Re: [PD] Workarounds for number truncation >6 digits?

2009-02-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Feb 25, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> I forgot to add, ideally we could fix the GUI stripping things down >> to 6 digits. Anyone have teh documentation on this issue? I >> looked around but couldn't find it. I think I

Re: [PD] Workarounds for number truncation >6 digits?

2009-02-25 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I forgot to add, ideally we could fix the GUI stripping things down to 6 digits. Anyone have teh documentation on this issue? I looked around but couldn't find it. I think IOhannes outlined it at one point. It's hidden deep inside. You'd t

Re: [PD] Workarounds for number truncation >6 digits?

2009-02-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I forgot to add, ideally we could fix the GUI stripping things down to 6 digits. Anyone have teh documentation on this issue? I looked around but couldn't find it. I think IOhannes outlined it at one point. .hc On Feb 24, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Florian Hollerweger wrote: > Hi, > > I'm picking

Re: [PD] Workarounds for number truncation >6 digits?

2009-02-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I did a similar thing with UNIX time in the past, I think I separated the number into something like "days" and "seconds". .hc On Feb 24, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Florian Hollerweger wrote: > Hi, > > I'm picking up a thread here from November last year: As IOhannes has > pointed out at > http://list

[PD] Workarounds for number truncation >6 digits?

2009-02-24 Thread Florian Hollerweger
Hi, I'm picking up a thread here from November last year: As IOhannes has pointed out at http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2008-11/065883.html the Pd editor truncates long numbers to 6 digits (which of course has nothing to do with Pd's floating point resolution). IOhannes has also n