[PD] trigger: [t b 1 2]

hey, i find myself often repeating a construct like this: [t b a] | | [1 ( ... | now, the last time i was using Max, i noticed that Max's trigger object allows you to go [t 1 a] and the left outlet will send out the number 1. or even: [t reset a] and the left outlet sends out the

Re: [PD] trigger: [t b 1 2]

Damian Stewart wrote: hey, [t 1 a] i like this [t reset a] but i don't like this. it makes the bfsla syntax less readable: why does [t a b c] output c at the 3rd outlet, but neither a nor b on the 1st two outlets? (for those who don't like abbreviations: [trigger bang this float])

Re: [PD] trigger: [t b 1 2]

Hi Damian i like to use a list in your case since many objects map the list to the inlets. [1 $1( | [-] eni Damian Stewart wrote: hey, i find myself often repeating a construct like this: [t b a] | | [1 ( ... | now, the last time i was using Max, i noticed that Max's

Re: [PD] trigger: [t b 1 2]

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 05:48:45PM +0100, Damian Stewart wrote: hey, i find myself often repeating a construct like this: [t b a] | | [1 ( ... | why don't you just make some handy abstraction ? now, the last time i was using Max, i noticed that Max's trigger object allows you to

Re: [PD] trigger: [t b 1 2]

Le 21 nov. 08 à 18:07, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : Damian Stewart wrote: hey, [t 1 a] i like this [t reset a] but i don't like this. it makes the bfsla syntax less readable: why does [t a b c] output c at the 3rd outlet, but neither a nor b on the 1st two outlets? Maybe

Re: [PD] trigger: [t b 1 2]

Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Damian Stewart wrote: [t 1 a] i like this Me doesn't like it too much: Conceptually it clashes a bit with the possibility to replace f with a number in [pack]: [pack f f f f f f f f f] is almost the same as

Re: [PD] trigger: [t b 1 2]

Using a \ (or something else) in [trigger] or [pack] before a float or a symbol could force this to output ? In all cases, i think it is not to much to add a 'message' under a 'bang' from [trigger]. ++ Jack Le 21 nov. 08 à 19:25, Frank Barknecht a écrit : Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat

Re: [PD] trigger: [t b 1 2]

On Nov 21, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Damian Stewart wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 05:48:45PM +0100, Damian Stewart wrote: hey, i find myself often repeating a construct like this: [t b a] | | [1 ( ... | why don't you just make some handy abstraction ? cos