Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

ks! > Dhruv (as a WG participant/still chair hat off) > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:49 AM Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) < > hooman.bidg...@nokia.com> wrote: > >> Hi Aijun >> >> >> >> Thanks you for your comments. >> >> >> >> Inline

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

March 23, 2021 3:01 AM > *To:* 'Dhruv Dhody' ; Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - > CA/Ottawa) > *Cc:* pce@ietf.org > *Subject:* RE: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and > action. > > > > Hi, > > > > My consideration is that if the solution depends

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Aijun Thanks you for your comments. Inline Regards Hooman From: Aijun Wang Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 3:01 AM To: 'Dhruv Dhody' ; Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action. Hi, My consid

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 12:48 PM To: Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action. Hi Hooman, On Thu, Mar 18

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

gment taking existing PCEP extensions/procedures in mind. Hope the discussion was useful, it was for me... Thanks! Dhruv (as a WG member) > Regards > Hooman > > > -Original Message- > From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 8:01 AM >

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy/ Regards Hooman -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 8:01 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action. Hi, Speaking as a WG member... Let&#

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi, Speaking as a WG member... Let's continue the discussion on considering the replication segment as an LSP v/s PCECC operation. I just wanted to quickly recap - - We have stateful operations for RSVP-TE: RFC 8231, RFC 8281 - We then introduced SR with a minimal extension of new PST and a new

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Hooman, To respond to your comment, we usually follow the list below: 1- Gauge interest on the mailing list about an I-D, 2- Gauge interest when the I-D is presented to the WG, 3- If enough of 1 and 2, do a 1st poll in the room during WG meetings, 4- If enough of 3, add the I-D to the adoption

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

dy mailto:dhruv.i...@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 11:08 PM To: Tarek Saad mailto:40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org>> Cc: "pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>" mailto:pce@ietf.org>>, "pce-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org>" mailto:pce-c

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

ody Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 10:09 PM To: "Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" Cc: Tarek Saad , "pce@ietf.org" , "pce-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action. Hi Andrew, Thanks for your email. On Fri, Mar 5

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

o: Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) mailto:hooman.bidg...@nokia.com>> Cc: Dhruv Dhody mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>>; pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>; pce-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

r) > Thanks > > Andrew > > > > *From: *Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody < > dhruv.i...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 11:08 PM > *To: *Tarek Saad > *Cc: *"pce@ietf.org" , "pce-cha...@ietf.org" < > pce-cha...@ietf.o

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

y small part of what PCECC is accomplishing. Thanks Andrew From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody Date: Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 11:08 PM To: Tarek Saad Cc: "pce@ietf.org" , "pce-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action. Hi T

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Tarek, Thanks for your message. As I said to Hooman, the key is for WG to figure out if the act of downloading the replication segment is considered a PCECC operation or a regular stateful operation. Since the replication segment state needs to be programmed on the leaves and the replication

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

> -Original Message----- > From: Dhruv Dhody > Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 4:54 AM > To: Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) > Cc: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action. > > Hi Hooman, >

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Dhuruv/WG, From the RBNFs below (extracted from the bottom of this email), the difference I see between the 2 proposals is that the PCE-CC approach requires a new P2MP CCI object just to carry the resplication-sid (which can already be carried today w/mechanisms in [draft-ietf-pce-binding-l

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

ake other members more vocal? Regards Hooman -Original Message- From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 4:54 AM To: Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) Cc: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and actio

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

> For sure the authors are open for discussion, keeping the facts above in > mind. We are not trying to deviate as mentioned, we just don't see the > replication SID breaking the PCE-CC architecture as it doesn't fit into that > end-to-end architecture. > > Regards >

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

ure as it doesn't fit into that end-to-end architecture. Regards Hooman -Original Message- From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:31 AM To: Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) Cc: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Homman, Thank you for your email and further discussion. Speaking as a WG member On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:54 AM Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) wrote: > > Hi Dhruv > > > > As per draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment, a replication segment allows > a node (henceforth called as Rep

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Dhruv As per draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment, a replication segment allows a node (henceforth called as Replication Node) to replicate packets to a set of other nodes(called Downstream Nodes) or hosts in a Segment Routing Domain. A Replication segment can replicate a packet to direc

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Hooman, On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 5:36 AM Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) < hooman.bidg...@nokia.com> wrote: > [Dhruv]: I feel there is some misunderstanding here. The PCECC extensions > defined a new object called CCI, with different object-types to be defined > for various use-cases. There

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

[Dhruv]: I feel there is some misunderstanding here. The PCECC extensions defined a new object called CCI, with different object-types to be defined for various use-cases. There is common handling for all such instructions and it is defined once and can be reused across multiple use cases. I und

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Hooman, Please keep in mind that adoption isn't a prerequisite to start getting input. You've already started to get some. Technical discussion on the list is part of the normal working process and it helps the chairs to gauge WG consensus. Note the adoption queue on the wiki page. If you want

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Hooman, Please see inline... On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:36 PM Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) wrote: > > Hi Dhruv > > Much appreciate your reply, Inline > > Thanks > Hooman > > > -Original Message- > From: Dhruv Dhody > Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 5:28 AM > To: Bidgoli, Hooman

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Dhruv Much appreciate your reply, Inline Thanks Hooman -Original Message- From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 5:28 AM To: Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action. Hi

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Hooman, Apologies! Missed replying to this email... On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:27 AM Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) wrote: > > Dear Chairs > > > > Looking at the wiki page there was a comment on the sr-p2mp-policy draft. > > > > draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy > > 109; More work is needed -

[Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Dear Chairs Looking at the wiki page there was a comment on the sr-p2mp-policy draft. draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy 109; More work is needed - align to PCECC, text needs to aligned to the PCE WG style The authors took an action to setup a