Re: [PD] Non-Linear Quantization / Bitcrush

2010-11-03 Thread Frank Barknecht
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 06:13:49PM -0400, brandon zeeb wrote: Great! Unfortunately, I'm not entirely sure how to realize this in Pd. Can you help me out with a little example? Like in the attachement maybe. The [pd roundit] doesn't do a floor, but a real rounding. Rounding or flooring is at

[PD] Shifter~ Object for Linux?

2010-11-03 Thread Pierre Massat
Hi all, A few months ago I posted a message about a pitch shifter and someone pointed me to the shifter~ object ported to Pd by Julian Villeguas ( http://julovi.net/j/?page_id=7). Unfortunately the makefile wasn't written for Linux. Is there a way i can compile it to run in Fedora? Thanks!

[PD] drag and drop files in pd ?

2010-11-03 Thread tep
i'm looking for a way to drag and drop files in linux (ubuntu), in order to get the path of the file (in the manner of the [dropfile] object in maxmsp) and possibly the filetype ? -- ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -

[PD] [PD-announce] Listen: High-Spheres, Participatory Soundscape Concert Re-new 2010

2010-11-03 Thread Marco Donnarumma
(sorry for x-posting) Dear all, I just uploaded an excerpt from 6 channels open air participatory soundscape concert High Spheres hosted at Re-new Festival, Copenhagen in May 2010. The concert - performed by the audience and managed by an autonomous responsive system developed in Pd - took place

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] Listen: High-Spheres, Participatory Soundscape Concert Re-new 2010

2010-11-03 Thread Knud Riishøjgård
Hi Marco - I was there :) - it was great fun for the audience, not least for the kids (as we can hear). I wish that more interactive setups would be inspiring for the kids, as yours. Unfortunaltely your recording stop just before I introduce the ringtone from my mobile as input :) best Knud

Re: [PD] manipulation of symbols?

2010-11-03 Thread João Pais
hmm, sprintf is usually for the other way round. you would need scanf... anyhow, [symbol2list -] will split your symbol into 1234, 56, 78_12-23.aaa so it's a bit more comfortable than [splitfilename]. yep, I had forgotten about this object. always handy when it comes to separate a symbol

Re: [PD] Shifter~ Object for Linux?

2010-11-03 Thread Derek Holzer
You could use [plugin~], in which case there is the am_pitchshft in the SWH plugins lib. Worked well for me as a LADSPA plugin in Arodur in the past, haven't tried it with [plugin~] in Pd. D. On 11/3/10 10:22 AM, Pierre Massat wrote: Hi all, A few months ago I posted a message about a pitch

Re: [PD] Shifter~ Object for Linux?

2010-11-03 Thread Pierre Massat
Plugin~ has never worked on my laptop. It crashes Pd. Pierre 2010/11/3 Derek Holzer de...@umatic.nl You could use [plugin~], in which case there is the am_pitchshft in the SWH plugins lib. Worked well for me as a LADSPA plugin in Arodur in the past, haven't tried it with [plugin~] in Pd.

Re: [PD] Shifter~ Object for Linux?

2010-11-03 Thread Derek Holzer
[plugin~] works fine when given the proper creation arguments. That said, the creation arguments in the official help file may not be the correct ones for you! There was a few threads, one in the last year, about getting [plugin~] to work. You might check those. Best! D. On 11/3/10 1:00

Re: [PD] Shifter~ Object for Linux?

2010-11-03 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
Hi Pierre, Pierre Massat wrote: Hi all, A few months ago I posted a message about a pitch shifter and someone pointed me to the shifter~ object ported to Pd by Julian Villeguas (http://julovi.net/j/?page_id=7). Unfortunately the makefile wasn't written for Linux. Is there a way i can

[PD] Purpose of sig~

2010-11-03 Thread Jamie Bullock
Hi all, This is more of philosophical question than anything else. I'm curious to know why [sig~] hasn't been designed out of Pd. Why not have implicit control - signal conversion everywhere it is possible? For example why not allow this? |2( |3( | | [+~ ] Jamie --

Re: [PD] Purpose of sig~

2010-11-03 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Jamie Bullock wrote: This is more of philosophical question than anything else. I think of it as rather pragmatic. What does make a question philosophical according to you ? I'm curious to know why [sig~] hasn't been designed out of Pd. But it *has* been designed

Re: [PD] Purpose of sig~

2010-11-03 Thread Jack
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 14:46 +, Jamie Bullock a écrit : Hi all, This is more of philosophical question than anything else. I'm curious to know why [sig~] hasn't been designed out of Pd. Why not have implicit control - signal conversion everywhere it is possible? For example

Re: [PD] Purpose of sig~

2010-11-03 Thread brandon zeeb
In response to your example below, the result of the addition will be 5~ given that messages [2( and [3( were sent while DSP was off. This is a surprise to me! [sig~] can be helpful when you require a constant value at audio-rate, any example I can conjure seems contrived (as in writing a

[PD] [PD-announce] NYC Patching Circle got an Eyebeam residency

2010-11-03 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
As part of Eyebeam's X-Lab, the NYC Patching Circle has got a residency at Eyebeam. So the next three NYC Patching Circles will be at Eyebeam on the third Thursday of November, December, and January. So that's the evening of November 18th, December 16th, and January 21st, from 6-10pm.

Re: [PD] Purpose of sig~

2010-11-03 Thread Andy Farnell
There are some uses of [sig~] which are not immediately obvious but turn out to be desirable. By definition it is useful any place you want a message domain value converted to a signal, without any further ado. Without it, relying only on implicit conversion you might never have access to a signal

Re: [PD] Purpose of sig~

2010-11-03 Thread Jamie Bullock
On 3 Nov 2010, at 16:14, Andy Farnell wrote: There are some uses of [sig~] which are not immediately obvious but turn out to be desirable. By definition it is useful any place you want a message domain value converted to a signal, without any further ado. Without it, relying only on

Re: [PD] Purpose of sig~

2010-11-03 Thread Jamie Bullock
On 3 Nov 2010, at 15:21, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Jamie Bullock wrote: This is more of philosophical question than anything else. I think of it as rather pragmatic. What does make a question philosophical according to you ? I mean that I'm interested in the reasoning

Re: [PD] Purpose of sig~

2010-11-03 Thread Andy Farnell
Though on the downside... a [sig~] is more expensive. The good part about implicit conversion is you have to do it once and the object can retain that state. cheers a. On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:20:57 + Jamie Bullock ja...@postlude.co.uk wrote: On 3 Nov 2010, at 16:14, Andy Farnell

Re: [PD] Listen: High-Spheres, Participatory Soundscape Concert Re-new 2010

2010-11-03 Thread Marco Donnarumma
Hi Knud! thanks for your feedback, that concert has been an inspiring experience indeed. Personally speaking, it was very interesting to see how participants related to each other's sounds. There was who wanted to be the loudest, who kept following the orchestra, but almost everyone after a while

Re: [PD] Purpose of sig~

2010-11-03 Thread Andy Farnell
Ah yes! A joy us vanilla freaks have yet to fully cherish. :) a. On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote: They are already explicit-- at least in pd-extended, where the signal inlets are visually distinct from the control inlets. -- Andy Farnell

Re: [PD] Purpose of sig~

2010-11-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Wed, 11/3/10, Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk wrote: From: Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk Subject: Re: [PD] Purpose of sig~ To: pd-list@iem.at Date: Wednesday, November 3, 2010, 5:14 PM There are some uses of [sig~] which are not immediately obvious but turn out