adoption of the draft.
The possibility to automatically activate on-path telemetry, such as Alternate
Marking (RFC8321 and RFC8889), when the path is instantiated is a really
important feature for network monitoring.
I also think that the approach to define a general PCEP ex
Cc: wang...@chinatelecom.cn; Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org;
draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi Giuseppe,
thank you for your expedient reply. I understand RFC 9197 differently. In my
opinion, it applies to nodes that support it, i.e
that it
> does not understand.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Giuseppe
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Greg Mirsky
> *Sent:* Monday, July 4, 2022 6:40 PM
> *To:* Giuseppe Fioccola
> *Cc:* wang...@chinatelecom.cn; Dhruv Dhody ;
> pce@ietf.org; draft-chen-pce-pcep-i..
it does not understand.
Regards,
Giuseppe
From: Greg Mirsky
Sent: Monday, July 4, 2022 6:40 PM
To: Giuseppe Fioccola
Cc: wang...@chinatelecom.cn; Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org;
draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi Giuseppe,
thank
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 7:37 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody
Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Dear WG
I support adoption by PCE WG and would be willing to work on the draft.
I support IFIT PCE extension to carry the IFIT
urday, July 2, 2022 4:45 AM
> *To:* Giuseppe Fioccola
> *Cc:* wang...@chinatelecom.cn; Dhruv Dhody ;
> pce@ietf.org; draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
>
>
>
> Hi Giuseppe,
>
> I have a question about you
Hi Xuerong,
Thanks for the support and for the comments.
Please see my replies inline tagged as [GF].
Regards,
Giuseppe
From: 王 雪荣
Sent: Monday, July 4, 2022 11:56 AM
To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: 回复: WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
H
IOAM
processing.
Regards,
Giuseppe
From: Greg Mirsky
Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2022 4:45 AM
To: Giuseppe Fioccola
Cc: wang...@chinatelecom.cn; Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org;
draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi Giuseppe,
I have a
Hi WG,
It is necessary to have the control plane support for the covered data plane
technologies and the proposal is reasonable, therefore I support the adoption
of this draft.
Thanks!
Haoyu
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 4:59 AM Dhruv Dhody
mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>> wrote:
Hi WG,
This email begi
Hi Giuseppe,
I have a question about your statement:
But if nodes on the path do not support some capabilities, it is not a big
issue. Indeed, both Alternate Marking and IOAM documents specify that nodes
that do not support a specific functionality will forward the packet
without any changes to th
Hi， all，
I support the adoption of this document. Thanks.
Chongfeng
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 4:59 AM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/
Should this draft be adopted by the
Dear WG
I support adoption by PCE WG and would be willing to work on the draft.
I support IFIT PCE extension to carry the IFIT attributes for in-situ IOAM
on path telemetry. I do agree this would be very useful for operators.
I was looking for a framework draft for IFIT and this is what I found
Hi Aijun,
Thanks for the support.
Regarding your question, I think we can clarify this point in the next version.
If a PCE instantiates a path on the PCC with an IFIT capability enabled, it is
supposed that there are at least two nodes (e.g. starting and ending node)
which support it. But if nod
Hi Chairs,
I support the adoption of this document.
Best regards,
Jie
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 4:59 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi WG
n of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why /
Why not? What needs to be fixed before or a
Hi Everyone,
I support the adoption of this useful document.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 4:58 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce
Hi All,
I support the adoption.
Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com
发件人：Dhruv Dhody
收件人：pce
抄 送：draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit
时 间：2022-06-24 17:00:57
主 题：[Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen
Hi WG,
I support the adoption as a coauthor.
Best,
Tianran
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 4:59 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why
/ Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing
to wor
27 matches
Mail list logo
