-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-01-29 22:15, SourceForge.net wrote:
I use Ubuntu 64 bit on a pc with intel i7. Until yesterday Ubuntu 10.10 +
Puredata + Gem worked well.
Today i upgrade Ubuntu to 11.4 and 11.11. When i open Puredata, it say:
Bugs item #3481753, was opened at 2012-01-30 13:00
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=3481753group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
The current pdstring format of lists of bytes seems to be working out pretty
well. I just had a thought, it would be nice to be able to write Unicode text
out as UTF-8 files using [binfile]. I think currently it only accepts byte
values of 0-255. What if it converted values 255 in the
On 2012-01-30 17:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The current pdstring format of lists of bytes seems to be working out pretty well.
I just had a thought, it would be nice to be able to write Unicode text out as
UTF-8 files using [binfile]. I think currently it only accepts byte values of
On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Martin Peach wrote:
On 2012-01-30 17:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The current pdstring format of lists of bytes seems to be working out pretty
well. I just had a thought, it would be nice to be able to write Unicode
text out as UTF-8 files using
I'm really happy to see this conversation.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Charles Henry czhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Peter Brinkmann
peter.brinkm...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't think users have anything to gain from fine-grained control of
threads. That
I see the next important step as making the general cases easier to
handle. A per-thread context such as IOhannes and Peter describe above
seems like the best approach to allowing a program to run multiple
instances of pd in a much more predictable manner, while it still allows
for backwards
