I only have little experience, but from what I've seen so far is that pitch
detection with sigmund~ is faster than fiddle~.
On the other hand I found the level setting 'minpower' not working or at least
nor responsive to changes that I tried out. I do not have experimented with the
correspondin
> But under the hood I think it uses a better algorithm. In my experiments it
> reports pitch faster and more reliable and stable than fiddle~. So if you
> can
> use sigmund~ I would recommend it over fiddle~ as a replacement.
>
Back in the LAC 2008 in Cologne, I asked Miller that very question: w
Hallo,
Jonathan Wilkes hat gesagt: // Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> --- On Mon, 12/7/09, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > Jonathan Wilkes hat gesagt: // Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> >
> > > Can [sigmund~] do everything [fiddle~] can do (or do
> > it better)?
> >
> > I leave the first part of the question as a
--- On Mon, 12/7/09, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> From: Frank Barknecht
> Subject: Re: [PD] [sigmund~] and [fiddle~]
> To: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Monday, December 7, 2009, 10:04 AM
> Hallo,
> Jonathan Wilkes hat gesagt: // Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
> > Can [sigmund~]
Hallo,
Jonathan Wilkes hat gesagt: // Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> Can [sigmund~] do everything [fiddle~] can do (or do it better)?
I leave the first part of the question as a task to the reader of both help
files.
About the second part: In my tests, [sigmund~] indeed did it better.
Ciao
--
Fran
Hello,
Can [sigmund~] do everything [fiddle~] can do (or do it better)?
BTW: I'm finding that to use [sigmund~] with tables, the "-t flag" is
unnecessary-- just remove it in the example in the subpatch and you
get the same results. Not sure if that's a bug or not, but it makes me
wonder:
