Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread errordeveloper
so what you got there with /usr/lib/pd and doc/ in there ?? who does that belong to to whatever ..check it out and emerge --resume then .. ah, seems you got FEATURES=userpriv - so you might diasable thet .. but seems actually this a bug in the ebuild , it shouldn't try making that directory at

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread mescalinum
so what you got there with /usr/lib/pd and doc/ in there ?? who does that belong to to whatever ..check it out and emerge --resume then .. no way-.- ah, seems you got FEATURES=userpriv - so you might diasable thet .. but seems actually this a bug in the ebuild , it shouldn't try making

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread errordeveloper
the Makefiles in the pd CVS tree are very are definetly not good. they needs fixing globaly. who is responsible for the CVS ? i think that all of them have to be generalised ,so we can easiely build anything. i do everything manually on my system, cause quite a few makefiles try to use -m32 in

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the Makefiles in the pd CVS tree are very are definetly not good. they needs fixing globaly. who is responsible for the CVS ? nobody. the authors are responsible for their stuff. so: if zexy/src/Makefile is broken, it is my fault... i think that all of them have

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread mescalinum
the Makefiles in the pd CVS tree are very are definetly not good. they needs fixing globaly. who is responsible for the CVS ? i think that all of them have to be generalised ,so we can easiely build anything. i do everything manually on my system, cause quite a few makefiles try to use

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread errordeveloper
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 01:56:19PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the Makefiles in the pd CVS tree are very are definetly not good. they needs fixing globaly. who is responsible for the CVS ? nobody. the authors are responsible for their stuff. so: if

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread errordeveloper
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 04:59:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: heh, it would be a definitely GOOD THING to tidy up our build systems. but HOW? i think of having one Makeglobal which will contain DESTDIR, CFALGS , *FLAGS ..etc all the general variebles.. and procedures (or how do you

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also there is acouple of external which have duplicated objects. what do you mean here? nameclashes? duplicated functionality? aliases? yeah ..i can't remenber, but when i used my strategy: #' foreach pde (`find -iname '*.pd_linux'`) ln -s $pde

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
The Pd-extended Makefiles do use DESTDIR, CFLAGS, etc. but are only somewhat hierarchical. That stuff could be greatly improved for sure. Patches welcome :D I think that it autoconf/config.h should be the technique for handling libs and other dependencies. Perhaps automake would be