> The ghostscript people went ahead to write a new lightweight PDF
> interpreter called GhostPDF, independent from ghostscript. It seems
> (it is somewhat obscure) that Mupdf+Fitz is a proof of concept of that
> effort. I don't know if mupdf+fitz is still considered as a prototype
>
cl-pdf is another library for pdf generation. It is written in Common
Lisp and it has a freebsd style license.
http://www.fractalconcept.com/asp/mQG3/sdataQvAv8kImQIvQDM==/sdataQucgleAq9b==
There is also a link in order to use pdf forms with cl-pdf:
http://www.cl-user.net/asp/html-docs/p
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:25 PM, wrote:
> The ghostscript people went ahead to write a new lightweight PDF
> interpreter called GhostPDF, independent from ghostscript. It seems
> (it is somewhat obscure) that Mupdf+Fitz is a proof of concept of that
> effort. I don't know if mupdf+fitz is still c
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:15:27AM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2009/2/5 Sylvain Beucler :
> > - Any others? :)
>
> - podofo
> http://podofo.sourceforge.net/
> - multivalent
> http://multivalent.sourceforge.net/
> - libHaru
> http://libharu.org/wiki/Main_Page
> - Big Faceless Java PDF Li
2009/2/5 Sylvain Beucler :
> - Any others? :)
- podofo
http://podofo.sourceforge.net/
- multivalent
http://multivalent.sourceforge.net/
- libHaru
http://libharu.org/wiki/Main_Page
- Big Faceless Java PDF Library
http://big.faceless.org/products/pdf/index.jsp
- JagPDF
http://www.jagpdf.c
Hi Sylvain.
I'd like to start a wiki page to reference other PDF projects,
explain which one we could reuse and which ones we won't/can't (and
why).
It also explains part of the "goals and motivation" of the project:
a person on IRC was wondering why we were reimplementing from
Hi,
I'd like to start a wiki page to reference other PDF projects, explain
which one we could reuse and which ones we won't/can't (and why).
It also explains part of the "goals and motivation" of the project: a
person on IRC was wondering why we were reimplementing from scratch
rather than improv
