Em seg., 4 de mai. de 2020 às 15:20, Roman Haefeli
escreveu:
> That's exactly how the big analog consoles do it.
well, that changes things :)
> Or maybe there is a
> decay, but a much quicker one, whereas for the peak there is a even a
> short hold time.
>
sorry, "a even a short hold time"?
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 13:58 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Em ter., 21 de abr. de 2020 às 05:33, Peter P. <
> peterpar...@fastmail.com> escreveu:
> > Have a look at the internal object [slope~] help patch. There is a
> > subpatch for peak-meter there.
>
> Now, the thing is that the peak
Em ter., 21 de abr. de 2020 às 05:33, Peter P.
escreveu:
> Have a look at the internal object [slope~] help patch. There is a
> subpatch for peak-meter there.
I now realize it's using the RMS display in [vu] instead of peak for that,
but it does look better.
I'm actually working on an update
There are also some simple channel faders: [g_chan] & [g_chan2]
> On Apr 21, 2020, at 10:31 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote:
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:03:14 +0200
> From: "Ingo" mailto:i...@miamiwave.com>>
> To: mailto:pd-list@l
* Claude Heiland-Allen [2020-04-21 16:27]:
> Hi,
>
> On 21/04/2020 12:20, Peter P. wrote:
> > * Ingo [2020-04-21 13:10]:
> > > Thanks, Peter!
> > >
> > > At the moment I cannot change to 0.50 but I'll keep it in mind for the
> > > near
> > > future when I will have to update my system.
> >
Hi,
On 21/04/2020 12:20, Peter P. wrote:
* Ingo [2020-04-21 13:10]:
Thanks, Peter!
At the moment I cannot change to 0.50 but I'll keep it in mind for the near
future when I will have to update my system.
Note that you could add entries for Debian testing in your
/etc/apt/sources list but
* Ingo [2020-04-21 13:10]:
> Thanks, Peter!
>
> At the moment I cannot change to 0.50 but I'll keep it in mind for the near
> future when I will have to update my system.
Note that you could add entries for Debian testing in your
/etc/apt/sources list but have your system default to stable by
> To: pd-list@lists.iem.at
> Subject: Re: [PD] VU / Peak Meter ? - external or abstraction
>
> * Peter P. [2020-04-21 10:23]:
> > * Ingo [2020-04-21 09:03]:
> > > Does anybody know of an accurate mono or stereo VU meter?
> > >
> > > Abstraction or ex
* Peter P. [2020-04-21 10:23]:
> * Ingo [2020-04-21 09:03]:
> > Does anybody know of an accurate mono or stereo VU meter?
> >
> > Abstraction or external.
> >
> >
> >
> > Using env~ with the Pd internal level meter works but I don't seem to have
> > any reference of the real peak or RMS
* Ingo [2020-04-21 09:03]:
> Does anybody know of an accurate mono or stereo VU meter?
>
> Abstraction or external.
>
>
>
> Using env~ with the Pd internal level meter works but I don't seem to have
> any reference of the real peak or RMS level.
>
>
>
> The only thing I could do is
Does anybody know of an accurate mono or stereo VU meter?
Abstraction or external.
Using env~ with the Pd internal level meter works but I don't seem to have
any reference of the real peak or RMS level.
The only thing I could do is sending some test signals from the SPDIF out to
my RME
11 matches
Mail list logo
