Hallo,
Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:57:00 +0900
> PSPunch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry for accidentally sending the previous note to pd-list.
>
> I'd love to hear this stay on list.
I think, David was referring to pd-list vs. pd-dev for this t
Hi, Charles,
I think it is just the matter of WHERE the code goes.
My understanding (as for now) is that the method registered with
gensym("dsp") is called,
>> anytime when either the block size or sample rate changes or when the
>> signal graph is rebuilt.
so that running this check,
> i
There's a rather hard-to-understand description on
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Publications/cmj91-max.ps
cheers
Miller
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 09:57:00AM +0900, PSPunch wrote:
>
> Sorry for accidentally sending the previous note to pd-list.
>
>
> Thomas,
>
>
> >> I hear that malloc is a "rela
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:57:00 +0900
PSPunch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry for accidentally sending the previous note to pd-list.
I'd love to hear this stay on list. David is asking all the
right questions, and the answers (Thomas and Iohannes)
are the kind of thing it takes weeks or months
Sorry for accidentally sending the previous note to pd-list.
Thomas,
>> I hear that malloc is a "relatively" expensive task.
>> Is it bad practice to run this each cycle, or is a kilobyte or two not a
>> bid deal?
> That's definitely bad practice.
> Instead of that you can do the allocation i
