[PD] glitchy [tabread] or ..?

i have noticed that [tabread] doesn't work as i expected it just outputs too many zeroes, and only gives values for some of the elements of the array it heppends just even in the helppatch .. it actually gives not a zero only for the EVEN values of index .. . BUT for less then a half of the valu

[PD] iemmatrix for macosx

hi, where can i find iemmatrix compiled for macosx intel? ive tried the one from here: http://www.netpd.org/Iemmatrix but when i load it i got this message /Applications/pd/Pd-0.39.2-extended-test7.app/Contents/Resources/extra/iemmatrix.pd_darwin: dlopen(/Applications/pd/Pd-0.39.2-extended-test7

Re: [PD] mp3live~ connection lost too little input

On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 18:21 +0300, Batuhan Bozkurt wrote: > > What would one need to do to get low latencies(1-2 seconds max) with > audio streaming? (sending control values to identical patches is not an > option for me, I need to stream audio) blame me for this suggestion, but why not using

Re: [PD] Simple PD GUI enhancement - like Max Toolbox

Check the pd-msg docs in CVS or in Pd-extended in Help->Browser- >manuals->pd-msg for info on dynamic patch creation with Pd internal messages. Hmm, I wonder how hard it would be to get info on the objects that are currently selected. Something like object numbers and x,y location. Wit

Re: [PD] Simple PD GUI enhancement - like Max Toolbox

WHAT! I did not know tot could do that! Surprise, surprise! Thanks Patrice. I could build an object toolbar with that! Tom On 9/10/07, Patrice Colet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 9/10/07, Batuhan Bozkurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Is there any facility like this in PD? Not ne

Re: [PD] Simple PD GUI enhancement - like Max Toolbox

Hi, > On 9/10/07, Batuhan Bozkurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is there any facility like this in PD? Not necessarily javascript but > > some sort of "controlling patches structure from another patch" > facility? > > This is possible indeed with the [tot]'s capture option. See

Re: [PD] Simple PD GUI enhancement - like Max Toolbox

Starting from scratch (an empty patch) you can do it with internal messages. But with a currently build patch it is not possible now. Tom On 9/10/07, Kyle Klipowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as I can tell, you can do this with internal messages to Pd. Am > I off base here? > > ~Kyle >

Re: [PD] Simple PD GUI enhancement - like Max Toolbox

As far as I can tell, you can do this with internal messages to Pd. Am I off base here? ~Kyle On 9/10/07, Batuhan Bozkurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > > On Sep 9, 2007, at 10:48 PM, Batuhan Bozkurt wrote: > > > >> pat wrote: > >>> Batuhan Bozkurt a écrit : > >>

Re: [PD] Simple PD GUI enhancement - like Max Toolbox

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Sep 9, 2007, at 10:48 PM, Batuhan Bozkurt wrote: > >> pat wrote: >>> Batuhan Bozkurt a écrit : Hello, I've made the switch from Max/MSP to PD 1-1.5 years ago right before I switched my OS to linux and I'm loving almost every moment of it. >>>

Re: [PD] Simple PD GUI enhancement - like Max Toolbox

I think to implement it we would need new externals to provide better access to the window(patche) contents,names and such... Tom On 9/10/07, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sep 9, 2007, at 10:48 PM, Batuhan Bozkurt wrote: > > > pat wrote: > >> Batuhan Bozkurt a écrit :

Re: [PD] [Pd] Building OSCx on 64-bit Debian

On 9/9/07, Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chuckk Hubbard wrote: > > On 9/8/07, *Ken Restivo* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 06:48:52PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard

Re: [PD] Simple PD GUI enhancement - like Max Toolbox

On Sep 9, 2007, at 10:48 PM, Batuhan Bozkurt wrote: > pat wrote: >> Batuhan Bozkurt a écrit : >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've made the switch from Max/MSP to PD 1-1.5 years ago right before >>> I switched my OS to linux and I'm loving almost every moment of it. >>> But there is only one thing I got used

Re: [PD] puredata for smartphones

If Blackberry has a POSIX C API, then it should be too hard to port Günter's PDa to blackberry. Same goes for Palm, Symbian, Windows Mobile, etc. http://gige.xdv.org/pda/ If the device is running Linux, then it would be even easier. .hc On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:54 AM, dafydd hughes wrote:

Re: [PD] mp3live~ connection lost too little input

My os is windows. i´ve been looking about icecast and understood how it works. im conncetig to an external icecast seerver using oddcast/winamp and it works ok. but have not been able to connect to the icecast server (nor for sending the stream or for listening any stream) using the pd objects. ca

Re: [PD] polyWaveSynth issue

IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : > Patrice Colet wrote: >> Mathieu Bouchard a écrit : >>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, Kyle Klipowicz wrote: >>> Yes, I can understand how that might be frustrating. That's why I really enjoy keeping my personal settings in the .pdrc file on OS X or Linux. With wi

Re: [PD] puredata for smartphones

This might, but it's not out yet... http://www.openmoko.org/ I'm 'a get one as soon as they're avaiable tho. cheers dafydd On 9/10/07, punchik punchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello pd people, i would like to buy a smart phone... > but i want to get one that supports puredata. > > Can i use

[PD] puredata for smartphones

hello pd people, i would like to buy a smart phone... but i want to get one that supports puredata. Can i use puredate from a blackberry 8800? or 8300? if not , which mobil phones does support puredata? many thanks punchikkus __

Re: [PD] Rotary controllers in PD?

Hallo, Ken Restivo hat gesagt: // Ken Restivo wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 12:52:54PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > Hallo, > > Ken Restivo hat gesagt: // Ken Restivo wrote: > > > > > 2's complement from 64/Relative (Binary Offset) > > > 2's Complement from 0 / relative (2's Complement

Re: [PD] my first extension, FINISHED

Hallo, Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:04:43PM +0200, Steffen wrote: > > This relates to your question. There is a tendency in thinking that > > "objects" that can be build by using pure Pd object are better kept > > build in pure Pd objects r

Re: [PD] polyWaveSynth issue

Patrice Colet wrote: > Mathieu Bouchard a écrit : >> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, Kyle Klipowicz wrote: >> >>> Yes, I can understand how that might be frustrating. That's why I >>> really enjoy keeping my personal settings in the .pdrc file on OS X or >>> Linux. With windows, this isn't an option, but a .ba