They say that in my home state (Ohio) a squirrel could start
at the center of the state and get to any state line without
touching the ground in the mid 1850's. Yeah, we're closing
the barn door after the horses got out and died of old age.
-Lon
William Robb wrote:
This is all very fine and dand
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, gfen wrote:
> Is this where I point out that the DA is apparantly
also a child of
the
> FAJ... no aperature ring, kids. Let the complaints
begin..now!
>
> Oh..."Its simple, functional design, coupled with
the elimination of an
> aperture ring, considerably improves the camera's
>Oh dear! I don't know what the hell to do now!
>
>Full frame, half frame, pro, semi pro, DA lenses, full frame lenses.
>Makes me wanna stop giving Pentax my money till I know where the hell
>they are heading.
Come on Rob, take the plunge. You know you want to!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
>These are lenses particularly suited for digital but it is not lenses with reduced
>image circle.
Typical of my trusted Pentax sources to get details wrong :-(
Pål
You guys are forgetting about the Great Plains, the breadbasket of the USA.
Stretching west from Chicago to the Rocky Mountains was a sea of grasslands.
Northern Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, the Dakotas and parts
of the states of Wisconsin, Missouri, and Colorado were never tree
I know someone who uses Leica gear. He has the 15mm Voigtlander, and is very
happy with it. I've seen some of his images on-line, and it seems an
impressively linear lens, sharp out to the edges. That being said, I don't
know what aperture he was using. But, he's a pretty picky guy, and if he's
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Brendan wrote:
> I have a feeling that the "PRO" Dslr will be 645
> sized, meaning the DA lenses are for the aps Dslr.
So, who knows enough about film planes, distance-to-film, etc to say if
that K mount compatability would theoretically live on in a K->645 adapter
to use those
> >Price: 2,499.99 USD . . . body only
> > P.S. Something tells me that this price won't stick when they begin
> > 'official sales.'
>
> Well, if it does stick, Pentax just shot themselves in the foot.
With a bazooka :-)
Regards,
Lukasz
===
ww
Am I correct in guessing that banner ad says 6. September is the
Japanese release date?
--
Kristian
>I had a brainstorm, which in my case might mean that my idea is all wet.
>Pentax should hire Tiger Woods to pitch the new DA lens line, the commercial
>would go something like this:
>
>Tiger walking along the fairway. The crowd starts chanting "you da man, you
>da man" Tiger goes into his golf bag
Maris, the town is Victoria, BC, Canada. Head west, and when you get to the
coast, get on the ferry and go further west. Many retired people, many
university students, and many artists, which accounts for all the art
galleries. Also lots of deer in the suburbs, a popular snack for the
cougars.
Sometimes, too many choices is a bad thing. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Oh dear! I don't know what the hell to do now!
Full frame, half frame, pro, semi pro, DA lenses, full frame lenses.
Makes me wanna stop giving Pentax my money till I know where the hell
they are heading.
Hell, I went through that about 1990, when folks didn't want
assembly language programmers anymore. It seems the older you
get, the less your ego cares about the "importance" of a job.
What's critical is: It pays enough to let you subsist, and
(equally important) it's not such a pain in the ass t
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, David Chang-Sang wrote:
> I'm disappointed that no images have been shown at higher than ISO 200.
> This makes me feel like there's nothing but trouble if you want to
> shoot at a higher ISO.
Why are people so paranoid? Official samples is designed to show off the
best quality
At 12:30 PM 8/4/2003 -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
> I've cleaned slides and negs on the non-emulsion slide with just a drop of
> distilled water on a swab. Seems safer
Yer a pansy I dump em into a sink of soapy water and wash em that
way.
Being a klutz I've dropped more than one roll o
Lens capability list:
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/ist-d/lens.html
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
I've muddled my way through a number of lean years myself, and I know where
you're coming from. Hang in there; things really do eventually work out if
you tough them out.
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August
If you can get a meter into the same light as the subject, an incident meter is better.
BR
"Otis C. Wright, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Would appreciate user input/recommendations on most effective light
>meter meter for low light indoor use. My amateur level experience is
>leading me t
If light *has* to strike the sensor at an oblique angle, it would logically
follow that the chip has a blind spot at the center. So this cannot be
right, Bob.
IMO, it's pretty obvious that a microlens has an acceptable angle of view.
Within which, the light will trigger the right response in the s
"Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Says...
>
>Availability: This item is not stocked or has been discontinued.
Man, I knew digital cameras became obsolete quickly but that's
ridiculous!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Hi Everyone,
Sounds like it just might work with K and screw mount
lenses after all.
I can't wait, my mouth is watering.
A fellow Pentaxian,
Ryan
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 07:45:32 -0400
From: "Kathleen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: *ist D Response from Pentax USA
Message
- Original Message -
From: "paddy audinarayanan"
Subject: Scratch on the new 24mm lens.
> Hi,
>
> I bought a new pentax SMC FA 24MM F2 AL{IF} from adoroma and just opened
> it and
> there seems to be a scratch and it seems to be continuous and can be
> seen only from the
> mount side.
- Original Message -
From: "collinb"
Subject: First Generation Issues
> The delay may be a good one.
> The *istD is essentially a 2nd-generation camera,
> hopefully with the bugs worked out.
> In Cord Camera yesterday a pro who had a D60
> and now had 3 10D's told of this issue:
> All 3
Another preview http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1060322400.html
Ziggy
You'll be sorry...
- Original Message -
From: "Pieter Kestelyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 2:11 PM
Subject: test
> Is this discussion list still up and running?
>
> _
>
Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Brendan wrote:
> >>
> >> DA lenses NO
> >
> >Why?
>
> 1 - It means a full-frame digital is probably not in the near future.
The specs say the body will have a KAF mount. To me that means it will
accept a number o
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> Appeared on dpreview. Nothing special - I thought it will have broader
> manual focusing ring... instead it has nice green ring near mount :-) But
> it's just first look. That's optical performance that will be most important
> to me :-) Adter all it
Hi,
Saturday, August 9, 2003, 9:55:28 PM, you wrote:
> That probably true because I'm pretty sure
> 1 kB =1024 bytes Thus 1000kB = 1.024 million bytes.
In the metric system 'kilo' is 1,000 and 'mega' is 1,000,000. It is only
the computer world that has confused things by treating kilo as 1024
an
På lørdag, 9. august 2003, kl. 20:19, skrev Mark Roberts:
"Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It should be fairly clear from the figure at the bottom that light
striking the CCD perpendicular to the array gets focused on the
sensor.
What is not sho
Maybe. Or somedays we have CCDs which are less dependant on parallel
light rays. Or they simply use Canon's software way.
Or one day when the manufacturing process was so advance those little
sensors on the chip could be positioned at an angle individually to
compensate.
I think, that this is on
This is generally true except for the following:
> course -- are designed to match the human eye.) I believe that the
> general
> strategy in designing antireflection coatings (like SMC) is to minimize
> the
> reflective loss of green light, since green is the color our eyes are
> most
> sensitiv
Hallo,
the smc-F 4-5.6 70-210 is a very good lens (with ED glas) and you can find
it in ebay for about 100 Euro.
regards
Rudiger
Von: Maris V. Lidaka Sr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Pentax's own FA80 f4.5 - 320 f5.6 - I think it was about $350 US
>
>Maris
>
>Артур Гроховский (Arthur D. Grokhovski) wrot
We're losing another, to Nikon this time.
dammit all. She _used_ to be a great picture
taker...
grin. Congratulations on your find. You don't
want that KX any more, I can give it a home.
-Lon
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Told a few of you about my treasure privately -
but going public now with my d
Might be, were talking Peentax PR dept here.
--- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On
9 Aug 2003 at 11:54, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
>
> > Why are people so paranoid? Official samples is
> designed to show off the
> > best quality the camera can produce. What else
> would you have chosen if
Staring, for hours at a time, at the inner tension and geometric
precision of a resolution chart always makes me weak in the knees.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is know way of getting around
the fact that large format is better
than medium format in terms of image
quality.
Says...
Availability: This item is not stocked or has been discontinued.
Regards,
Bob...
From: "William Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello gents,
>
> Well, you heard it here first . . .
>
> http://www.remodelingweb.com/ourStore/photo-1-3017941.shtml
>
> Price: 2,499.99 USD . . . bod
Good luck Frank.
Sometimes we just need to
take some time to reorganize our lives.
Be patient and positive.
Regards, Bob S.
Let's keep in mind that this is a Pre-Production model and that Pentax did
not include any manuals to Phil Askey for review so he may have missed some
functionality.
On the plus side from what I've seen: excellent metering range; RAW mode;
size and weight; 200 ISO (makes the F4 lenses make more se
Pål Jensen wrote:
> These are lenses particularly suited for digital but it is not lenses with
reduced image circle.
Hmmm, sure about that?
Dario Bonazza
www.aohc.it
39 matches
Mail list logo