Perfect!
Thanks
Gyan
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 8:01 AM Adrian Farrel wrote:
> -22 captures it. Thanks,
>
> Adrian
>
>
>
> *From:* Gyan Mishra
> *Sent:* 27 August 2021 06:52
> *To:* adr...@olddog.co.uk
> *Cc:* Dhruv Dhody ; draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep...@ietf.org;
> pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs
>
-22 captures it. Thanks,
Adrian
From: Gyan Mishra
Sent: 27 August 2021 06:52
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk
Cc: Dhruv Dhody ; draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep...@ietf.org;
pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs
Subject: Re: draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls next steps!
Hi Adrian
Agreed. We will make it more
Hi Adrian
Agreed. We will make it more clear.
Many Thanks!
Gyan
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:30 AM Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Yes, thanks, Gyan.
>
>
>
> I think you have captured it all, although some of the behaviours are
> “hidden” in assumptions in the text.
>
>
>
> That is:
>
>
>
>- A
Yes, thanks, Gyan.
I think you have captured it all, although some of the behaviours are “hidden”
in assumptions in the text.
That is:
* A PCEP speaker that offers this feature to its peer that does not
support or does not wish to support the feature will not receive indication
Hi Adrian
See section 1.1 should have answers to your questions related to the
experimental draft.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-21.html#section-1.1
Kind Regards
Gyan
On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 2:40 PM Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi Gyan,
>
>
>
> I am very much in
Thank you Adrian!!!
Gyan
On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 2:40 PM Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi Gyan,
>
>
>
> I am very much in favour of positioning this work as Experimental.
>
>
>
> It is important (as with all IETF Experiments) to capture:
>
> - What stops this extension “escaping" in the
Hi Gyan,
I am very much in favour of positioning this work as Experimental.
It is important (as with all IETF Experiments) to capture:
- What stops this extension “escaping" in the Internet?
- What stops this experiment clashing with other work or harming
deployed
Hi Siva
Many thanks for your support and responding to WG poll sent for interest in
progressing research and development efforts of this work as as an
experimental draft.
Yes that is one of the main R=0 goals and use cases to be able to reuse the
existing PCECC CCI object SDN (SDN-like) SBI
Hi Gyan,
I support this experimental work. If a router communicates with PCE over
PCEP for path computation purpose, it might as well propagate topology via
PCEP eliminating the need for another protocol for that purpose. The lesser
the number of protocols, the better for simplifying network
Dear PCE WG,
We presented the PCEP-LS [1] I-D [2] in the IETF 110 with a quick recap and
a summary of past discussions. Some new scenarios such as PCECC, H-PCE were
highlighted where the PCEP session could be reused.
This is an experimental I-D with the aim to progress research and
development
10 matches
Mail list logo
