On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:36 PM, marius schebella wrote:
> hi,
>
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:57 PM, marius schebella wrote:
>>> Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, marius schebella wrote:
> declare -path oscx is also doing nothing. oh, wai
sorry to say, but this is not working either...
the object I am trying to create is [OSCroute].
I can create [oscx/OSCroute], but what I want to accomplish is to avoid
the oscx prefix, so I tried
[declare -stdpath extra/oscx]
[declare -stdpath oscx]
[declare -path extra/oscx]
[declare -path oscx]
hi,
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:57 PM, marius schebella wrote:
>
>> Roman Haefeli wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, marius schebella wrote:
>>>
declare -path oscx is also doing nothing. oh, wait!
>>>
>>> as written in the declare-help.pd, -path is rela
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 20:09 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:57 PM, marius schebella wrote:
>
> > Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, marius schebella wrote:
> >>
> >>> declare -path oscx is also doing nothing. oh, wait!
> >>
> >> as written in t
On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:57 PM, marius schebella wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, marius schebella wrote:
>>
>>> declare -path oscx is also doing nothing. oh, wait!
>>
>> as written in the declare-help.pd, -path is relative to pd, so you
>> have
>> to use:
>>
>> [
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 21:57 -0500, marius schebella wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, marius schebella wrote:
> >
> >> declare -path oscx is also doing nothing. oh, wait!
> >
> > as written in the declare-help.pd, -path is relative to pd, so you have
> > to use:
Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, marius schebella wrote:
>
>> declare -path oscx is also doing nothing. oh, wait!
>
> as written in the declare-help.pd, -path is relative to pd, so you have
> to use:
>
> [declare -path oscx] (assuming the folder is /extra/oscx)
>
> roma
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, marius schebella wrote:
> declare -path oscx is also doing nothing. oh, wait!
as written in the declare-help.pd, -path is relative to pd, so you have
to use:
[declare -path oscx] (assuming the folder is /extra/oscx)
roman
_
I am using 20080222. libdir is loading by default, so to me it looks as
import is broken.
otoh, there is no library oscx.pd_darwin, since in pdxt all
objectclasses are separate binaries. (OSCroute.pd_darwin). maybe that is
the reason why import oscx does not work? otoh (again), when I create
[i
Hallo!
> let's say I want to use OSCroute...
> I put an object [import oscx].
> but OSCroute ... couldn't create
> only oscx/OSCroute works, and then I can also use OSCroute.
> I can import OSCroute, but only after I imported oscx.
Okay, which pd-extended version do you use ?
I use the autobuild
hallo georg,
the problem is, that you have to remember in which library an object is,
no help patch uses import or declare, and at least for me they are not
working. I would like to use every object without having to add the prefix.
let's say I want to use OSCroute...
I put an object [import oscx
hi hans,
there are a lot of objects in pdxt that will not load by default,
because the libraries are not loaded in the beginning and there is no
path. I thought the idea of pdxt is that all objects are loadable. I
understand that there are some name conflicts, but right now, I would
say 50% of
12 matches
Mail list logo
