On 04/09/2011 03:48 PM, Patrice Colet wrote:
hello,
- dmotdinaudi...@simplesuperlativ.es a écrit :
and the source of my original problem, milllers pd.dll breaking the
gnu
linker likely will effect building other libs under mingw.
did you try to compile Miller's pd.dll with
On Apr 9, 2011, at 2:27 AM, dmotd wrote:
On 04/09/2011 03:48 PM, Patrice Colet wrote:
hello,
- dmotdinaudi...@simplesuperlativ.es a écrit :
and the source of my original problem, milllers pd.dll breaking the
gnu
linker likely will effect building other libs under mingw.
did you
On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Thomas Grill wrote:
the bottom line, mingw + autotools is some kinda headache! so where
to now?
Hi,
doesn't the pd build system use mingw and autotools?
It must have the same problems, or a solution for it, no?
gr~~~
mingw and autotools seems to work fine for
Hi,
doesn't the pd build system use mingw and autotools?
It must have the same problems, or a solution for it, no?
gr~~~
mingw and autotools seems to work fine for things like zexy, OSCx, etc.
Plus all the of the libs that Pd-extended uses are built on MinGW.
.hc
the original post
hello,
- dmotd inaudi...@simplesuperlativ.es a écrit :
and the source of my original problem, milllers pd.dll breaking the
gnu
linker likely will effect building other libs under mingw.
did you try to compile Miller's pd.dll with makefile.mingw ?
