wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, brandon zeeb wrote:
>
> I'm on 0.43-0 vanilla and just noticed that [loadbang] bangs are not being
>> fired within abstractions which are created dynamically. Am I missing
>> something, or did I just stumble upon a bug?
>>
>
>
Hey dudes,
I'm on 0.43-0 vanilla and just noticed that [loadbang] bangs are not being
fired within abstractions which are created dynamically. Am I missing
something, or did I just stumble upon a bug?
Cheers,
--
Brandon Zeeb
___
Pd-list@i
My fault, you're right. I'm happily wrong about this one.
Cheers,
Brandon
On Dec 22, 2010 9:52 AM, "Roman Haefeli" wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 09:01 -0500, brandon zeeb wrote:
> If Pd's default block size is 64 samples, a...
Not true. Events a.k.a messages are
If Pd's default block size is 64 samples, and "events" are only processed at
the beginning of a block cycle.
Therefore, if you're running at 48,000hz sample rate, then your "Event Rate"
is 750hz.
Likewise a 96,000hz sample rate will give you a 1500hz "Event Rate".
As Mathieu mentioned, if you nee
ang and closebang
> * a way to read a text file that's guaranteed to not generate a bad
> argument
> error
>
> -Jonathan
>
>
>
> --- On *Thu, 12/16/10, brandon zeeb * wrote:
>
>
> From: brandon zeeb
> Subject: Re: [PD] PD OOP?
> To: "Mathieu Bou
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, brandon zeeb wrote:
>
> do you, really ?
>>>
>>
>> Why are people getting offended here?
>>
>
> Am I getting offended ? How would you know, anyway ?
>
>
Well, you'
Sorry, gmail is hacking up the comment log. Comments are inline.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, brandon zeeb wrote:
>
> Say you compute a raised cosine window and store it in a table, this
>> table is used within one instanc
n Wed, 15 Dec 2010, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> On 2010-12-15 13:51, brandon zeeb wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Everything is global
>>>
>> hmm, i'd say the content of a message is as local as can be.
>>
>
> A patchcord by itself is also pretty local
list to an abstraction's inlet. Max's [poly] and
RjDj's u_makepoly~ objects are a very simple example of this.
If you look at the structure of any given synthesizer voice in Pd, I'm sure
you can think of other useful examples of this.
Cheers,
~Brandon
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1
ent ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
--
Brandon Zeeb
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
gt; --- On *Wed, 12/15/10, brandon zeeb * wrote:
>
>
> From: brandon zeeb
>
> Subject: Re: [PD] PD OOP?
> To: "PD List"
> Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 1:51 PM
>
>
> In my experience with emulating OOP in Pd I've had moderate success. As a
In my experience with emulating OOP in Pd I've had moderate success. As a
Java developer by day, I find myself attempting to recreate familiar
patterns within Pd (ie: usually IoC and Flyweight in Pd). Main problems
with recreating OOP in Pd are the following:
1. Everything is global
2. No
would be easier to come up with a solution than it has been
>
>
>
> thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> benfcarney
> www.benfcarney.com
> Chicago, IL
>
>
>
> _______
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE
_
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
--
Brandon Zeeb
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
t at least.
> >>
> >> Do you see what I mean now? See how the amount of quantization changes
> with
> >> Y and a minimum quantization value?
> >>
> >> I think I'm getting towards the answer now...
> >>
> >> --
> >> Brandon Zeeb
&
the answer now...
--
Brandon Zeeb
Columbus, Ohio
<>
my-crush2.pd
Description: Binary data
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
eetings!
> Ludwig
>
> On 1 November 2010 13:09, brandon zeeb wrote:
> > Hey All,
> >
> > I've been burning my brain over this issue lately and I can't seem to
> come
> > up with an elegant solution, and stay with me here as I attempt to
> explain
Hey All,
I've been burning my brain over this issue lately and I can't seem to come
up with an elegant solution, and stay with me here as I attempt to explain
it best I can. For me and my needs, being able to quantize an arbitrary
signal to any arbitrary series is the Holy Grail (and I'm not talk
Bouchard wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, brandon zeeb wrote:
> >
> >> This thread comes up every year or two,
> >
> > I'd say at least twice a year... I think I already wrote about it on
> pd-list this autumn, no...? But it's hard to search the archives abo
To Roman's suggestion, this works well. For the sake of your speakers and
DSP chain, I'd add a [clip~ -1 1] to the end of that to be safe, and place
that combo both right before the [delwrite~ dub] and on the output stream.
For the sake of maximum dub, use a [vd~] instead of a [delread~] and slow
Seriously, use Jack, and watch the CPU usage drop significantly.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Bernardo Barros
wrote:
> sorry for the speculation. I really did not go deeper into this, I
> just used linux and less pd.
> but 20%cpu is a serious bu anyway.
>
> 2010/10/28 Mathieu Bouchard :
> > O
This thread comes up every year or two, try running Pd with JackOSX instead
of having Pd communicate directly with OS X. You should see the Pd process
decrease it's CPU usage significantly.
My guess is it's a Pd-> PortAudio -> OS X thing.
Cheers,
~Brandon
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Berna
ng/03-rhythm-sound-mango-drive
>
> well, the whole tune, specially at 3' 05"
> so those are the dub chords I'm talking about :P
> Sorry for not specifying before,
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Marco
>
>
> From: brandon zeeb
>> Subject: Re: [PD] dub chords
There are many ways to peel that apple, can you post an example of something
similar to what you're aiming for?
Cheers,
~Brandon
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
> Thanks Andy,
> the delay is quite clear now, and what about the source?
>
> Do you think phasors chords coul
Hey all,
Any PD users out there from Columbus, Ohio? If so, we should get a group
together.
Let me know!
~Brandon
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
namecanvas], so it's type would be that of
the canvas, an object type.
Therefore, if you attempted the following, no error should occur (again, in
my happy world)
[clear(
|
|
[s $1]
Miller?
Cheers,
~Brandon
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010,
Sorry, that last example should read:
[clear(
|
|
[s $!]
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:42 PM, brandon zeeb wrote:
> In my happy world, one could perform the following:
>
> [coords 0 -1 1 1 80 90 1 100 100;(
> |
> |
> [s $!]
>
> With the example above, one could perform
You might also find this file helpful, a kind of filter bible:
http://www.musicdsp.org/files/Audio-EQ-Cookbook.txt
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:29 AM, cyrille henry wrote:
> hello,
> you have some exter to compute biquad~ coef in ggee/filter repertory.
>
> i also made some abstraction to compute bq
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2004-12/003428.html
Essentially, being able to send a message to the current canvas in
vanilla-pd without naming it, "this" in the current context is similar to
the Java concept of "this".
If Miller wants to remove [namecanvas], just give us a "this" ex
Dynamic patching is one of the best thing PD has going for it. Without the
ability to dynamically construct abstraction content, PD is an effort in
extreme manual labor, and as a software developer, I disagree with the
concept of manual labor.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wro
What I'm seeing here is basically there is no currently supported way in
vanilla pd to adjust GOP properties for a particular abstraction (not
globally)? If so, this is rather upsetting :(
~Brandon
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:11 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-09-30 09:02, bran
st require:
[message(
|
[s pd-patchname.pd]
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:30 PM, brandon zeeb wrote:
> Oh, that is awesome! Thanks a bunch for compiling these for me.
>
> Going to have some fun tonight...
>
> ~B
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
gt; I'm not sure if the "pd-" prefix is explicitly documented anywhere--
> I only remember seeing it in passing with reference to traversing
> scalars. Maybe it could be added to doc/manuals/pd-msg, then
> have a link to that from canvas-help.pd.
>
> -Jonathan
>
>
s also the "coords" message, which takes its arguments in a
> different order than "donecanvasdialog" and doesn't set the dirty
> flag for Pd < 0.43. Other than that I'm not sure what the
> differences are between the two messages.
>
> -Jonathan
>
>
Hey all,
A few of the tutorials on http://puredata.info/docs/tutorials reference dead
links. If you own these tuts, may I ask that you update them? Pretty
please? :)
Cheers,
~Brandon
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Is there a way to dynamically adjust and enabled graph on parent (GOP)? I'm
building some UI sequencer widgets and it would be preferable to dynamically
adjust the GOP size given user input, say number of steps in a step
sequencer (ie: an 8x8 vs a 16x16 step sequencer using the same abstraction).
I don't really understand this ASCII art. If you don't mind, could you pass
a patch along?
Cheers,
~Brandon
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, brandon zeeb wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a set of tutorials, abstractions, or are the
Greetings,
So I'm reading Miller's book hoping for a real world explanation of the
elementary filter objects in Pd (z~, rpole~, czero~, etc). Unfortunately,
this only occupies 3-4 pages.
Does anyone have a set of tutorials, abstractions, or are their any
documents available which go into further
Hello,
With regards to the block limit thread and the following previous discussion
[1], I have a question regarding event timing resolution in Puredata.
In the previous email thread, it was noted:
> What is also interesting, is that i get the double value of 2.9 msec for
> blocksizes above 64,
I'd like to update biquad coefficients at the block~ size as well, to obtain
smoother transitions.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:01 AM, hard off wrote:
> i wanted to send a bang on a zero-crossing
>
>
>
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and acco
Any chance of having the ability to change that globally if need be?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Martin Schied wrote:
> hi!
>
>
> hard off wrote:
>
>> I made a patch which times the duration between two bangs sent by [bang~].
>> If i set the blocksize to the default of 64, then each bang
0 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On May 18, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
>
> brandon zeeb wrote:
>>
>>> GGEE's [lowpass] seems to be sharp by a semitone or so
>>>
>>
>> [1] line 68: x->x_rate = 44100.0;
>>
&
Indeed, great catch. I hadn't noticed that line!
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On May 18, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
>
> brandon zeeb wrote:
>>
>>> GGEE's [lowpass] seems to be sharp by a semito
09 at 9:45 PM, brandon zeeb wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've implemented the same coefficients as the ggee [lowpass] external in
> Pd, and can't seem to figure out where my calculations are off. The
> calculations are in the [pd lowpass] sub patch.
>
> Any ideas?
> ~Brandon
lo,
> brandon zeeb hat gesagt: // brandon zeeb wrote:
>
> > Good call! I explored the GGEE objects in Pd-extended, which led me to
> > their source code (A+ for readability), which led me to this:
> > http://www.musicdsp.org/files/Audio-EQ-Cookbook.txt
>
> The f
and then build your vanilla
> filters based on those coefficients, the filters themselves are technically
> vanilla as well.
>
> best!
> D.
>
> brandon zeeb wrote:
>
>> Derek,
>>
>> Thanks for the complete list! This is very helpful.
>>
>> I was
m 2-10 order)
> hp2_cheb~ (can go from 2-10 order)
> hp2_crit~ (can go from 2-10 order)
>
> lp1~
> lp2~
> lp2_bess~ (can go from 2-10 order)
> lp2_butt~ (can go from 2-10 order)
> lp2_cheb~ (can go from 2-10 order)
> lp2_crit~ (can go from 2-10 order)
>
> ---GGEE---
>
Hallo,
How does everyone implement basic resonant filters, ie: LPF, HPF, BPF, in
Puredata? [lop~], [hip~], and [bp~] are nice, and can easily be strung
serially to create 2nd, 3rd, and 4th order filters, but lack q.
[biquad~] seems up to the task, but I'm unable to find any information in
the he
f you want, post a bug
> report to the tracker. Please include as much detail as possible.
>
> .hc
>
> On May 14, 2009, at 11:48 AM, brandon zeeb wrote:
>
> In fact, both Shift-Cmd-T and Shift-Cmd-C create a canvas. I re-cleared my
> preferences directory and trie
In fact, both Shift-Cmd-T and Shift-Cmd-C create a canvas. I re-cleared my
preferences directory and tried again, I can reproduce this every time.
~brandon
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:44 AM, brandon zeeb wrote:
> Ok. Well, are the shortcut keys stored in a preference file? Could a
> pr
ve never
>
> .hc
>
> On May 14, 2009, at 10:56 AM, brandon zeeb wrote:
>
> Mac OS X 10.5 i386. Has anyone else been seeing this?
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Let's keep these on
gt; .hc
>
> On May 14, 2009, at 10:38 AM, brandon zeeb wrote:
>
> The toggle shortcut key is still broken, on my machine, it will put a
> canvas on the page instead of a toggle.
>
> ~Brandon
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>>
y [throw~].
>
> A solution where you have a seemingly untracable offset that
> messes all your [throw~][catch~] system, is to use a [delwrite~ a 1]
> and several [delread~ a 1] objects in place of [throw~] and [catch~]
>
>
> On Sat, 02 May 2009 23:49:35 -0400
>
Hey PD-List,
Has the throw~/catch~ system been designed to have a different available
headroom than standard [+~] and [*~] objects?
I've been designing a few polyphonic patches and have decided to use
throw~/catch~ instead of hard-wiring the summing bus. I've found that when
the signal approache
Chris,
I think I might have something here you can spring-board from. I'll
pass it to the list later today, after I clean up some things.
~Brandon
On Nov 17, 2008, at 5:28 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 02:26:46PM -0500, bsoisoi wrote:
>> Why isn't tabwrite~ able to ac
Excellent point, don't listen to me! :)
From your example, I'm assuming you're hinting at including the
ability in this abstraction to switch interpolation schemes by
enabling/disabling sub-patched tabread~, tabread4~, and tabread4c~
objects via inlet messages or creation arguments.
In t
Did you have any issue building this external on 10.4?
Philip and Steffen, are you guys on 10.5?
~Brandon
On Mar 31, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> I added these to SVN already, if someone adds them to externals/
> Makefile, then they can included in the Pd-extended bui
No problem :)
On Mar 21, 2008, at 11:21 AM, pzuspann wrote:
> That worked...thanks, Brandon...really appreciate it...
>
> Peter
>
> - Original Message
> From: bsoisoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: pzuspann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: PD-list@iem.at
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 7:30:06 PM
>
Why can't we simply have the option to turn up (or turn down!) the
resolution of the objects we already have? This is considerably less
complex.
~Brandon
On Mar 9, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> It could be, it's just a matter of someone writing the code :)
> That's
, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> Brandon Zeeb wrote:
>> More specifically, my question is:
>> How does PD's performance scale when the number of available
>> processing units increases from 2 to 4 and to 8 cores? Is the
>> main engine written in such a way as to ta
More specifically, my question is:
How does PD's performance scale when the number of available
processing units increases from 2 to 4 and to 8 cores? Is the main
engine written in such a way as to take advantage of this, or is it
primarily a single-threaded?
Possible scenarios could be:
1
that on my laptop, which is running 10.4.11.
.hc
On Feb 23, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Brandon Zeeb wrote:
Excellent.
However, I can't get passed the last few "unstable" dependencies, I
ALWAYS get this error:
Failed: Internal error: node for ptex-nox-base already exists
This must be a F
I'm using that, actually, and flac from darwinports. At this point,
the builds fail at g_canvas.c... I can't even get Millers Pd to build
yet.
By the way, how does one get Miller's Pd packaged into a application
bundle?
~Brandon
On Feb 15, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
About the iTunes EQ, that is really funny. I just profiled PD while
running the example patch, and you're right (see example 1 below).
Using "Instruments" showed similar results, + a _lot_ of time spent
microsleeping.
Do you find that the CPU load scales well in large patches,
disregard
Ahh, okay. RIght, but if you scheduled that last message at 1800
instead of 59000 it would interrupt the full motion of the previous
item. I was looking at these messages from the perspective of classic
envelope generators (for example, the 'time varying' envelopes on the
Roland XP-50/60/
Awesome, thanks for the info. I'll take a look at it this weekend.
Should I forward any subsequent issues on this topic (ie: Pd on 10.5
and universal binaries) to the pd-dev list, or this one?
I'll let you all know when I have the builds going.
Cheers,
~Brandon
On Jan 25, 2008, at 5:05 PM
I second that. It runs fine on OS X 10.5.1. Good work, Hans. Thanks
for the quick response.
btw, to all Pd devs, you all are doing a great job.
~Brandon
On Nov 17, 2007, at 12:26 PM, marius schebella wrote:
> good job!
> first of all: no crash with the help menu and no crash on saving...
>
67 matches
Mail list logo
