I read that booting is one of the things this new virus does. I updated my
anti-virus definitions and got the patch today.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: July 31, 2003
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The bellows was never updated with A series contacts (which would
> have been a trick to accomplish anyway).
I have an Auto Bellows A. There are no A series contacts on it. Bob S.
While away in Scotland, I had a failure - my Manfrotto ballhead (486RC2)
jammed up and became almost unusable. I bought in January from
www.warehouseexpress.com based in Norwich, England. I contacted them and
was told to return the part with a covering letter and a copy of the
receipt, no returns n
Sorry to hear about your reversal of fortune, Frank. Try to stay
optimistic, it may work out better than you expect. Ten years ago, I left
my good job at the power company (Ontario Hydro) because of impending
large-scale layoffs. All I found was a horrible job, with a 25% pay cut.
Three years la
How to put a good spin on a worthless lens:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2944883056&category=4688
From: Rob Brigham
All Pentax Uk can tell me is that they do not have a confirmed price yet but
expect this to be £1000 - £1500. This shall be available from mid September
and dealers can place preliminary requests for them at this time.
So, not very helpful then!
To be fair I don't think they
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: Now We'll See
> Yeah, Baby!
>
> My MX goes to the grave with me. I must remember to put that in my will:
> Bury me with my MX.
>
> People will think I'm weird, but they do already...
As that cameras former owner, I'll drink
Bruce hits a new low. What was it that he was going to eat if Pentax
ever released a digital SLR. Does anyone remember? Talk about having
your head in the sand -- or in your ass. Open wide Brucey.
On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 07:19 PM, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Why start off with an apology to
From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It should be fairly clear from the figure at the bottom that light
striking
> the CCD perpendicular to the array gets focused on the sensor. What is
not
> shown is that light striking at an oblique angle will get focused adjacent
> to the sensor, not on
Hi Frank;
Good Luck. I'm in a similar situation in that it's getting harder to make a
livable income in my career field (photofinishing). I'm thinking of getting
out, but am not sure what I would do. As others have reminded you, you do
have the education to open some doors for you. One of the trui
På mandag, 11. august 2003, kl. 21:25, skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: http://www.secondlaw.com/six.html
"Entropy is not "disorder". No way. No how. That's an old 1890s idea
that was obsolete after statistical and quantum mechanics became fully
developed in chemistry. However, it hasn't yet been
While I agree with your assessment of the MX, in addition to my MX, I
also have two MGs. Nothing wrong with the bright viewfinder in them, either!
Both fine cameras.
keith whaley
Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> MR> If it's not that it's likely to be impractical to repair, though :(
>
> I see
The USB is probably more for uploading firmware updates than downloading
photos anyway, though I admit I wondered why they didn't put in a 2.0 port,
myself.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Anders Hultman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL P
Why start off with an apology to the list, instead of doing this off
line? You drooling, senile old jerk?
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, brucey boy. F. U!
My appoligies to the list, but this troll's personal attacks have finally
gotten to me.
Doesn't it have a pc connector? If so, it may support
analogue ttl.
Alan Chan wrote:
The Japan web site lists 500 & 360 only.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
does anybody knows which Flashes i can use with the ist-D. Is it like
with Canon that i can only use Flashes with E-TTL in this cas
unless they are confident of reaching sufficiently high resolution on the smaller
sensor to exceed 35mm resolution, given a sufficiently good lens. displacing 35mm film
is what the ist-D and successor DSLRs are about.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
William,
It seems the LXen aren't treating you well.
Have you considered switching to another body
as your go-to 35mm body?
-Lon
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Chan"
Subject: Re: Another *ist D Preview
It can't be me. PDML is the only list I am with. Really, if I
On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:24:55 -0700, Alan Chan wrote:
>The Japan web site lists 500 & 360 only.
>
>Alan Chan
>http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
>
>>does anybody knows which Flashes i can use with the ist-D. Is it like with
>>Canon that i can only use Flashes with E-TTL in this case P-TTL (that means
>
John Mustarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The ist-D will soon be on the store shelves. Hordes of PDML'ers are
>counting their pennies and watching their credit card limits in
>anticipation. When the wave of ist-D purchases hits PDML, we will
>see:
>
>1. Trash cans will overflow with keyboards s
I'm just waiting for someone to say:
"*ist D is too bloody small!"
;-)
DagT
> Fra: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pentaxistd/Images/sidebyside.jpg
>
> I can't believe how small that is!
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
Yeah, I think this may actually be is number 1 selling point to people
who arent already tied into the lens mount. A lot of people using
prosumer cams could well be put off DSLRs due to the size and weight of
the damn things. This is one of the main arguments behing the 4/3
system from olympus.
21 matches
Mail list logo