Hi WG,
Thanks to all who responded to the adoption poll. We have support to adopt
this as a WG item. Please continue to provide your comments as the document
moves through the WG process.
Authors, please post a -00 version 'draft-ietf-pce-multipath-00' with only
the name/date change, and be sure
Hi WG,
Please be aware that an IPR disclosure has been filled on this I-D:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4833/
The WG adoption poll will now close on Monday, May 3rd.
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:22 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption pol
Hi WG,
I support the WG adoption for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05, which provides
extensions to PCEP for signaling multiple Segment-Lists of an SR Candidate-Path.
Thanks,
Yali
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-
Hi Dhruv, Julien, all
Yes, I support the draft. It provides a good way to represent to multiple paths
.
Thanks
Sergio
From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 4:52 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft
Yes, support, the draft is useful for SR Policy.
Cheng
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Hi WG
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this draft. It's useful for the multipath and to
apply with SR policy.
Regards,
Peng Liu
发件人: Dhruv Dhody
时间: 2021/04/14(星期三)22:52
收件人: pce;
抄送人: draft-koldychev-pce-multipath;
主题: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Hi WG,
Hello all,
I support the adoption of this draft.
Regards
Olivier
Le 14/04/2021 à 16:52, Dhruv Dhody a écrit :
> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
>
> Should this draf
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this draft important for multipath support in PCEP
Warm regards,
Luc-Fabrice
Ndifor
Specialist - IP Access and Data center
luc-fabrice.ndi...@mtn.com
T +237 677 55 02 13
Head Office: 360, Rue Drouot
P.O. Box 15 574 Douala, Cameroon
T +237 679 00 90 90
| mtn.cm
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05"duzongp...@foxmail.com" Sat, 17 April 2021 02:20 UTCShow headerHi all,
I support WG adoption of this draft.
It is a valuable job to support multipath in the PCEP.
Best Regards
Zongpeng Du
raft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Hi WG,
I support WG adoption of this draft since it is an important work that fills in
the gap of multipath support in PCEP.
Thank you for your help on progressing this work!
Best regards,
Shu
Hi WG,
I support WG adoption of this draft since it is an important work that fills in
the gap of multipath support in PCEP.
Thank you for your help on progressing this work!
Best regards,
Shuping
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 PM
To: pce@i
Yes, the draft should be adopted. It addresses a crucial gap in the TE
multipath toolkit.
Regards,
-Pavan (as a co-author)
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:53 AM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for
> draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.
I am interested in working on this draft.
Thanks
Gyan
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:21 PM Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
> I support WG adoption of this important draft for instantiation of ECMP
> multipath by encoding multiple segments lists of an SR candidate path.
>
> Gyan
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at
I support WG adoption of this important draft for instantiation of ECMP
multipath by encoding multiple segments lists of an SR candidate path.
Gyan
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:50 PM Tarek Saad wrote:
> I support adoption of this draft as coauthor. This is important to support
> the signaling of
I support adoption of this draft as coauthor. This is important to support the
signaling of multi path LSP with per path attributes in PCEP.
Regards,
Tarek
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 14, 2021, at 10:53 AM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for dr
Support as a co-author.
Thanks,
Siva
From: Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 12:55 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] RE: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Support as co-author
Tha
Support as co-author
Thanks
Hooman
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Hi WG,
As a co-author, I support the adoption of this draft by PCE WG. The draft
provides a generic way to represent multiple paths that taken together satisfy
the given computation constraints/objectives.
Thanks,
Mike.
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 AM
To: pce@ietf.o
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why
/ Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are y
19 matches
Mail list logo
