Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

Please pardon my ignorance, but would it be possible to publish an app through XYZ store and in case XYZ store does not have ability to also include source that the project author host such source on its own page and have the link to it embedded inside the app? On Oct 6, 2013 12:09 AM, "Rich E" wr

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

AFAIK, [expr]/[expr~] are not built into any libpd produced binaries, nor any other GPL/LGPL components. The user has to opt into those by adding them to their project. So you should be good. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Dan Wilcox wrote: > If your using libpd, you can simple remove the

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

Awesome, thank you. I'm glad we could figure it out. I remember checking a few times and we discussed this in libpd. I kept getting confused by the different licenses. On Oct 6, 2013, at 3:55 AM, Miller Puckette wrote: > OK... done and pushed to git repo. > > cheers > M > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2

[PD] Sound on sound delay

Does anyone have an example if an eno-esque sound on sound delay system I can gander at and tweak? Patrick Pagano B.S,M.F.A Asst. in Digital Art and Science Digital Worlds Institute University of Florida (352) 294-2020 On Oct 5, 2013, at 3:19 PM, "Miller Puckette" wrote: > Hmm... Looking bac

Re: [PD] [biquad~] as max's phaseshift? (was [biquad~] as cyclone's [allpass~]?)

hi mmb, thanks for showing up :) h, my problem was that the phase response graph generated from your Pd patch based on RBJ looks different than the one from max's phaseshift. But it just occurred to me that one thing about it might only be a matter of normalizing it and displaying in the same

Re: [PD] [biquad~] as max's phaseshift? (was [biquad~] as cyclone's [allpass~]?)

>From looking at the helpfile for [phaseshift~], this sounds very much like the all-pass filter from Robert Bristow-Johnson's EQ Cookbook. You can calculate the biquad coefficients for it like this: w0 = 2*pi*frequency_in_Hz / sample_rate alpha = sin(w0)*sinh(ln(2)/2*Q*w0/sin(w0)) fb1 = 2*cos(w0)

Re: [PD] [biquad~] as cyclone's [allpass~]?

on curtis roads' computer music tutorial, page 418, it shows the same formula, but the figure of the design seems to contradict it. I'm confused. I don't seem to get the same result with one delay line. maybe if you send me a patch that sounds the same as cyclone's allpass I can check it. cheers

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

OK... done and pushed to git repo. cheers M On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 12:18:23PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: > Hmm... Looking back in the git repo i saw: > > commit 42f3e5f8dbc60ad644e9f8a1c5b61d1847e19470 > Author: Miller Puckette > Date: Thu Nov 3 11:40:35 2011 -0700 > > change expr~ s

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

typo I want Pure Data Supercollider and csound to work on my IOS devices not to "make a million dollars in the app store" but to make art pp From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [pd-list-boun...@iem.at] on behalf of Dan Wilcox [danomat...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, O

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

Hmm... Looking back in the git repo i saw: commit 42f3e5f8dbc60ad644e9f8a1c5b61d1847e19470 Author: Miller Puckette Date: Thu Nov 3 11:40:35 2011 -0700 change expr~ source to LGPL license (with IRCAM"s permission :) I had quite forgotten about this (and still can't remember this ever havin

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

please do! I would gladly test it out with some of my apps It would remove a bunch of this While we are on the subject does anyone on here have Supercollider working on IOS? I have a version working but the whole fear of selling it issue unfortunately for me has IMHO limited that lists willingnes

Re: [PD] [biquad~] as max's phaseshift? (was [biquad~] as cyclone's [allpass~]?)

> the phase response given in phaseshift's help file suggest otherwise. it's more like the response from miller's H14 example... So I guess you can have a 2nd order one (lie phaseshift) by putting two of these together, right? And I suspect it doesn't really need to have anything to do biquad jus

Re: [PD] [biquad~] as cyclone's [allpass~]?

i dont think there is one way or proper way of doing this, and it is a general form, from an equation you can find in other references. So, I don't know why, but Max/Cyclone's allpass use this one: y(n) = -g x(n) + x(n)-(DR/1000) + g y(n)-(DR/1000) 2013/10/5 Chris Clepper > That means cyclone's

Re: [PD] [biquad~] as cyclone's [allpass~]?

That means cyclone's allpass~ is not done properly. Why not do it the standard and more efficient way? When it comes time to do dozens of allpasses it will make a difference. On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > but this way it won't be the same as cyclone's [allp

[PD] [biquad~] as max's phaseshift? (was [biquad~] as cyclone's [allpass~]?)

Anyway, next on my list is finding out how to implement max's [phaseshift~], which is also an allpass filter. There's no Pd clone for it so it seems, right? Well, it doesn't really what it is other than a 2nd order filter. From that I could think you can generate it with [biquad~], but the phase r

Re: [PD] [biquad~] as cyclone's [allpass~]?

but this way it won't be the same as cyclone's [allpass~], the way I did it is equivalent to it (and max's). cheers 2013/10/3 Chris Clepper > You only need one delay line for the allpass. > > feedforward = input * -gain > feedback = delayout * gain > delayin = input + feedback > output = delay

Re: [PD] reading tables indices with liner interpoation

I want the patch to have a minimum requirement for installing complex libraries of objects. But if it comes to it I'll use it for sure. Thanks Peiman *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS Feed || Concert News * On 5 O

Re: [PD] reading tables indices with liner interpoation

That's really nice. Thanks very much indeed. Best, Peiman *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS Feed || Concert News * On 5 October 2013 11:44, Frank Barknecht wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 12:23:00AM +0100, peim

[PD] [PD-announce] Radium 1.9.31 released for Linux

Radium 1.9.31 is a big release with many new features and bug fixes. 1.9.31 is the first release with Pd embedded. Pd embedded in Radium has got approximately the same features as Max for Ableton Live. (https://www.ableton.com/en/live/max-for-live/) Screenshot: http://folk.uio.no/ksvalast/radium

Re: [PD] reading tables indices with liner interpoation

On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 12:23:00AM +0100, peiman khosravi wrote: > I'm trying to figure out if there is an object to read table indices with > linear interpolation? Other than linear_path (Gem). > > Or perhaps there is a simpler way of doing it? I made one as an abstraction some time ago, it's at

Re: [PD] reading tables indices with liner interpoation

On 05/10/13 15:52, peiman khosravi wrote: Hello, Thanks for the reply. The thing is that I need to get discrete values to write to another table. So if I input 0.5 I want to get the exact mean of the first and second array elements. I guess it could be done manually in an abstract, but it'd prob

Re: [PD] reading tables indices with liner interpoation

Hello, Thanks for the reply. The thing is that I need to get discrete values to write to another table. So if I input 0.5 I want to get the exact mean of the first and second array elements. I guess it could be done manually in an abstract, but it'd probably be much slower. Thanks Peiman *www

Re: [PD] reading tables indices with liner interpoation

[line ] with arguments to make it smoother 1 initial value 2 time grain in milliseconds check line help is that what you are looking for ? 2013/10/5 peiman khosravi : > I'm trying to figure out if there is an object to read table indices with > linear interpolation? Other than linear_path (Gem).