-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-01-08 19:47, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> ...Don't really get it. Anyway, it seems it came back to normal.
> For some reason it went crazy for some 20 minutes and settled back
> to what it's supposed to be doing. Hope I don't get this in a
>
From: Alexandros Drymonitis
> Well, it's full of [trigger]s..
[OT] -- h, why am i suddenly thinking "HAL, Dave, 2001" etc?
.pltk.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-lis
Damn! That was for the length of the letter G for [text2d]. Sorry for that.
Still the weird behavior didn't have to do with this, but as I said, it's
now gone.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Pierre-Olivier Boulant
wrote:
> You have a receive sharing the same name as in the example patch.
> It'
You have a receive sharing the same name as in the example patch.
It's in [pd rect-length] and it's [r G].
Not a very specific name... :)
On 08/01/2013 19:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
No, that's not the case. I've actually never really touched the
example patch. Anyway, my actual worry is w
...Don't really get it. Anyway, it seems it came back to normal. For some
reason it went crazy for some 20 minutes and settled back to what it's
supposed to be doing. Hope I don't get this in a couple of days during a
gig I have, crossing fingers..
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:43 PM, plutek wrote:
Well, it's full of [trigger]s..
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:25 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2013-01-08 19:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> > No, that's not the case. I've actually never really touched the
> > example patch. Anyway, my ac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-01-08 19:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> No, that's not the case. I've actually never really touched the
> example patch. Anyway, my actual worry is why these objects behave
> the way they do in my patch, which is really strange. In order to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-01-08 19:02, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> Just an addition to this, there's some more weird behavior. When I
> have my patch open, with no bangs sent to [link] or [mass], if I
> open the 01_basic.pd patch from pmpd's examples, I get "error:
>
