Maybe a company like Zoekr or Zork have adapters for this, but I doubt it.
It's hardly feasable, since the adapter might be more expensive than the
lens.
Better to sell the lenses and buy Canon lenses. Or even better; Sell the
plactic Rebel and get a stainless steel framed Pentax *ist D.
Adaptall
On Mar 13, 2005, at 7:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which of the three doesn't have to lock his/her trunk?
Nyah, not funny.
It almost is, but I spent half of my afternoon fitting a deadlock to
the wardrobe in which I keep my camera gear. I could have made a
better job, especially if the %*$$
Phase One LE. Cheap ( less than 100 USD) and very effecient.
And Don, digital photography IS very time consuming - at least compared to
bringing in a film and fetching beautiful prints the next day. End of
story - brilliant concept. But expensive over time.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) It does, no question about it. You can correct WB and exposure ( ac
couple of steps to either side) without quality loss in the computer, if
it's RAW. This means you can correct both brigghness and colour without
loosing image quality/information. Especially useful when you want to avoid
burned
Well I have tried a M 4/200mm on *ist D. Brilliant lens.
This one was done with the SMC Pentax-M 4/200mm and *ist D:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/6008407/
The K and M are not identical. The K has a 5-5 configuration and 58mm front
element, the M has a 6-5 configuration and a 52mm front
On 12/3/05, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Forgive me, but I have a friend who wants to attach
Pentax lenses to a (sorry!) Canon Rebel.
Is there such an adapter on the market? Does it permit
'auto' whatever?
There is not such an adapter on the market, and if there was, it would
not
On 12/3/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I dunno. I just make pictures and put them on the wall.
Bloody hell, too right. I've read enough about RAW conversions it makes
my eyes water.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
I'm looking into buying either the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 or the Tokina
80-200mm 2.8 lens (the Pentax version is way out of my price range). Do
any of you have thoughts on either of them? I shoot alot of action so
auto focus speed is really important to me. Thanks for your help,
-David
On 13/3/05, Jonas Schwab, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hello all pdml-people out there,
today I just want to say hello to everyone for I am quite new to Pentax.
But since I'm in, I really love taking photographs. It also seems that
there is some obvious progress... ;-)
Thanks for this list and
On 13/3/05, D. Glenn Arthur Jr., discombobulated, unleashed:
(Now if folks want musician jokes, I've got a large store
of those. Lucky for y'all I'm way too tired to speculate
on the reason musicians tell a lot of musician jokes but
none of us seem to know a lot of photographer jokes. Two
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:30:52 -0700, Tom C wrote:
All this makes me wonder several things...
Just for reference, I have been using the istD for just over
a year now, started out using JPG and TIFF and switched
to almost exclusively RAW after 3 or 4 months ...
(Using Photoshop CS)
1.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Senior moment -- naturally I can't convert a Pentax RAW with a Canon RAW
convertor, don't know what I was thinking. Or not thinking. All I have is Elements
3 that could convert it, so that wouldn't tell you much since you have that
too.
I know what I was
Rob Studdert wrote:
... however a corrupt file could be a problem if the camera isn't smart enough
to verify the file before updating its ROM ...
How common is that kind of problem? Does it depend on where the update is
downloaded from?
Peter
Hi,
Here's a test/study for an idle Sunday morning, designed to learn about sex
differences between
brains:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sex/add_user.shtml
It turns out that I have a woman's brain.
So which woman?
And who's got mine?
How did they all get swapped around like that in
Hi!
I have tested both Tokina and Sigma sometime ago. In the optical
quality (contrast, sharpness, and fine details transferring) I have found
that Sigma is much better. But it has a larger distortion and if you want to
use Sigma for city landscapes or architectural shooting may be
I added the following photograph today:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/6427556/
1/400 sec, F.8, 400 ASA
The releative lack of sharpness is - I believe - caused by the rather low
DOF, due to the long focal length (200mm).
Motion blur may contribute too.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13 Mar 2005 at 11:21, Peter Smekal wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote:
... however a corrupt file could be a problem if the camera isn't smart
enough
to verify the file before updating its ROM ...
How common is that kind of problem? Does it depend on where the update is
downloaded from?
On 13 Mar 2005 at 9:24, Jens Bladt wrote:
You can correct WB and exposure ( ac
couple of steps to either side) without quality loss in the computer, if
it's RAW. This means you can correct both brigghness and colour without
loosing image quality/information.
Like exposure colour can be
Hello Jonas.
Welcome to the PDML community!
PAW: is Photo A Week
PESO: is Photo Ever So Often.
I don't know your Tokina lens, but I know Tokina can make excellent lenses.
I have the F-4-5.6/70-210mm. Excellent lens, judged only in terms of a
rather slow consumer lens, but better than many
As I suggested earlier I have done test regarding the *ist D standard WB
settings, using C1 software:
The results are:
Sun pictogram: 6450 K
Shadowpictogram:9400 K
Cloudypictogram:8400 K
Neon pictogram(N): 7000 K**
Tungsten pictogram: 2650
I can't explain it but I know that for the compact
flourescent tubes I use the tungsten setting comes
closer than any of the flourescent ones!
Manual white balance is so easy it's what I use most often.
If I'm using flash or sometimes outdoors I'll use auto.
I've had little luck with the other
The K and M are not identical. The K has a 5-5 configuration and
58mm front element, the M has a 6-5 configuration and a 52mm front
element. So my guess is the K is optacally better (and quite rare
due to only 2 years vs. 7 years of production), but I'm only
guessing, here.
I really will
These are considerably different than what PSCS shows for the *istD as
well as what I recall from working with tungsten lights. For example,
PSCS shows *istD tunsten setting as 3050.
Jens Bladt wrote:
As I suggested earlier I have done test regarding the *ist D standard
WB
settings, using C1
The RAW converter (C1) has a setting for captured WB (click on the red
cross), which will activate the WB-setting your camera used to do the
photograph.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Tan and Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dr. Lisa and I are officially on for PDML UK on Saturday :)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
At 07:55 2005.03.13 -0500, you wrote:
From: David Volkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: 80-200mm 2.8 Lenses Thoughts
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I'm looking into buying either the
Back in the sixties my buddy Dave was
18 years old. Every Friday night he
would
do what every other teenager in Detroit did. He'd cruise the drive-in
restaurants on Gratiot and Woodward Avenues, testing his tire-smoking 427
Ford
in a street race
Sunday, March 13, 2005, 1:55:00 PM, Rob wrote:
RS On 13 Mar 2005 at 9:24, Jens Bladt wrote:
You can correct WB and exposure ( ac
couple of steps to either side) without quality loss in the computer, if
it's RAW. This means you can correct both brigghness and colour without
loosing image
Thanks for sharing Marco.
I like them all,but Norcal6 and 7 are my fav's.
The detail in what i think is a lathe is great.
Good conversion job to.
Dave Brooks
Finally had some time to work on a few more from the NorCal outing:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/norcal5.html
Wow, that's a long test!
I scored a 50 on the male side.
Plain old average, as usual. ;-/
Don (I'll still take the breasts though) ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 4:44 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT: Who's got my
JB **) This is odd, because for Neon Light the user guide says:
JB W (white):4200 K
JB N (neutral): 5000 K**
JB D (daylight): 6500 K
User guide of Pentax camera or CaptureOne software?
I have found out that the Kelvin temp values differ a lot in different
RAW conversion software for the
I have the manual focus version of the Tokina (ATX).
I like it a lot.
Don
-Original Message-
From: David Volkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 2:49 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: 80-200mm 2.8 Lenses Thoughts
I'm looking into buying either the
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/norcal/godfrey.html
Maybe this one's a little better.
Shel
Nicely exposed Shel.
Good shadow deatil. Is this from the istD you borrowed.?
Dave(can't see John or Bruce in the photo)Brooks :-)
CRB You can't go wrong with the Tokina.
CRB Solid construction and fine optics.
I have had bad luck with several 20-35/2.8 ATX tokina I tried - really
soft up to 5.6 (due to spherical aberation and coma)
Which was a pity - I would like that fast while compact lens.
It might be that all were bad
Saturday, March 12, 2005, 6:28:55 PM, mike wrote:
mw Hi,
mw Anyone know where I can get a Liyama (or is it Iiyama?) line output
mw transformer? They don't seem to be available in the UK 8-(
Have you tried will buy broken Iiyama ad in local computer sale
bazaar websites?
sorry for such a dumb
A couple more from the NorCal outing:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/norcal3.html
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/norcal4.html
-Marco
Both are very good Marco. I like the Norcal 4, and how the group seems to wrap
around.
Someone does
not
BB a full frame. At this, the NotNikonIt guy next to him almost fell to the
BB floor laughing. Pentax will have a full frame DSLR when pigs fly!, he
BB said. I said, I think they're trying to train them now.
ROTFLMAO ;-)
You are *witty* Bob.
BTW, if I remember from some reviews, the image
Thanks, Dave. It's OK (it's the second snap and pic I worked on). Yep,
it was with Bruce's camera. Bruce and John are nicely framed in Godfrey's
glasses, and I'm on the edge of his right lens and Patsy's on the edge of
his left lens.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 3/13/2005 2:42:02 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Here's a test/study for an idle Sunday morning, designed to learn about sex
differences between
brains:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sex/add_user.shtml
It turns out that I have a woman's
Thanks Dave.
On Mar 13, 2005, at 8:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back in the sixties my buddy Dave was 18 years old.
Every Friday night he
would
do what every other teenager in Detroit did. He'd cruise the drive-in
restaurants on Gratiot and Woodward Avenues, testing his
I have a blue filter that is intended for tungsten light with daylight
film. I'll try it on the *istD one of these days. However, I'm very
happy with RAW shot with the camera set to the tungsten icon. I usually
have to tweak the color a little bit on conversion, but I haven't seen
any
Are the 645 and 6x7 lenses interchangeable?
eg: could I use my 105mm for the 6x7 on a 645?
Kind regards
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
I also have the manual focus Tokina 80-200 AT-X as well as the 100-300
AT-X and like both of them. They produce good results for me and are
built like tanks (which means they are a bit heavy). I shoot my son's
soccer with mine with good results (www.cook-imaging.com). I have
wondered if AF
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - NorCal First Pic
Okay, I'll try it with the Canon RAW convertor, but since my
monitor is not
calibrated with a spyder, I doubt it will tell you much.
I bought a spyder, and discovered it does just as good a job as Adobe
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey Digiorgi
Subject: RE: Best all around RAW converter/manager(s)??
Regards the Pentax Lab software, I have it installed and used it as
a test once. I suppose it can replicate the camera's JPEG rendering
if you work at it, but why bother?
It depends on
This one time, at band camp, David Volkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking into buying either the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 or the Tokina
80-200mm 2.8 lens (the Pentax version is way out of my price range). Do
any of you have thoughts on either of them? I shoot alot of action so
auto focus
Hi Marnie...
I realize that about .jpgs... geez you must think I'm an idiot... :)
I was referring to the part of a workflow that automatically makes
adjustments to the image. Contrast, brightness, color, sharpening, etc.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
What? The man who wants his own Bridgeport, tired of tech talk?
Cotty wrote:
On 12/3/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I dunno. I just make pictures and put them on the wall.
Bloody hell, too right. I've read enough about RAW conversions it makes
my eyes water.
Cheers,
Cotty
Cotty wrote:
On 13/3/05, D. Glenn Arthur Jr., discombobulated, unleashed:
(Now if folks want musician jokes, I've got a large store
of those. Lucky for y'all I'm way too tired to speculate
on the reason musicians tell a lot of musician jokes but
none of us seem to know a lot of photographer
Thanks Cotty...that settles the question for good.
Appears my initial negative response to his question
was right.
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Forgive me, but I have a friend who wants to attach
Pentax lenses to a (sorry!) Canon
Nice photos.
I have the A200/4, seems yet an other optical formula as well. I
haven't done too much shooting with it yet, but it does seem an
excellent performer on the DS.
Godfrey
On Mar 13, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Well I have tried a M 4/200mm on *ist D. Brilliant lens.
This one
I've used the M200/4 extensively. I always thought it was an incredible
bargain, since it's not very expensive and it performs very well. I
used it for a lot of my wakeboarding pics.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2686457
On Mar 13, 2005, at 9:57 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Nice
Regards the Pentax Lab software, I have it installed and used it as a
test once. I suppose it can replicate the camera's JPEG rendering if
you work at it, but why bother?
It depends on if the person has forked over the grand for CS, doesn't
it?
I've been using Photoshop for so long that its
Well, I found it less biased than some, more based on real research (though
some of that reasearch is in debate). I couldn't do the finger measurement
thing because I don't use millimeters normally and can't convert inches in my
head
to millimeters.
I got 0%. Which I suppose means equally
Leica used to make nice straps. My Super A is wearing one:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/6437025/
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. marts 2005 02:40
Til:
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson
Subject: 645 - 6x7
Are the 645 and 6x7 lenses interchangeable?
eg: could I use my 105mm for the 6x7 on a 645?
You need an adaptor to put 6x7 lenses onto the 645, and you lose lens
automation.
645 lenses don't project a large enough image circle
Very nice, Paul. I remember you posted a few shots from this occation a
while back, right?
;-)
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 13. marts 2005 16:05
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
On 13/3/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dr. Lisa and I are officially on for PDML UK on Saturday :)
That's great news.
We might have a famous PDMLer from Germany coming over as well, can't say
too much at this stage..
Also, I've had a pleasant email from a British list
HAR! But, Bill, it does a much better job deleting your bank account.
Adobe Gamma is about like plain ground glass. The more one fiddles with it the
better your eye adjusts to the screen. Of course that is just the opposite of
what one wants. If one stops at the first match, they are pretty
Thanks, Dave. It's OK (it's the
second snap and pic I worked on). Yep,
it was with Bruce's camera. Bruce and John are nicely framed in Godfrey's
glasses, and I'm on the edge of his right lens and Patsy's on the edge of
his left lens.
Shel
D'oh.
Nice shot Peter.
I like how the vertical beams and the horizontal break wall work together. Nice
sky and
just a hint
of sun twinkle in the water.
Dave Brooks
Snowy day and technical problems made
me want to do something I enjoyed
doing so
here's
Yes, I have a page of them on PhotoNet. Sold a couple as stock as well.
Disregarding the screw mount lenses I used many years ago, the M 2004
has probably provided the best return of any of my lenses in terms of
cost vs. income. That's only important in that it helps buy more toys
:-)
On Mar
Both, to me anyway, are great.
I like the angle on the 1st one and the bark on the groovy needles is cool.
Dave
Two more shots from the recent NorCal trip.
These two will be the last I will
dribble out as PESOs. In a few days I post a link to a gallery of
Hey Steve.
For some reason, when the picture loaded, it started off as BW, then the RGB
was added
one layer
at a time.
It works for me as a BW shot. The yellow in the mantel is gone and its not
distracting at
all.
Just a thought.
Dave
Q: I find the
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Here's a test/study for an idle Sunday morning, designed to learn about sex
differences between
brains:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sex/add_user.shtml
It turns out that I have a woman's brain.
So which woman?
And who's got mine?
How did they all get swapped around like
This is another shot from the recent
NorCal PDML meet.
I don't normally take people shots, as in people that I don't know in public
places, or I take very few. I took more than usual at our meet.
Won the ebay auction Fred Widall pointed me to.
Shoppers here i come.LOL
Dave
When you get the replacement (apprx $32.00
US), run, don't walk, to the
nearest pharmacy and find the small rubber bands in the hair care
department. They are even
Hi,
Sunday, March 13, 2005, 3:08:39 PM, Eactivist wrote:
Well, I found it less biased than some, more based on real research (though
some of that reasearch is in debate). I couldn't do the finger measurement
thing because I don't use millimeters normally and can't convert inches in my
head
Now that's damning with faint praise.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - NorCal First Pic
Okay, I'll try it with the Canon RAW convertor, but since my monitor
is not
calibrated with a spyder, I doubt it will tell you much.
I bought a
Hi,
Also, I've had a pleasant email from a British list lurker who would
like to come along, and I have encouraged him to attend. On this track,
if there are any listers (active or not) who really would like to meet up
with a bunch of like minded friends, please please do come along and join
Yes, with an adapter. Just like you could use it on a k-mount. (It
won't work in reverse).
Kevin Waterson wrote:
Are the 645 and 6x7 lenses interchangeable?
eg: could I use my 105mm for the 6x7 on a 645?
Kind regards
Kevin
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:17:23 -0800 (PST), Rick Womer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are a couple dozen of the 300 or so shots I took
at last week's performances of The Music Man.
Wonderful photos. I'm sure the cast will be thrilled.
I learned the hard way that things appear in Photo.Net
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 13/3/05, D. Glenn Arthur Jr., discombobulated, unleashed:
(Now if folks want musician jokes, I've got a large store
of those. Lucky for y'all I'm way too tired to speculate
on the reason musicians tell a lot of musician jokes but
none of us seem to know a
Phil, shoot some nice horse photo's to sell! Then you're realy rocking*!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Phil McOrmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. marts 2005 16:17
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re:Justification
Anyone able to comment on the qualities of this lens. A couple have gone
for not too much on eBay recently.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=3879655938
Powell
On 13/3/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's a test/study for an idle Sunday morning, designed to learn about
sex differences between
brains:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sex/add_user.shtml
It turns out that I have a woman's brain.
I'm 50 to the male side. Average :-(
On 13/3/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Right, everybody. Keep quite about the initiation ceremony, but bring
plenty of extra molasses and some spare tubing.
Not to mention the air pump.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 08:54:56 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you know the stage is level?
The drool seeps out of both corners of the drummer's mouth.
Ah, the drummer joke. Gotta love those.
What do drummers and groupies have in common?
They both like to hang out with
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 08:27:35 -0600, William Robb wrote:
I bought a spyder, and discovered it does just as good a job as
Adobe Gamma for screen calibration.
That sounds like damning with faint praise.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Thanks to all who replied. I like this combination the best.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/11/05 12:17 PM
Hi Steve,
Here's a QD adjustment using gaussian
Cotty, you have the same brain as me
You poor, poor man!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 10:27 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: OT: Who's got my brain?
On 13/3/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's a
Mine's rather large and heavy but quite nice at 5.6 or smaller.
Pretty soft above 4.0.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Powell Hargrave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 10:29 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Vivitar 28mm f2
Anyone able to comment on the
Or perhaps there's a way to use some features of the Adobe RAW converter on
a TIFF file. It would be neat to use the vignetting control on a couple of
pics.
Shel
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: LONDON PDML
On 13/3/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Right, everybody. Keep quite about the initiation ceremony, but
bring
plenty of extra molasses and some spare tubing.
Not to mention the air pump.
My wife is British (from London,
New and improved with pics
http://www.cottysnaps.com/londonpdml2005.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I'd like to thank everyone who said nice things about this image, which
is just about everyone who commented. Not often I get one everyone likes,
and just because I can't leave well enough alone I decided to try a BW
conversion, (with a bit of perspective correction).
On 13/3/05, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, you have the same brain as me
You poor, poor man!
LOL maybe we're twins..
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I have the brain of a small boy, I keep in a jar of formaldehyde on my desk.
Don Sanderson wrote:
Cotty, you have the same brain as me
You poor, poor man!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 10:27 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re:
In a message dated 3/13/2005 7:43:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Both, to me anyway, are great.
I like the angle on the 1st one and the bark on the groovy needles is cool.
Dave
=
Thanks, Dave. I worked on getting the angle right on the window -- probably
more
In a message dated 3/13/2005 12:15:10 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Forgive me, but I have a friend who wants to attach
Pentax lenses to a (sorry!) Canon Rebel.
Is there such an adapter on the market? Does it permit
'auto' whatever?
Thanks,
Jack
=
Yes. But only M42
With the wonders of modern plastic surgery you shouldn't have to go without. :-)
I apparently have a balanced male-female, if not to bright, brain.
Dave S :-)
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:44:01 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I have her breasts as well?
.
--
Cheers,
Bob
In a message dated 3/13/2005 8:00:53 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I bought a spyder, and discovered it does just as good a job as Adobe
Gamma for screen calibration.
William Robb
If that is true, I certainly can save myself a lot of money.
Marnie :-)
The BW conversion is a much more interesting photo. What conversion
technique did you use? Perspective adjustments helps a bit, too.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to thank everyone who said nice things about this image, which
is just about
Both are reputed to be good. I have the Sigma and would say that it is
superb, even wide open.
The Sigma rates better on Photodo. You might query Photozone also.
According to Photodo, the Sigma is actually sharpest at the long end,
while the Tokina is sharper at 80 and 135 than at 200 -- but
In a message dated 3/13/2005 7:28:43 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HAR! But, Bill, it does a much better job deleting your bank account.
Adobe Gamma is about like plain ground glass. The more one fiddles with it
the
better your eye adjusts to the screen. Of course that is
A fellow was in an auto accident and suffered brain damage.
His doctor came to him and suggested a brain transplant. He said that he
could have a woman's brain for $200,000 and a man's brain for $500,000.
When asked about the great disparity in the price of brains, the doctor
replied, Oh,
I have to second that - I've been quite satisfied with my Sigma 70-200 f2.8.
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
That's true, sorry I couldn't find pictures...
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_95989.html?nav_src=newsIndexHeadline
David Savage wrote:
With the wonders of modern plastic surgery you shouldn't have to go without. :-)
I apparently have a balanced male-female, if not to bright, brain.
Dave S
This is what Cotty posted a while back, I thought it was in February but
it might have been earlier.
(These are Photoshop instructions).
Step 1. Flatten Image
Step 2. Create New Hue/Saturation Adjustment Layer with the following
properties:
Mode: Saturation
Hue: -180
I never wrote this!
I wrote:
Maybe a company like Zoekr or Zork have adapters for this, but I doubt it.
It's hardly feasable, since the adapter might be more expensive than the
lens. Better to sell the lenses and buy Canon lenses. Or even better; Sell
the
plastic Rebel and get a stainless steel
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
