Re: [PD] Cyclone future

Hi Fred Jan, On 22/02/16 03:35, Fred Jan Kraan wrote: This mail is the last I will write about cyclone in the foreseeable future. There are serious plans to save Pure Data and cyclone by adding numerous objects. As I don't seem to be able to communicate my vision on cyclone maintenance and

Re: [PD] one more filter

oops, ignore that comment about the lowpass and bandpass modes not working. It was my patching mistake. sorry! ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] one more filter

I seem to get the exact same output when using either of the 2 lowpass modes and the bandpass mode. Only the highpass seems different. On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:31 PM, i go bananas wrote: > looks great! thanks. > > just noticed that the highpass output is too hot. instead

Re: [PD] one more filter

looks great! thanks. just noticed that the highpass output is too hot. instead of multiplying the distortion outputs by [1, -2, 1, 0, 0 ] , you need to multiply by [0.5, -1, 0.5, 0, 0], then you get the same amplitude for the highpass as the other modes. I'm gonna see what it sounds like to

Re: [PD] Cyclone future

Howdy, looking ahead, here's the repository I'm starting to work with Flavio . As maintainers for cyclone, we're to provide builds for various platforms from this repo. Collaborators could fork it to make changes and then make pull requests for merging into

Re: [PD] How's Pd limited?

Hmm, i always thought that the dynamic creation and destruction of sound sources (oscillators etc.) pretty inconvenient in PD, compared to a source-code based approach. Maybe i missed some developments here, but the last time i checked (a year ago maybe), this was clearly quite a hassle, even

[PD] How's Pd limited?

Perhaps a bit of broad question, but I find it interesting in order to speculate about future additions. How do you think Pure Data is limited? ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->

[PD] Pd GUI elements as image files?

Anyone know if the Pd GUI elements would be available somewhere as those “frames” image files such as created by the Knobman application? ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->

Re: [PD] Cyclone future

2016-02-21 18:18 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : > > this is about the worst possible outcome of the entire discussion. Agreed There's nothing stating that all those objects need to be in the > one-and-only library named "cyclone". Yep, but there's some sense it'd be a good

Re: [PD] Cyclone future

> > There's nothing in the original project description about the following > goals of future development, but maybe we could discuss it and make it > explicit. > > A)- Ideally, objects should be kept updated to the functionalities > existent in the most to date Max/MSP versions > B)- Ideally, we

[PD] libpd: Is the multiple instance support such that could be utilised already using the C lib or will there be a more complete way of "managing instances"?

I’m participating in the development of Pd Pulp and was thinking of whether I could use the experimental multiple instance support already in a VST context. Any ideas? ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

OK, i update this info, thanks. ++ Jack Le 21/02/2016 19:27, IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit : >> Le 21/02/2016 15:03, Jonghyun Kim a écrit : GEM: ver: 0.93.git 60998f6 > > > On 02/21/2016 05:33 PM, Jack wrote: >> Good ! And yes, this is the official lastest version. > > > actually no. > >

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

On 02/21/2016 01:14 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote: > Would you recommended to to install externals by default package manager > such as apt-get or pacman? I'm not sure, but I thought the some packages on > default Ubuntu(14.04) server is a little old or outdated, but pd-deken is > an up-to-date-system

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

On 02/21/2016 01:39 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote: > > thanks for info. you are right. this is my result. it means the links > broken? how to re-link or fix it? thanks, jonghyun either install a package that provides libMagickCore.so.4 (but such a package *might* be uninstallable because it would break

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

> Le 21/02/2016 15:03, Jonghyun Kim a écrit : >> > GEM: ver: 0.93.git 60998f6 On 02/21/2016 05:33 PM, Jack wrote: > Good ! And yes, this is the official lastest version. actually no. i would not consider anything compiled from a non-release git to be the "official" version. also, the commit

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

Good ! And yes, this is the official lastest version. ++ Jack Le 21/02/2016 15:03, Jonghyun Kim a écrit : > Thanks jack! I think it installed properly. > > requested dependencies: > sudo apt-get install libmagick++-dev libv4l-dev ftgl-dev > > One question, is this version latest one right?

Re: [PD] "morphing" arrays in n seconds

hi list @Alexandre Torres Porres > well, you could interpolate in many ways depending on the > implementation/idea. i attached the patch @Matt Barber >"Simultaneously" just means at the same logical time, so you can use an >[until] loop to iterate over the tables. yes exactly. and then [route]

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

Thanks jack! I think it installed properly. requested dependencies: sudo apt-get install libmagick++-dev libv4l-dev ftgl-dev One question, is this version latest one right? Old one was 0.93.3, but this is "0.93" GEM: ver: 0.93.git 60998f6 GEM: compiled: Feb 21 2016 best, jonghyun On Sun, Feb

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

With : $ sudo apt-get install libftgl-dev ++ Jack Le 21/02/2016 14:14, Jonghyun Kim a écrit : > I've got error. How to fix it? > > == > libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I../../src > -DGEM_INTERNAL -DGLEW_BUILD -DGLEW_MX -DPD -g -O2 -freg-struct-return > -O3

[PD] libpd: Is there a way to check, whether a patch is opened in pd::PdBase or not?

It seems to me that libpd crashes if one closes a patch (PdBase::closePatch(patch)) and then something (such as a constantly running “processBlock” -loop) calls PdBase::processFloat (or any of the other process-functions). Therefore, is there a built-in way to check whether the patch is loaded

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

I have no this file on my computer. I tried it, but no file: $ sudo updatedb $ locate FTFont.h $ On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote: > I've got error. How to fix it? > > == > libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I../../src >

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

I've got error. How to fix it? == libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I../../src -DGEM_INTERNAL -DGLEW_BUILD -DGLEW_MX -DPD -g -O2 -freg-struct-return -O3 -falign-loops -falign-functions -falign-jumps -funroll-loops -ffast-math -mmmx -MT libBase_la-TextBaseFTGL.lo -MD -MP

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

Hello, If you want/need the last version of Gem (and if you are ok with a terminal) : $ git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/pd-gem/gem $ cd gem $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure $ make $ sudo make install Should do it. ++ Jack Le 21/02/2016 13:14, Jonghyun Kim a écrit : > why don't you install

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

> > to debug why a plugin won't load even though it is found, you can run: > $ ldd /path/to/plugin.so > (this will print out all the libraries the given binary needs to load; > if a library is not available on your system, it will be marked as "not > found") > thanks for info. you are right. this

Re: [PD] [pix_image] available image format on linux?

> > why don't you install gem via your package manager? > deken is mainly for people who cannot afford a decent systemwide > software management system. > Would you recommended to to install externals by default package manager such as apt-get or pacman? I'm not sure, but I thought the some

[PD] Nettles. Was: Cyclone: List of Issues with existing objects by Alexandre Porres

Hello all, Long time lurker, first time e-mailer. I get the digest version of these e-mails so apologies if I'm not responding to the thread correctly. I'm mostly active on the PD FB group and have been working with Alexandre on updating cyclone, I've done a control rate pong so far and I'm