;mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx>; pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; perldl
> <mailto:pdl-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks
>
> This thread is interesting.
>
> I was wondering if anyone has ever seen speed
com>
Sent: 26 October 2021 08:57
To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com>
Cc: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx>;
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>;
perldl<mailto:pdl-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks
is Mochan <mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx>
> Sent: 03 October 2021 15:03
> To: pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>;
> perldl <mailto:pdl-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks
>
>
> Now I have run
Thank you for the independent measurement!
From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx>
Sent: 03 October 2021 15:03
To: pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>;
perldl<mailto:pdl-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmark
Now I have run the C benchmark and Ed's. My results are:
| Program | # iterations | time (s) | speed (K/s) | factor |
|--+--+--+-+|
| ansi c |150e6 | 133 | 1127.8195 | 1. |
| perl |1.5e6
tmail.com>
> Sent: 01 October 2021 12:30
> To: Boyd Duffee<mailto:boyd.duf...@gmail.com>
> Cc: perldl<mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>;
> perldl<mailto:pdl-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks
>
> Hi Boyd,
>
> The probl
;
Sent: 01 October 2021 12:30
To: Boyd Duffee<mailto:boyd.duf...@gmail.com>
Cc: perldl<mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>;
perldl<mailto:pdl-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks
Hi Boyd,
The problem as stated is difficult to do vectorised
.
Best regards,
Ed
From: Boyd Duffee<mailto:boyd.duf...@gmail.com>
Sent: 01 October 2021 07:27
To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com>
Cc: perldl<mailto:pdl-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net>;
perldl<mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks
I was t
use of
> threading!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> *From: *Ed .
> *Sent: *30 September 2021 16:38
> *To: *Luis Mochan ; perldl
> ; perldl
>
> *Subject: *RE: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks
>
>
>
> Hi Luis,
>
>
>
> That was very i
l<mailto:pdl-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net>;
perldl<mailto:pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks
Hi Luis,
That was very interesting in the part about Raku, and I think I agree with the
author’s comments about that language.
I have made a (so-far very naï
Hi Luis,
That was very interesting in the part about Raku, and I think I agree with the
author’s comments about that language.
I have made a (so-far very naïve) PDL version, visible at
https://github.com/Fourmilab/floating_point_benchmarks/pull/1/files?diff=unified&w=1.
This caused some diffic
11 matches
Mail list logo
