Re: [PD] msgfile and commas

2013-07-31 Thread Max
beautiful! thanks jack. Am 31.07.2013 um 18:56 schrieb Jack : > Le 31/07/2013 11:11, James Dunn a écrit : >> What about something like this? >> >> Quoth Max, on 30/07/2013 23:57: >>> another escaping problem: >>> any idea how the comma could be displayed correctly? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> __

Re: [PD] msgfile and commas

2013-07-31 Thread Jack
Le 31/07/2013 11:11, James Dunn a écrit : > What about something like this? > > Quoth Max, on 30/07/2013 23:57: >> another escaping problem: >> any idea how the comma could be displayed correctly? >> >> >> >> ___ >> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCR

Re: [PD] msgfile and commas

2013-07-31 Thread Max
oh yes! [any2bytes] to my rescue. thanks! the only thing more elegant would be a proper escaping mechanism in Pd. ;) Am 31.07.2013 um 11:11 schrieb James Dunn : > What about something like this? > > Quoth Max, on 30/07/2013 23:57: >> another escaping problem: >> any idea how the comma could be d

Re: [PD] msgfile and commas

2013-07-31 Thread James Dunn
What about something like this? Quoth Max, on 30/07/2013 23:57: another escaping problem: any idea how the comma could be displayed correctly? ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo

[PD] msgfile and commas

2013-07-30 Thread Max
another escaping problem: any idea how the comma could be displayed correctly? comma-msgfile-test.pd Description: Binary data hello, world___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] msgfile: number of lines ?

2010-10-14 Thread tim vets
ok, so I ended up with: [clear, read myfile.txt, end, skip -1, where, rewind( works :) thanks, Tim 2010/10/14 IOhannes m zmoelnig > On 2010-10-14 15:43, tim vets wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is there a way to get msgfile to report the number of lines the loaded > file > > contains (without using 'flus

Re: [PD] msgfile: number of lines ?

2010-10-14 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-10-14 15:43, tim vets wrote: > Hi all, > Is there a way to get msgfile to report the number of lines the loaded file > contains (without using 'flush' and a counter) ? you can get the current position with [where( (after loading you will be at the beyond the last position, so you get a ban

[PD] msgfile: number of lines ?

2010-10-14 Thread tim vets
Hi all, Is there a way to get msgfile to report the number of lines the loaded file contains (without using 'flush' and a counter) ? thank you, Tim ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/

Re: [PD] msgfile doesn't print a full stop after a number..?

2010-01-02 Thread James Dunn
Quoth IOhannes m zmölnig, on 01/01/10 19:25: James Dunn wrote: Hi, I've noticed that that msgfile doesn't seem to print a full stop (period) after a number. I'm using Pd version 0.42.5-extended-20091228 on Ubuntu 9.10 and am sending the message [read filename.txt cr (. The console reports ms

Re: [PD] msgfile doesn't print a full stop after a number..?

2010-01-01 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Dunn wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that that msgfile doesn't seem to print a full stop (period) > after a number. I'm using Pd version 0.42.5-extended-20091228 on Ubuntu 9.10 > and am sending the message [read filename.txt cr (. The console repo

[PD] msgfile doesn't print a full stop after a number..?

2009-12-30 Thread James Dunn
Hi, I've noticed that that msgfile doesn't seem to print a full stop (period) after a number. I'm using Pd version 0.42.5-extended-20091228 on Ubuntu 9.10 and am sending the message [read filename.txt cr (. The console reports msgfile as "[msgfile] part of zexy-2.2.3 (compiled: Dec 28 2009)" Is t

Re: [PD] [msgfile]

2007-12-04 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 09:26 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > marius schebella wrote: > > I am getting similar problems like andy, and it looks like a bug. > > right. > someone please file a bug-report at sourceforge and attach a > bug-triggering patch. did it. btw: how can i assign the bug

Re: [PD] [msgfile]

2007-12-04 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote: > I am getting similar problems like andy, and it looks like a bug. > try the following: if you are at the end of the file and hit bang, then > you lose all data of msgfile. I'm using an older version of zexy (too lazy to upgrade...)

Re: [PD] [msgfile]

2007-12-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
marius schebella wrote: > I am getting similar problems like andy, and it looks like a bug. right. someone please file a bug-report at sourceforge and attach a bug-triggering patch. while the patch posted by andy seems to positively trigger the bug, you have to know exactly what you are doing in

Re: [PD] [msgfile]

2007-12-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 12:12 -0500, marius schebella wrote: > I am getting similar problems like andy, and it looks like a bug. > try the following: if you are at the end of the file and hit bang, then > you lose all data of msgfile. > marius. this description of [msgfile]'s behaviour would fit as

Re: [PD] [msgfile]

2007-12-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:16 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Andy Graybeal hat gesagt: // Andy Graybeal wrote: > > > Thanks for responding. > > > > Here's a very simple patch I made to share this problem... and in making > > this patch, I'm finding that once I play to the end of a sequenc

Re: [PD] [msgfile]

2007-12-03 Thread marius schebella
I am getting similar problems like andy, and it looks like a bug. try the following: if you are at the end of the file and hit bang, then you lose all data of msgfile. marius. Frank Barknecht wrote: Hallo, Andy Graybeal hat gesagt: // Andy Graybeal wrote: Thanks for responding. Here's a ve

Re: [PD] [msgfile]

2007-12-03 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Andy Graybeal hat gesagt: // Andy Graybeal wrote: > Thanks for responding. > > Here's a very simple patch I made to share this problem... and in making > this patch, I'm finding that once I play to the end of a sequence in > [msgfile] that it won't rewind to the beginning.. no matter how m

Re: [PD] [msgfile]

2007-12-02 Thread Andy Graybeal
Frank, Thanks for responding. Here's a very simple patch I made to share this problem... and in making this patch, I'm finding that once I play to the end of a sequence in [msgfile] that it won't rewind to the beginning.. no matter how many times i tell it to "rewind" -Andy > Hallo, > Andy Gray

Re: [PD] [msgfile]

2007-12-02 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Andy Graybeal hat gesagt: // Andy Graybeal wrote: > i'm having some problems with [msgfile].. this is the version i have: > > [msgfile] part of zexy-2.2.0 (compiled: Nov 19 2007) > Copyright (l) 1999-2007 IOhannes m zm��lnig, > forum::f��r::uml��ute & IEM > > i got it out of _hc's pd-

[PD] [msgfile]

2007-12-02 Thread Andy Graybeal
i'm having some problems with [msgfile].. this is the version i have: [msgfile] part of zexy-2.2.0 (compiled: Nov 19 2007) Copyright (l) 1999-2007 IOhannes m zm��lnig, forum::f��r::uml��ute & IEM i got it out of _hc's pd-extended cvs. the first time i put some data into the [msgfile]'s buffe

[PD] msgfile headroom 1024

2007-10-27 Thread marius schebella
Hi, I get this error on opening big files with msgfile. error: msgfile: read error (headroom 1024 too small!) textfile is working, though. marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/

[PD] msgfile bug

2007-09-04 Thread Ed Kelly
Hi all, this one's for IOhannes, (hey :D) The msgfile bug I found was this: When you do a [goto $1 ( followed by a [replace $1 ( message to an empty msgfile, PD crashes. Obviously it's trying to modify data that doesn't exist, but it would be nice to have an exception handler for this. Of cou

Re: [PD] [msgfile] previous bug abstraction too simple.

2007-03-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
marius schebella wrote: > and the msg file problem... > hmm, maybe give explicit messages. > I tried to replace the "bang" with [skip 1, this( and this seems to work it turned out to be a simple reentrancy problem, where the current list was output before the advance to the next list. i have fixe

Re: [PD] [msgfile] previous bug abstraction too simple.

2007-03-06 Thread marius schebella
David F. Place wrote: > However, I also want to > be able to seek a certain record without causing any output. That is > why I thought I could use [msgfile]'s goto message. Unfortunately, > [msgfile] doesn't work at all for the basic process. why not? there is also a spigot object, when you

Re: [PD] [msgfile] previous bug abstraction too simple.

2007-03-06 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, David F. Place hat gesagt: // David F. Place wrote: > In my previous message my abstraction was too simple. I can't use > [Until] after all. But maybe you can use [until]? You could stop the [until] through its right inlet whenever you get a "wait"-line in [textfile]. Then restart it aga

Re: [PD] [msgfile] previous bug abstraction too simple.

2007-03-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
hi David F. Place wrote: > Hi and thanks for your help so far. > > In my previous message my abstraction was too simple. I can't use > [Until] after all. the problem is the same and it can be resolved with [until]. see attached patch. > > You can see by the attached patch the behavior that I

[PD] [msgfile] previous bug abstraction too simple.

2007-03-06 Thread David F. Place
Hi and thanks for your help so far. In my previous message my abstraction was too simple. I can't use [Until] after all. You can see by the attached patch the behavior that I want using [textfile]. I want to output records until I find a wait, wait a bit, then continue. This works fine w

Re: [PD] [msgfile] and [textfile] problems.

2007-03-06 Thread Miller Puckette
I think making a stack size startup option would be a Good Thing and will stick it on my list... but I agree with other messages that it would be wiser to write the patch iteratively, especially since I'm not dead sure [textfile] is totally safe for re-entrant use. (I know of a reentrancy but in

Re: [PD] [msgfile] and [textfile] problems.

2007-03-06 Thread marius schebella
hi, the delay object has one small difference, that is that the messages will be processed one dsp cycle later. or at least the first delay 0 has that effect, then is seems to be whithin the same dsp cycle... (see attached patch). otoh, I don't think this makes a difference to davids needs. ma

Re: [PD] [msgfile] and [textfile] problems.

2007-03-06 Thread David F. Place
Thanks. [Until] fixes all problems. On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:52 AM, marius schebella wrote: > hi david, > don't know why the error occurs, but maybe you could use the > [until] object to solve it. > > [bang( [r bang when msgfile printout is finished] > | / > [until] > | > [msgfile] > |

Re: [PD] [msgfile] and [textfile] problems.

2007-03-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
David F. Place wrote: > Recently, I sent a message complaining about the behavior of > [textfile].I learned about [msgfile] in the zexy library and thought > it would solve my problems, but it has not. > > I have distilled my complaints in the attached patch. > 1.) [textfile] blows the stack

Re: [PD] [msgfile] and [textfile] problems.

2007-03-06 Thread marius schebella
btw for your josquin sequence I got an MSGFILE_HEADROOM error: read error (headroom 1024 too small!) this seems to be a limitation of the line length, which I don't understand why it has to be there... marius. David F. Place wrote: > Recently, I sent a message complaining about the behavior of >

Re: [PD] [msgfile] and [textfile] problems.

2007-03-06 Thread marius schebella
hi david, don't know why the error occurs, but maybe you could use the [until] object to solve it. [bang( [r bang when msgfile printout is finished] | / [until] | [msgfile] | \ [print] [send bang to right inlet of until when finished] marius. David F. Place wrote: > Recently, I

Re: [PD] [msgfile] and [textfile] problems.

2007-03-06 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, David F. Place hat gesagt: // David F. Place wrote: > Recently, I sent a message complaining about the behavior of > [textfile].I learned about [msgfile] in the zexy library and thought > it would solve my problems, but it has not. > > I have distilled my complaints in the attached p

Re: [PD] [msgfile] and [textfile] problems.

2007-03-06 Thread David F. Place
Whoops. Here are the versions: Pd 0.41 zexy 2.1 Fedore core 4 64-bits David F. Place wrote: > Recently, I sent a message complaining about the behavior of > [textfile].I learned about [msgfile] in the zexy library and > thought it would solve my problems, but it has not. > _

[PD] [msgfile] and [textfile] problems.

2007-03-06 Thread David F. Place
Recently, I sent a message complaining about the behavior of [textfile].I learned about [msgfile] in the zexy library and thought it would solve my problems, but it has not. I have distilled my complaints in the attached patch. 1.) [textfile] blows the stack on too low a number. The st

[PD] msgfile strangeness

2007-02-23 Thread Tim Boykett
Hi, I am using msgfile to get a dataset and some parameters into PD from another application. I understood that all I needed was file1.jpg 1 2 3; file2.jpg 3 4 2; file3.jpg 1 1 1; in a file, read it with read file.dat and I would have three entries in the msgfile. It seems that I need to ad

Re: [PD] msgfile busted?

2006-12-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Let's keep this on the list since its of general interest. On Dec 29, 2006, at 4:47 PM, timon wrote: Tried the powerpc release (should I try the G4++?Im working on a powerbook at the mo - not an intel one). Seems to have too many things not working. Not recognising l2s from old patches, al

Re: [PD] msgfile busted?

2006-12-28 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I forgot to mention, if it's still busted in test6, then please file a bug report: http://puredata.org/dev/bugtracker .hc On Dec 27, 2006, at 6:57 AM, timon wrote: Hi, Im trying to get msgfile to work on OSX 10.4.8 (G4) using HCS's PD 0.39.2 extended (test 4). No luck. Wont read, write o

Re: [PD] msgfile busted?

2006-12-28 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Could you try test6 and see if it is still broken? http://at.or.at/hans/pd/installers.html .hc On Dec 27, 2006, at 6:57 AM, timon wrote: Hi, Im trying to get msgfile to work on OSX 10.4.8 (G4) using HCS's PD 0.39.2 extended (test 4). No luck. Wont read, write or anything. Just printing [d

[PD] msgfile busted?

2006-12-27 Thread timon
Hi, Im trying to get msgfile to work on OSX 10.4.8 (G4) using HCS's PD 0.39.2 extended (test 4). No luck. Wont read, write or anything. Just printing [done] bang. Is there a known bug/break here? Cant find anything on the list... Thanks, Timon __