Hi, Im trying to get msgfile to work on OSX 10.4.8 (G4) using HCS's
PD 0.39.2 extended (test 4). No luck. Wont read, write or anything.
Just printing [done] bang. Is there a known bug/break here? Cant find
anything on the list...
Thanks,
Timon
This is what I've ended up doing too (tabplay~ and tabwrite~ with bangs for
each) - I think maybe the devs will add the voltage control to tabwrite~ in
the distant future. Maybe a tabwrite4~ if possible?
Thanks again for your help.
Kevin
On 12/27/06, Peter Plessas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have some newbie questions here...
why is it that [*] is only for floats, whereas if you want to multiply two
signals one has to use [*~] ?
And then why is it that [*~] can multiply a signal by a float, but [*]
can't do that?
And then why is it that [*~] can't multiply a float by a
Haha at first I didn't see who posted this and thought, 'what a newb...'
Now I'm thinking that some philosophic sparring of Pd fundamentals is about
to begin. I'll make some popcorn and watch this one from the sidelines...
~Kyle
On 12/27/06, Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
some follow-ups:
why is it that [*] is only for floats, whereas if you want to multiply two
signals one has to use [*~] ?
why do patch cords have different width?
And then why is it that [*~] can multiply a signal by a float, but [*]
can't do that?
why can |*~| multiply two signals, but
Hallo!
Has anyone done the job out there ?
Or does anyone have hints how i could manage to do so ?
I think one of the easiest ways is to do it in python with pyext!
LG
Georg
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Hi, I'm bad with like t f f, t b f, t b b, and ftos wondering if anyone could
write comments for the stuff subpatch of this easysampler patch, i think
hardoff attached this somewhere once. The above listed areas are mainly the
ones where comments would help but even clarity on the receive
Hallo!
Hm ... what do you want to say ?
You want polymorphism ?
LG
Georg
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I have some newbie questions here...
why is it that [*] is only for floats, whereas if you want to multiply two
signals one has to use [*~] ?
And then why is it that [*~] can multiply a signal by a float, but [*] can't
do that?
because according to Pd rules its not OK to confuse the user
Hallo,
Mike McGonagle hat gesagt: // Mike McGonagle wrote:
I was wondering if there are any externals that do set operations. I
was reading a paper on Fuzzy Logic (
http://arts.ucsc.edu/EMS/Music/research/FuzzyLogicTutor/FuzzyTut.html
), and the author used Max to do his programming. Is there
What about efficiency? There may be certain advantages to defining
the data types, and constraining _inlets_ and atom types during
editing, rather than at run time. (that's just a guess)
Hm ... what do you want to say ? You want polymorphism ?
I say what I say. I'm asking, would we prefer
alejo d wrote:
hia, some months ago there was a thread about controllin' step motors
from pd to the arduino, it went as it often goes, into a very
technical discussion and at the end im not sure if it is or is not
possible to control this kind of motors via pduino or any other way..
i just
This article is great, thanks for sharing!
~Kyle
On 12/27/06, Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
Mike McGonagle hat gesagt: // Mike McGonagle wrote:
I was wondering if there are any externals that do set operations. I
was reading a paper on Fuzzy Logic (
yoo martin, thanks again, as said in my post, i have the stepper already
under control via a ULN2003A driver and a potentiometer.
im stuck in the pd part, no problems with comport or the serial but with the
pd patch.
On 12/27/06, Martin Peach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With pduino you can
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 13:43 -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Georg Holzmann wrote:
Hm ... what do you want to say ? You want polymorphism ?
I say what I say. I'm asking, would we prefer polymorphism in this
particular circumstance, and why or why not.
(Of course I
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, carmen wrote:
Matju wrote:
why is it that [*] is only for floats, whereas if you want to multiply
two signals one has to use [*~] ? And then why is it that [*~] can
multiply a signal by a float, but [*] can't do that?
because according to Pd rules its not OK to confuse the
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Tim Blechmann wrote:
well, does polymorphism improve the expressive power in terms of
determination between messaging and dsp?
I can't answer because I can't guess what you mean by determination
here.
Do you mean that it would be difficult to figure out what's a DSP
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 15:40 -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Tim Blechmann wrote:
well, does polymorphism improve the expressive power in terms of
determination between messaging and dsp?
I can't answer because I can't guess what you mean by determination
here.
Do
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Tim Blechmann wrote:
Matju wrote:
why is it that [*] is only for floats, whereas if you want to multiply two
signals one has to use [*~] ?
why do patch cords have different width?
Because Miller added that in 0.35 or 0.36 or some other release. But more
deeply: because
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Tim Blechmann wrote:
from the user point of view, i think, it's a good idea, to have a
specific separation between dsp and messaging, because both work with
very different concepts.
But of the difference between dsp and messaging, which ones of the very
differences of
Very interesting.
You can look in the list-abs library. I don't know if there is a
list-roll_left abstraction though.
I was looking in the last few days how fuzzy logic could be
implemented for musical algorithmics... If we need a new external for
this kind of maths, I would be interested in
alejo d wrote:
yoo martin, thanks again, as said in my post, i have the stepper
already under control via a ULN2003A driver and a potentiometer.
im stuck in the pd part, no problems with comport or the serial but
with the pd patch.
I don't have the patch here, it's at work, next week I go
If I type something like this in a messagebox:
list +1 +1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1
then should the +1 be floats or symbols?
(currently, they're symbols)
_ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
|
Dunno which is should be, but the 'c' language doesn't
allow unary '+' in front of numerical literals... so I
followed that lead.
cheers
Miller
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 09:05:09PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
If I type something like this in a messagebox:
list +1 +1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1
A small correction:
apparently device 0 does not work no matter what, but /dev/dv1394/0 works
sometimes but only with black output.
Here's the relevant output from the Pd:
Open example video/00.SimpleVideo.pd
Shell (from which Pd was started): /dev/video0: No such file or directory
(i guess
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Miller Puckette wrote:
Dunno which is should be, but the 'c' language doesn't
allow unary '+' in front of numerical literals... so I
followed that lead.
I don't know which C language you are talking about. Try compiling the
following program with options -ansi
Hi all,
Here I am 6 months later trying to upgrade my laptop and a new issue has
cropped up with my video capture in Gem.
System: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy) i386 using udev
Graphics: ATI 9600 running fglrx
Kernel: 2.6.18-rt7
Video capture: el-cheapo camcorder run through ADVC-100 firewire device
When
Hallo,
Alexandre Quessy hat gesagt: // Alexandre Quessy wrote:
Very interesting.
You can look in the list-abs library. I don't know if there is a
list-roll_left abstraction though.
There is [list-rot], which is similar to [Lror] but rotates the other
direction, so you should use [* -1] to
28 matches
Mail list logo
