Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.48-1 released

I tried to replicate this on a win10 machine using pd from the installer (only pd in this clean machine). I did [declare -stdpath iemlib] and then successfully created the [unsig~]. The console: tried C:/Users/Lucarda/AppData/Roaming/Pd/iemlib/unsig~.m_i386 and failed tried C:/Users/Lucarda/App

Re: [PD] factorial of negative values in [expr] / expr 0.56

As long as we're discussing bugs in expr, I found a new one in the newly added "Avg" function in 0.56, I just sent a fix, see https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/287 2018-01-09 18:41 GMT-03:00 Charles Z Henry : > > > On Jan 9, 2018 12:52 PM, "Alexandre Torres Porres" > wrote: > > Hi list

Re: [PD] pd-0.48.1 trouble getting started

Yep... the make step is decently fast. But I almost never just remake without for some reason having to reconfigure. This is probably because of my own file-hygeine habits which date from the 80s, so not relevant to anyone else. cheers Miller On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:55:46PM +0100, Dan Wilcox

Re: [PD] pd-0.48.1 trouble getting started

> On Jan 9, 2018, at 6:17 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:17:49 -0800 > From: Miller Puckette mailto:m...@ucsd.edu>> > To: IOhannes m zmoelnig mailto:zmoel...@iem.at>> > Cc: pd-list@lists.iem.at > Subject: Re: [PD] pd-0.48.1 troub

Re: [PD] factorial of negative values in [expr] / expr 0.56

On Jan 9, 2018 12:52 PM, "Alexandre Torres Porres" wrote: Hi list and Shahrokh. What do you think the output from factorial of negative values? I read it's supposed to be minus infinity. Anyway, here's a issue I'm reporting that factorial of negative values in [expr] output 0 and freeze Pd for a

[PD] factorial of negative values in [expr] / expr 0.56

Hi list and Shahrokh. What do you think the output from factorial of negative values? I read it's supposed to be minus infinity. Anyway, here's a issue I'm reporting that factorial of negative values in [expr] output 0 and freeze Pd for a while: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/284 an

Re: [PD] pd-0.48.1 trouble getting started

On 01/09/2018 06:17 PM, Miller Puckette wrote: > Yes, FYI I'm still using makefile.gnu. It takes about 25% as long to do the > job as the automake thing does, and when it fails I can usually figure out > why. > > I'll probably keep that possibliity alive as long as I can. thanks for the clarif

Re: [PD] pd-0.48.1 trouble getting started

Yes, FYI I'm still using makefile.gnu. It takes about 25% as long to do the job as the automake thing does, and when it fails I can usually figure out why. I'll probably keep that possibliity alive as long as I can. cheers Miller On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:49:17AM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrot

Re: [PD] pd-0.48.1 trouble getting started

you need to add yourself to the @audio group and set your security limits google it Patrick Pagano B.S, M.F.A Assistant Professor in Residence Digital Media & Design Web & Interactive Technologies University of Connecticut, Stamford (352)-226-2016 From: Pd-

Re: [PD] pd-0.48.1 trouble getting started

aha. I was simply (mistakenly) under the impression that one had to have super user priv to get the rt priority. I didn't know that running programs as root was so verboten. I'm not getting dropouts, I simply wanted to have all the goodies if need be. On 1/9/2018 9:49 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig

Re: [PD] pd-0.48.1 trouble getting started

On 2018-01-09 06:37, David Medine wrote: > This may have already been addressed and in my tendency to ignore pd > list traffic I missed the explanation, but here is what is going on. > > I am running a fairly fresh install of Fedora 26. I downloaded the > source to Pd, installed alsa-lib-devel and