hm, there's also a [resofilt~] object in extended that implements moog
filtering ;)
2015-01-14 1:44 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres :
> well, maybe I got excited too soon, not much else shows up in the paper
> that can be related to the moog code...
>
> Well, I tried making a first draft in a p
Hi, F13.paf.control mentions the existence of a [paf~] extern that I guess
should be in the extra folder of vanilla, but it ain't there.
What happened to it?
The readme.txt in extra on vanilla mentions also about a link to download
it at http://www.crca.ucsd.edu/~tapel - but this link is dead.
T
I had put out an mf~ object as part of a seminar a few years ago, but
didn't take the time to clean it up for wider use. This morning I did
at least some cleanup and change the name to a more appropriate "bob~"
(named after Moog :) and have put a copy here:
http://msp.ucsd.edu/tmp/bob~.tgz
I'm c
I should fix this - I took down paf~ years ago when IRCAM complained.
But the patent it expired so I can put it up now if it's worth putting up.
But meanwhile, I'm not sure whether it's a good idea, since it's so easy
to make the paf~ out of simpler Pd objects. The only gain to having a
paf~ objec
Cool, do you mean one could do [paf~] with F13 example as an abstraction?
Cause F13 says the [paf~] external should work better, and I quote: "*The
frequency itself changes instantly, but the center/fundamental frequency
ratio waits for the next period. This gives a slight "chirp" if the
fundament
thanks, I vote for it being included in extra, anyone else :) ?
2015-01-14 18:18 GMT-02:00 Miller Puckette :
> I had put out an mf~ object as part of a seminar a few years ago, but
> didn't take the time to clean it up for wider use. This morning I did
> at least some cleanup and change the name
Is there anyone out there who could compile a Win32 version for me? I
need a patch to work cross-platform, and I can handle the Linux and
Darwin compiles but I don't have build access to a Windoze machine at
the moment.
Thanks for sharing this, Miller!
Joel
On 01/14/2015 02:18 PM, Miller Puc
I'll get it cross-compiled at some point - if I throw it in vanilla it'll
happen automatically, but if I end up figuring it's better left separate I'll
put it out as a self-contained muiltiplatform extern.
I'd be more disposed to put it in 'extra' if it ever works out
to include 'extra' objects
Oops... I can't be rigth in both places.
I think it's possible, but only using the "loop~" object from extra, which
probably didn't exist when I wrote the F13 example. That would imply I
should go fix up the example...
cheers
M
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 08:00:49PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres w
I can do it. If not this afternoon, in a day or two...
On 1/14/2015 3:25 PM, Joel Matthys wrote:
Is there anyone out there who could compile a Win32 version for me? I
need a patch to work cross-platform, and I can handle the Linux and
Darwin compiles but I don't have build access to a Windoze m
I compiled a pd_darwin version (not fat, just i386).
It's here: http://joel.matthysmusic.com/bob~.pd_darwin
Joel
On 01/14/2015 05:46 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
I'll get it cross-compiled at some point - if I throw it in vanilla it'll
happen automatically, but if I end up figuring it's better l
11 matches
Mail list logo
