On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 12:04:31AM +, Andy Farnell wrote:
The slight difference is for [s~][r~] vs signal connections the order
of creation can change things. It's been discussed before in the context of
delay/resonator string models.
what is the difference between r~/s~ and
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
I think connections are slightly faster, but that is negligible. the
more important aspect is programming style/readability/layout/program
flow, and in this respect connections are definitely preferable.
Not always. Well placed
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:04:52 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 12:04:31AM +, Andy Farnell wrote:
The slight difference is for [s~][r~] vs signal connections the order
of creation can change things. It's been discussed before in the context of
delay/resonator string
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:58:31 +0100
Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:04:52 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what is the difference between r~/s~ and throw~/catch~ ?
[r~][s~] are one to one
Thankyou
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:41:07 +
Andy Farnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:58:31 +0100
Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:04:52 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what is the
Quoting Andy Farnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:58:31 +0100
Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:04:52 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what is the difference between r~/s~ and
Quoting Andy Farnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thankyou Frank. Remember we talked about problems that happen
using more than one [r~]. Was that to do with creation order?
Or is that something that only affects [throw~][catch~] pairs?
Maybe it was just me misusing [s~], if you create more than
one
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:57:23 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Andy Farnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thankyou Frank. Remember we talked about problems that happen
using more than one [r~]. Was that to do with creation order?
Or is that something that only affects [throw~][catch~] pairs?
Andy Farnell wrote:
Yes, I understand that Iohannes, the remark is about the behaviour
you get if you don't understand and misuse [s~][r~]. It surprised
ah, ok sorry for the repetition...
me that it accepted the instance and replaced the old one.
indeed it is not what i would have
What is faster in terms of patch loads and runtime performance, using
regular connections or sends?
I ask this as I have been developing objects with lots of sends inside of
them and I'm wondering if this
has any impact on patch performance ... even if I don't use more then half
of them? It
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Daniel Wilcox wrote:
What is faster in terms of patch loads and runtime performance, using
regular connections or sends? I ask this as I have been developing
objects with lots of sends inside of them and I'm wondering if this has
any impact on patch performance ... even
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:12:27 -0500
Daniel Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007 6:08 PM, Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Daniel Wilcox wrote:
What is faster in terms of patch loads and runtime performance, using
regular connections or sends? I
I think connections are slightly faster, but that is negligible. the
more important aspect is programming style/readability/layout/program
flow, and in this respect connections are definitely preferable. with
send/receive you end up with spaghetti code.
Maybe when working with a lot of
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:31 -0500, marius schebella wrote:
I think connections are slightly faster, but that is negligible. the
more important aspect is programming style/readability/layout/program
flow, and in this respect connections are definitely preferable. with
send/receive you end up
Well, it all comes down to style now if we've determined theres no speed
diff.
Right now I've been building my objects with both traditional inlets/outlets
as
well as send/recieve mirrors named on the object name, first creation arg
ala
Chris McCormick's s-abstractions.
So [rc-arp arp1] has a
15 matches
Mail list logo
