Ah ha, wait a second, my apologies, I completely misunderstood this response.
Never mind - when I quit and restart Pd the behaviour is exactly the same on
Mac and Linux, and I now understand that this is how it should be. Previously I
was just closing the *patch* on Mac rather than quitting Pd
OK thanks, it’s good to know the expected behaviour. It certainly works that
way on Mac, but I’m reasonably certain that it is not working that way on Linux
(at least on the most recent version available on raspberry pi).
Images attached that show the behaviour on Linux - I launch the simple
Each time a [random] is created it gets a new (pseudo-random) seed - so if
you want total repeatability you should exit and restart Pd. Then you should
see exactly the same behavior on linux and on Mac.
cheers
Miller
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:04:15PM +0100, Yann Seznec wrote:
> Hi! Here's
In my next update of my libraries I wanna see if I can provide externals
for M1 macs.
I'm assuming I need an apple silicon computer for that, right? Since I
don't, I'll ask for someone who has one to help me.
Now, what's the next step, is pdlibbuilder ready for apple silicon macs?
I see zexy is
Hi! Here's thing I’m confused about…if I use [random] to generate some numbers
on startup, it appears to have different behaviour on macOS and on linux
(running on a raspberry pi).
With a very simple patch generate a stream of random numbers using [random]
(with no seed) and printing to
