On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
After PdConv07 I just took a break and after that I wasn't able to put
myself back on the track.
I guess I know that feeling from my unfinished physics studies. ;) But
now I understand more
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Andy Farnell wrote:
I remember you explaining this before Mathieu, and it was with great
dismay that I realised DesireData was not to be an alternative to
pd-gui, but a complete rewrite of the whole show.
Well it was way too late to realise that,
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
well i guess this is the main problem with how Pd does it right now.
which was not meant to be defeatist.
i have no objection (so far :-)) basically on _what_ is communicated
between Pd nd Pd-gui. e.g. i don't have any real problems with the
server handling
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think there is a ton of potential to the ideas in desiredata and
things like the new editing tricks in pd-vanilla 0.42. But they also
have the large potential to cause harm to peoples' workflow. I hope
that
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think there is a ton of potential to the ideas in desiredata and
things like the new editing tricks in pd-vanilla 0.42. But they also
have the large potential to cause harm to peoples' workflow.
In desiredata, the workflow is almost
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I agree a lot here. I think, the automagic in 0.42 is the first time,
that something like that reached a wider audience. Desire Data was more
something cool to look at, but I doubt that many people managed to
actually install and use it a lot.
I remember you explaining this before Mathieu, and it was with
great dismay that I realised DesireData was not to be an
alternative to pd-gui, but a complete rewrite of the whole show.
It seems there is a necessary intermediate step by which
Pd is properly separated into two truly independent
Hallo,
Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I agree a lot here. I think, the automagic in 0.42 is the first time,
that something like that reached a wider audience. Desire Data was more
something cool to look at, but I doubt
Le 28 janv. 09 à 23:51, Frank Barknecht a écrit :
Hallo,
Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I agree a lot here. I think, the automagic in 0.42 is the first
time,
that something like that reached a wider audience. Desire
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Andy Farnell wrote:
I remember you explaining this before Mathieu, and it was with great
dismay that I realised DesireData was not to be an alternative to
pd-gui, but a complete rewrite of the whole show.
Well it was way too late to realise that, I rewrote much of the C
Hi,
what follows is a rant against the new automagic patching in 0.42 that
I tried for some time now with the result that I'm looking for a way
to switch it off completely as it makes Pd unusable for me as long as
it is enforced for every operation.
But first some quick remarks about the latest
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hi,
i agree wholeheartedly
fgamsdr
IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
monosemous
markus
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hi,
i agree wholeheartedly
fgamsdr
IOhannes
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:01:24 +0100
Frank Barknecht f...@footils.org wrote:
I quite often create objects
bottom-to-top.
This is the natural way to do it if you are working from
an equation or functional representation, someting of the
general form
f(t) = x + y * z
leads to an natural object
i haven't tried this new version of pd yet, but i know that if i did, i
would agree with the comments above.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hallo,
hard off hat gesagt: // hard off wrote:
i haven't tried this new version of pd yet, but i know that if i did, i
would agree with the comments above.
Try it! It contains lots of useful new stuff like pow~ and bugfixes and
I'm sure the automagic will evolve into a useful feature with a
i think i already said these 'enhancements'
were just a bad idea from the start
( see the status of desire data )
xiaooo,
sevy
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hi,
i agree wholeheartedly
fgamsdr
IOhannes
17 matches
Mail list logo
