Patches item #3494768, was opened at 2012-02-26 08:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=3494768group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Patches item #3494768, was opened at 2012-02-26 08:10
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by zmoelnig
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=3494768group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Patches item #3494768, was opened at 2012-02-26 08:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by millerpuckette
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=3494768group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Patches item #3494768, was opened at 2012-02-26 08:10
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by millerpuckette
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=3494768group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Yes, I object. Like I said in the bug tracker and this thread, I think
the offset should either remain the same or be the same as the rest.
.hc
On 02/28/2012 04:45 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
trying to take the heat out of this:
my patch suggested to change the loglevel offset from +4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-02-28 16:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Yes, I object. Like I said in the bug tracker and this thread, I think
the offset should either remain the same or be the same as the rest.
may i ask why? what makes 4 better than 3?
fgmasdr
On 02/28/2012 10:06 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2012-02-28 16:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Yes, I object. Like I said in the bug tracker and this thread, I think
the offset should either remain the same or be the same as the rest.
may i ask why? what makes 4 better than 3?
+4
Patches item #3494768, was opened at 2012-02-26 08:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=3494768group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Patches item #3494768, was opened at 2012-02-26 08:10
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by zmoelnig
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=3494768group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Patches item #3494768, was opened at 2012-02-26 08:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=3494768group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i move that to the list, as it makes discussion easier.
On 2012-02-27 15:32, SourceForge.net wrote:
Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
idea to change to loglevel+4 to loglevel+3. Either leave verbose()'s
custom level numbering the
If post(), error(), etc. are your examples, then verbose() should have no level
argument, just the fmt, then it could post at level 4. That makes sense to me.
If verbose() is meant to post messages at varying levels, then it should use
the same numbering scheme as everything else, i.e.
On 02/27/12 19:34, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
If post(), error(), etc. are your examples, then verbose() should have no level
argument, just the fmt, then it could post at level 4. That makes sense to me.
If verbose() is meant to post messages at varying levels, then it should use
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
