Re: K100D SR

I bought an NSU RO 80 from the factory in 1970. The gear lever had a switch that opened the clutch. Gears could be changed very fast. It was also quite a fast car. On the autobahns I was able to do about 120 mph without much trouble. The top speed was supposed to be 117 mph but some of them cou

Re: K100D SR

Adam Maas wrote: >William Robb wrote: > > > >>- Original Message - >>From: "John Francis" >>Subject: Re: K100D SR >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do they put Tiptronics into Porsches? >>>As a matter of fact that's the only place you find one - >>> >>> >

Re: K100D SR

The Volkswagen beetle with semi-automatic gear box. Had an electronic clutch mechanism, (if you put enough force on the stick shift the clutch disengaged,. you could do it on the highway intentionally by hitting it with your knee), and a two speed (forward) one reverse gear box. The standard

RE: DL and K-lenses - "other than a"

Insult or not, of there's a profot in it , it will come. Other wise probably not. To me it seems PTTL works very well, judging from the built in flash. Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai

Re: K100D SR

Unfortunately they do now. William Robb wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "John Francis" >Subject: Re: K100D SR > > > > >>I want the car to shift for me, but only when I tell it to shift. >>I guess you might say I prefer a hyper-manual transmission :-) >> >> > >Do they put Tiptr

Re: GESO: 6 book covers

They can if you fire them out of a Cannon... John Francis wrote: >On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 04:39:33PM -0500, Bob Sullivan wrote: > > >>Bob W., >>Have you noticed that you cannot see the feet ofeither Daleks or Penguins. >>They both sweep across the floor with no visible locomotion... >> >> >

Re: Cartoon Effect

Someone else sent me this at one time. These "toys" look more real the pictures BC produces... Bob Shell wrote: >On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:25 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > > >>>Maybe not as extreme as BC's work, but the smooth as a Barbie dolls >>>complexion look is becoming more & more common.

Re: Adobe's cannibalizing Rawshooter

What version of WinXP. I tried to do that on a couple of peoples machines for them early on and it proved to be impossible... Adam Maas wrote: >Yep, Classic interface gives a standard Win95-style start button. > >-Adam > >Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > >>Sure you can. I did. >> >>Shel >> >> >>

Re: Peso A couple of flower pictures

- Original Message - From: "Kenneth Waller" Subject: Re: Peso A couple of flower pictures >> The FA200/4 Macro is a wonderful lens indeed. > > Just curious William, do you use the auto focus much? Not really. I've found for macro stuff, the AF never really knows what to focus on. Wi

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Hi Marnie Unfortunately the newer Elements versions don't run on Win98. However, now that I have XP, I'm thinking of inversting in Elements 4 (I currently use Elements 1 - quite adequate apart from lack of raw conversion). Cheers, Brian + Brian Walt

Re: Windoze versions and DS

It wasn't a test, so it wasn't repeated. Al I'm saying is that the LX with it's OTF metering worked better than expected and gave 36 perfectly exposed negatives in very low and changing light. I said nothing about saturated negs - I said that they were perfectly exposed. Shel > [Original Mess

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Works for me :-) 15 cameras and counting. And I'm on FA #2. Lovely camera to use, but not nearly as tough as the FE2/FM2 it's so closely related to. Horrid LCD in the viewfinder too (Just like the F3. One reason I'm liking the LX is the great viewfinder readout). -Adam Aaron Reynolds wrot

Re: RAW converters for OS X

On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:23 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote: > One thing I noticed about the Pentax Photo Lab software is that it > took care of hot pixels in a 3200 ISO image in a way that none of > the other programs I tried out did, without using a noise filter. > Does the camera "know" where its

Re: K100D SR

William Robb wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "John Francis" >Subject: Re: K100D SR > > > > > >>>Do they put Tiptronics into Porsches? >>> >>> >>As a matter of fact that's the only place you find one - >> >> > >Ah. >I thought I had seen a Volkswagon with a Tiptronic once. i

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Hah... funny you should mention it, I always liked the FA. My new rule is that whenever I get a camera I dislike I will sell it to Adam. -Aaron -Original Message- From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: Windoze versions and DS Date: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:54 pm Size: 1K To: Pent

Re: K100D SR

- Original Message - From: "John Francis" Subject: Re: K100D SR >> Do they put Tiptronics into Porsches? > > As a matter of fact that's the only place you find one - Ah. I thought I had seen a Volkswagon with a Tiptronic once. it was many (30 or so) years ago. William Robb -- P

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:44 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > Acros doesn't, out to the max Aperture Priority exposure the LX can do > (approx 120 seconds). Wish there was a colour equivalent. Well, finally -- 30 years on, and they make a film that can keep up with the camera. Maybe one day they'll make a

Re: K100D SR

John Francis wrote: >On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:02:24PM -0600, William Robb wrote: > > >>- Original Message - >>From: "John Francis" >>Subject: Re: K100D SR >> >> >> >> >>>I want the car to shift for me, but only when I tell it to shift. >>>I guess you might say I prefer a hyper-ma

Re: PESO - Time For... What?

Hi! > Interesting shot, Boris. Exposure and rendering are very nice. What > message were you trying to get across, however? > > Godfrey This time - none, really... Just a piece of crushed coffee cup breaking the rhythm of shadows and lights of bicycle parking lot... Boris -- PDML Pentax-Di

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Aaron Reynolds wrote: >On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:21 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > > > >>(Heck, the LX isn't >>officially mine until I get that SG-1 to Aaron, which will arrive >>tomorrow I hope). >> >> > >It's very telling that I'm keeping the ME Super over the LX, at least >to me. I value the size,

Re: K100D SR

It's Autostick on Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep. But again, no real clutch.But manual shifting of automatics is old hat. I can manually shift my '55 Chevy BelAir through the Powerglide's two speeds. It will hold first gear until I bump the lever. In the early days all automatics would hold the lowe

Re: RAW converters for OS X, was Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:36 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Do you have PSCS 1? It's just about as good as version 2 Nope, running Photoshop 7 still. When you have and need three licenses, you delay as long as humanly possible when upgrading. -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: K100D SR

> Do they put Tiptronics into Porsches? Yes, they have for years. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: K100D SR > > - Original Message - > From: "John Francis" > Subject: Re: K100D SR > > >> >> I want the car to shift

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Aaron Reynolds wrote: >On Jun 26, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > > Shoots at ISO's below 200. >>>That's useful - wish the D did. >>> >>> >>Ooops I hope the DS does >> >> > >It doesn't -- shooting at lower than 200 ISO does not, apparently, make >the

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:40 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > That depends entirely on the sensor's native ISO. Right -- I was explaining the specific case of the Pentax D cameras. -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Aaron Reynolds wrote: >On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > > >The LX does metered exposures past 30 seconds, > > Useful once in a blue moon >>>Unless you do a lot of long exposures, like Ralf. >>> >>> >>Sorry, but I also occa

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Aaron Reynolds wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > >>> Shoots at ISO's below 200. > >> > >> That's useful - wish the D did. > > > > Ooops I hope the DS does > > It doesn't -- shooting at lower than 200 ISO does not, apparently, make > the image any better. It's onl

Re: RAW converters for OS X, was Re: Windoze versions and DS

Hi Aaron, Do you have PSCS 1? It's just about as good as version 2. I have one at home, two at work. Version two adds some nice tweaks, but the results are pretty much the same. The upsizing from conversion is very good in both. You have to dodge and burn post conversion. But you can of course

Re: K100D SR

On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:02:24PM -0600, William Robb wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "John Francis" > Subject: Re: K100D SR > > > > > > I want the car to shift for me, but only when I tell it to shift. > > I guess you might say I prefer a hyper-manual transmission :-) > > D

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:27 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I once did a series of shots - 36 exposures - in a darkened room > except for > the flickering light of a TV set. The film was TX. All I did was set > the > LX to AUTO and let the camera do the rest. I paid no attention to > reciprocity n

Re: OT: 620 film

Dave -- I have a number of 620 spools and a darkbag, if you want to borrow and experiment. I've never re-rolled film myself, though I've always wanted to try my Vest Pocket Kodak Model B. I also have a case of vintage film in the basement if you want to go authentic. It was still quite useabl

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: >>> Shoots at ISO's below 200. >> >> That's useful - wish the D did. > > Ooops I hope the DS does It doesn't -- shooting at lower than 200 ISO does not, apparently, make the image any better. It's only of use for those doing long exposure wor

RAW converters for OS X, was Re: Windoze versions and DS

One thing I noticed about the Pentax Photo Lab software is that it took care of hot pixels in a 3200 ISO image in a way that none of the other programs I tried out did, without using a noise filter. Does the camera "know" where its weakest pixels are and somehow convey that information to the s

Re: If this keeps up, i'll have a number of digital cameras for sale soon

On Jun 26, 2006, at 5:06 PM, David J Brooks wrote: >> How about you show up with 7 or 8 photographers from the pdml to offer >> her 'complete coverage of the show' and blow the competition away? >> Road trip anybody??? >> 'Have digital, will travel...' >> Regards, Bob S. > > I LIKE IT.

Re: Windoze versions and DS

I once did a series of shots - 36 exposures - in a darkened room except for the flickering light of a TV set. The film was TX. All I did was set the LX to AUTO and let the camera do the rest. I paid no attention to reciprocity nor did I try to adjust or compensate the exposure in any way. The r

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: The LX does metered exposures past 30 seconds, >>> Useful once in a blue moon >> Unless you do a lot of long exposures, like Ralf. > > Sorry, but I also occasionally do work which requires very long > exposure times. Metering in such circu

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:21 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > (Heck, the LX isn't > officially mine until I get that SG-1 to Aaron, which will arrive > tomorrow I hope). It's very telling that I'm keeping the ME Super over the LX, at least to me. I value the size, weight, flash sync and noise advantages of

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Nope ... Shel > [Original Message] > From: Ann Sanfedele > > > Shoots at ISO's below 200. > > > > That's useful - wish the D did. > > Ooops I hope the DS does -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Windoze versions and DS

John Forbes wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:51:00 +0100, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > disappear. :-) > > > > > > The LX does metered exposures past 30 seconds, > > Useful once in a blue moon > > Hehe - even a new moon or a crescent moon :) > can adjust exposure during the ex

Re: GESO: Coyote Breakfast

Bob Sullivan wrote: > > Ann, > Thanks for looking. The thumbnails are not of my creation. The > originals are also resized from my originals to the 1028 pixel > dimension. I could go 1600 pixels, but this isn't a high art website. > Advantages are ease of use and 250MB free. > Regards, Bob S.

Re: K100D SR

- Original Message - From: "John Francis" Subject: Re: K100D SR > > I want the car to shift for me, but only when I tell it to shift. > I guess you might say I prefer a hyper-manual transmission :-) Do they put Tiptronics into Porsches? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li

Re: If this keeps up, i'll have a number of digital cameras for sale soon

- Original Message - From: "Tim Øsleby" Subject: RE: If this keeps up,i'll have a number of digital cameras for sale soon > Whatever you do, stay away from women ;-) Women are fine, just stay away from their husbands. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net ht

Re: [fun] " Great Photographers on the Internet" from MJ

frank theriault wrote: > > On 6/26/06, Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here is a real life version of that: > > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrerabelo/70458366 > > > > It is really hilarious. > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > -knarf > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois con

Re: If this keeps up, i'll have a number of digital cameras for salesoon

- Original Message - From: "graywolf" Subject: Re: If this keeps up, i'll have a number of digital cameras for salesoon > SIGH! Competition sucks. Apparently the handshake is not binding in > Canada anymore either. Sure it is. I'm in charge of a $70,000.00 home renovation at the momen

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Adam Maas wrote: >> Use a laptop instead of a 23" monitor, transferring your storage card >> to the computer to read it. Do it combined with focus bracketing. > > Yep, take 6lbs of gear instead of a few ounces. Not practical for most > people, especially since you're a

Re: Adobe's cannibalizing Rawshooter

Oh, yeah, you can use TWEAKUI.exe to do some interesting adjustments to your system and user interface very simply and easily. Tweakui is part of the Microsoft Power Toys collection. http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/tweakui Shel > [Original Message] > From: Shel Belinkoff > Something ver

Re: Adobe's cannibalizing Rawshooter

Something very simple to clean up the clutter is to right click on the desktop, when the fly out menu appears uncheck the box for "shoe desktop icon." Bada-bing the clutter is gone but you can bring the icons back should you so desire. I made a folder called Shortcuts, and put all the icons and s

Re: Cartoon Effect

On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:25 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> Maybe not as extreme as BC's work, but the smooth as a Barbie dolls >> complexion look is becoming more & more common. > > Ugly stuff. People want to become objects, evidently. For people who are into that: http://www.realdoll.com Bob -

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >On Jun 26, 2006, at 5:02 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > > > >>>Sorry, but I also occasionally do work which requires very long >>>exposure times. Metering in such circumstances is a nearly total >>>waste of time. Experience and bracketing are more useful. >>> >>> >>Except

Re: PESO - Time For... What?

My favorite ee cummings quote: "there is some shit I will not eat." Paul On Jun 26, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I like it Boris. I may have tried some other framing options and > positions, but that's not to say that I don't care for yours. > > Some people said, I think, that they d

Re: PESO - Time For... What?

I like this. Interesting, thought provoking, well composed and well exposed. Paul On Jun 26, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I like it Boris. I may have tried some other framing options and > positions, but that's not to say that I don't care for yours. > > Some people said, I think, t

Re: Cartoon Effect

On Jun 26, 2006, at 4:55 PM, David Savage wrote: > Maybe not as extreme as BC's work, but the smooth as a Barbie dolls > complexion look is becoming more & more common. Ugly stuff. People want to become objects, evidently. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net

Re: PUG Posts

On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:33 AM, Tom C wrote: > I think one has to make the differentiation between judging each > other and > judging a photograph. There is a difference even though it's often > hard for > one to separate themselves from their work. Yes. Comment should be on the photographs, n

Re: Exhibition: The Works, Edmonton AB

On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The Works Art & Design Festival in Edmonton runs from June 23 to > July 5, > and I have two photos on display at the Sutton Place Hotel as a > part of a > Canadian Photobloggers exhibit entitled, "Sharing Our Places". > > You can see our

Re: If this keeps up, i'll have a number of digital cameras for sale soon

Quoting Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dave, > How about you show up with 7 or 8 photographers from the pdml to offer > her 'complete coverage of the show' and blow the competition away? > Road trip anybody??? > 'Have digital, will travel...' > Regards, Bob S. I LIKE IT. Dave > >

Re: If this keeps up, i'll have a number of digital cameras for sale soon

Looks like, for some people anyway.:-( I did not want to have to do contracts, but looks like i have to. On a side note, the guy who took my job just prior to GFM had a TON of complaints about spooking horses and people were demanding he compensate them for lost money. I have never had that

Re: PESO - Time For... What?

Interesting shot, Boris. Exposure and rendering are very nice. What message were you trying to get across, however? Godfrey On Jun 26, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=14179 > > Honest and brutal comments are sought... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 5:02 PM, Adam Maas wrote: >> Sorry, but I also occasionally do work which requires very long >> exposure times. Metering in such circumstances is a nearly total >> waste of time. Experience and bracketing are more useful. > > Except with OTF metering. Then metering for such wo

Re: GESO: Coyote Breakfast

Ann, Thanks for looking. The thumbnails are not of my creation. The originals are also resized from my originals to the 1028 pixel dimension. I could go 1600 pixels, but this isn't a high art website. Advantages are ease of use and 250MB free. Regards, Bob S. On 6/26/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >On Jun 26, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > > > The LX does metered exposures past 30 seconds, >>>Useful once in a blue moon >>> >>> >>Unless you do a lot of long exposures, like Ralf. >> >> > >Sorry, but I also occasionally do work wh

Re: Windoze versions and DS

I went through similar trials with version 1 of Photo lab and Photobrowser with the DS on Windows98. And the fact that version 2 of the Pentax software didn't install on Win98 was truly annoying. In the end, though, it doesn't really matter. A card reader and a third party raw converter is all t

Re: Cartoon Effect

On 6/27/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:18 AM, David Savage wrote: > > > > > > > The no texture fake look. It can make even the most beautiful person > > look like crap. > > That's not digital photography's fault. That's

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Adam Maas wrote: >>> The LX does metered exposures past 30 seconds, >> Useful once in a blue moon > Unless you do a lot of long exposures, like Ralf. Sorry, but I also occasionally do work which requires very long exposure times. Metering in such circumstances is a

Re: K100D SR

On Jun 26, 2006, at 4:29 PM, John Francis wrote: > .. Put an MX and a *ist-D up, side by side, one to each eye (you'll > have to do that with the cameras in portrait position), each with > a 50mm lens fitted, and objects seen through the two viewfinders > *will* appear to be the same size (and w

Re: GESO: 6 book covers

On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 04:39:33PM -0500, Bob Sullivan wrote: > Bob W., > Have you noticed that you cannot see the feet ofeither Daleks or Penguins. > They both sweep across the floor with no visible locomotion... Ah, but penguins can't fly ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net htt

Re: PESO - Water Tank Lake

On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:55 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote: > http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html Nice! Like the colors and the scene. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: K100D SR

I think you're getting yourself very confused. Viewfinder magnification has absolutely nothing to do with sensor size. There's no such thing as a "life sized" viewfinder, because you're still just looking at an image projected on a small (24mm x 16mm or 36 x 24mm) screen. 100% magnification jus

Re: Adobe's cannibalizing Rawshooter

You can even get the garbage can off your desktop. I will admit that that sucker bothered me for years before I made the effort to learn how to get rid of it. -- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"

Re: Windoze versions and DS

John Forbes wrote: > > > > > >>The LX does metered exposures past 30 seconds, >> >> > >Useful once in a blue moon > > Unless you do a lot of long exposures, like Ralf. > > >>can adjust exposure during the exposure in Av mode. >> >> > >Only useful when doing very long exposures - on

Test was:: Cartoon Effect

Testing this reply as only 1-2 of my replies latly are getting through. Not in the archives either. ?? BTW love Looney Tunes stuff,you can keep your spongeboob Dave Quoting frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 6/26/06, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is the bull sniffing or snorting

RE: PESO - Time For... What?

I like it Boris. I may have tried some other framing options and positions, but that's not to say that I don't care for yours. Some people said, I think, that they didn't get it. Well, sometimes there's not much to get but a feeling or a sense of something other than what's on the screen or in a

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:51:00 +0100, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Forbes wrote: > >> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:04:58 +0100, mike wilson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2006/06/26 Mon PM 06:29:20 GMT To: "Pentax-Dis

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Ann Sanfedele wrote: >Paul Sorenson wrote: > > >>Sorry about that!! >> >>Don't know where I got the idea you were using a laptop. I don't like >>'em either - the keyboard's just too freakin' small for my hands and I >>keep hitting the wrong keys. >> >>-P >> >> > >All is forgiven -- the non-

Re: Adobe's cannibalizing Rawshooter

On Jun 26, 2006, at 2:16 PM, John Munro wrote: > I know how you feel - I'm a RP sucker plus an Adobe one also. I'm > hoping > Godfrey DiGiorgi will tell us how we're a winner in this. I don't use it, nor do I care one way or the other about it. They never cared about Mac OS X enough to bring

Re: If this keeps up, i'll have a number of digital cameras for sale soon

Quoting Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Design caps . > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce Probably better money to. Dave > > > Sunday, June 25, 2006, 9:39:14 PM, you wrote: > > bcin> Just went on a website of another horse > bcin> photographer, looking to see if they > bcin> shot any

Re: If this keeps up, i'll have a number of digital cameras for sale soon

Quoting Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I already drink, so thats out.:-) > > How about women? > > Kenneth Waller I have a week off next month, sounds good.:-) D > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:39 AM > Subject: If this k

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Paul Sorenson wrote: > > Sorry about that!! > > Don't know where I got the idea you were using a laptop. I don't like > 'em either - the keyboard's just too freakin' small for my hands and I > keep hitting the wrong keys. > > -P All is forgiven -- the non-mouse is what gets me -- it was hard e

Re: wanted to buy aka camera disaster

graywolf wrote: > > Welcome to the list, Ann. > > -- > graywolf > http://www.graywolfphoto.com > http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf > "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" > --- LOL! :) a > > Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > > Does that mean if I put my 50mm f 1.4 on th

RE: [fun] " Great Photographers on the Internet" from MJ

I'll get my wimple and my guitar, then. -- Cheers, Bob Altogether now! Dominique, nique, nique S'en allait tout simplement, Routier pauvre et chantant En tous chemins en tous lieux, II ne parle que du Bon Dieu. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: PESO - Water Tank Lake

Kenneth Waller wrote: > > Check out > > http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html > > Comments - yea/nay/otherwise. > > Why it pays to get up early. > > Kenneth Waller > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net Yo

Re: OT: The simple internet, was Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?

mike wilson wrote: > > as is built in, once or not at all. > > > > > > > > > Mike - earlier I wrote that the button wasn't in my Netscape > > 6.0 > > I don't have Netscape 6.0 I have netscape 4.6 - > > > > You may have been scratching your head over that one > > muttering > > "yesit is yes it is

Re: Windoze versions and DS

On Jun 26, 2006, at 1:49 PM, mike wilson wrote: >> 1) The range of adjustment available with the Pentax LAB on RAW files >> is almost exactly what the camera itself is capable of and provides >> very little improvement over what you can do in full resolution JPEG >> *** out of the camera. Other RA

Re: GESO: Coyote Breakfast

Bob Sullivan wrote: > > Here is a small gallery (13 slides) that I shot with an LX, > motordrive, and the A400/5.6 some 18 months ago. I had them scanned > as I thought they might be good web page content. With the Picasa web > stuff, it's easy to put them up on the web. > > http://picasaweb.go

Re: GESO: 6 book covers

Bob W wrote: > > The Doors of Perception is a very interesting book. Most people (of my > generation anyway) read it in their teens. > > I must say, Ann, I think your cover is overly literal, but perhaps Tim > is right and there is a different style of cover in the US. The cover > wouldn't really

Re: [fun] " Great Photographers on the Internet" from MJ

It is true, Bob. A few months ago I hanged out a little bit in that group, and those comments are typical. As Adam said, some posters there do create interesting images, that are at the same time accepted by the group. But the general rule is that what could be considered "art by committee" is wha

Re: Cartoon Effect

On 26/6/06, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed: >No wonder some men wants to buy a rubber dummies. You rang? -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml

Barcelona mini-PDML report

Last week I had the chance to meet Kostas here, in Barcelona, and it was thanks to the list so I would like to let you all know. We spent a couple of nice hours talking about football and photography, and walking a lot around the Gothic Quartier. Kostas kindly brought its MZ-S to BCN, along with i

Re: Windoze versions and DS

Most laptops nowadays have full-sized keyboards. Both my StinkPads do. -Adam Paul Sorenson wrote: >Sorry about that!! > >Don't know where I got the idea you were using a laptop. I don't like >'em either - the keyboard's just too freakin' small for my hands and I >keep hitting the wrong keys.

Re: K100D SR

On Jun 26, 2006, at 1:17 PM, John Francis wrote: > But, in any case, we seem to be getting some way from cameras :-) This list had something to do with cameras? G -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: PESO - wood structures

Bruce, To me, there are two main reasons for using Wings Platinum 2. 1. Cost. It's freeware. 2. An editing environment I really like. At least compared to Proshow Gold and Adobe Premiere. The only fault with the freeware version is of course that I cannot create a presentation suitable for sha

Re: GESO: 6 book covers

Tim Øsleby wrote: > > I knew those cowers where meant to promote your self as a cower designer. > > I've read Huxley (brave new world), but not that book. The others, no. > You may be onto something when you are explaining why they don't work for > me. I thought as much -- I think I've read e

RE: [fun] " Great Photographers on the Internet" from MJ

> > Bob, > > This is a rare occasion that I have to disagree with you. Okay, what > I really mean is that it's a rare occasion that I'll disagree with you > in public. > > Perhaps a few of the posters were in on the joke, but I wouldn't doubt > that many of them really were posting in earnest

Re: Windoze versions and DS

John Forbes wrote: >On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:04:58 +0100, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > > >>>From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Date: 2006/06/26 Mon PM 06:29:20 GMT >>>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" >>>Subject: Re: Windoze versions and DS >>> >>>Mike, >>> >>>I suspect that

RE: If this keeps up, i'll have a number of digital cameras for sale soon

Whatever you do, stay away from women ;-) Seriously Dave, this stinks. Hope you find an alternative. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -Original Message---

Re: [fun] " Great Photographers on the Internet" from MJ

Bob W wrote: >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>Behalf Of Juan Buhler >>Sent: 26 June 2006 21:27 >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>Subject: Re: [fun] " Great Photographers on the Internet" from MJ >> >>Here is a real life version of that: >> >>htt

Re: Adobe's cannibalizing Rawshooter

What big green start button?? Thibouille wrote: > Did it too ;) > > 2006/6/26, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Sure you can. I did. >> >> Shel >> >> >> >>> [Original Message] >>> From: P. J. Alling >>> Yes I know you can use a classic windows interface, >>> and you can disable all of the

RE: DL and K-lenses - "other than a"

Aztecs who crossed the Atlantic in stone canoes. -- Cheers, Bob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John Forbes > Sent: 26 June 2006 22:10 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: DL and K-lenses - "other than a" > > If your gre

Re: GESO: 6 book covers

Bob W., Have you noticed that you cannot see the feet ofeither Daleks or Penguins. They both sweep across the floor with no visible locomotion... Regards, Bob S.(Penguins had me early too, but I escaped!) On 6/26/06, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Doors of Perception is a very interes

Re: DL and K-lenses - "other than a"

Note that Metz did very recently come with a Metz 45 version allowing ETTL etc. Of course no PTTL rom Metz which is is an insult to Pentax IMO. 2006/6/26, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Woo-hoo ! > Thanks Lou! Great, so it works like the green button on the D! > I am very pleased. :-)) > > Now

Re: Adobe's cannibalizing Rawshooter

Yep, Classic interface gives a standard Win95-style start button. -Adam Shel Belinkoff wrote: >Sure you can. I did. > >Shel > > > > > >>[Original Message] >>From: P. J. Alling >> >> > > > >>Yes I know you can use a classic windows interface, >>and you can disable all of the big brothe

  1   2   3   4   >