Godfrey,
As I was trying to say, following your advice would mean I'd have to get
myself an *istDxxx or something like that. I'm still on film, there's
only two P&S digis around here (whereas one of them is an Oly C-5050,
which isn't P&S only).
Thel lens arrived yesterday, I'll try it and if i
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> You're right. Just looked again. It's now at $540 with almost two
> days to go. Five bids. Most of them from Europe. I warned the top
> bidder that shipping was about $50. Apparently, that's okay with him.
He has customs and VAT to worry about. My (pr
I was watching Hitchcock's Topaz last night and noticed a 6x7 (?) and
what looked like a bayonet 35mm. Any idea what these were?
Just curious,
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Any lens hood is a compromise on a zoom lens at some point or
> another. A tulip shaped hood gives a little more coverage than a
> barrel shaped hood, but only in a four-pronged shape that has edges
> which must be oriented correctly or you get vignet
The same kind of fault happened to me with my D and three different samples
of genuine smc Pentax-F 70-210 zoom lenses.
>From 70 to about 135, everything works fine. Past 135 up to 210 you cannot
make AF work properly, irrespectively of environment light, subject
contrast, etc. It doesn't hunt, it
There's a very good set of photos of the effects of Katrina by Thomas
Dworak on Slate at the moment
http://todayspictures.slate.com/20060825/
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of P. J. Alling
> Sent: 26 August 2006 15:59
Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They can leave the factory with film on the mirror and lens.
Not sure they leave the factory like this but I've had this with
practically all my scanners: film, flatbed, Nikon and Epson, various
models.
I've seen the same effect on the insides of
Perfectly normal operation at the Seraing (Belgium) coking plant:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/6506220
Comments and suggestins as always most welcome.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cam
Ralf, fascinating picture again! I can smell the NOx from my screen.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ralf R. Radermacher
Sent: 27 August, 2006 11:17 AM
To: Pentax Mailingliste
Subject: PESO: SNAFU
Perfectly normal operation at the
On 27/8/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>He has customs and VAT to worry about. My (probably conservative, has
>to be said) rule of thumb for the UK is 33% on the purchase + P&P;
>digital cameras may not have import duties though, they didn't last I
>checked, so only VAT.
that's very good. Most of your industrial photos leave me cold - it's
just not my kind of subject matter - but this one is very effective
and interesting.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ralf R. Radermacher
> Sent:
On 27/08/06, Ralf R. Radermacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure they leave the factory like this but I've had this with
> practically all my scanners: film, flatbed, Nikon and Epson, various
> models.
>
> I've seen the same effect on the insides of the windows in new cars. My
> father kept
Very Nice. Enjoyed the blog and the picture of Sami. If you wanted to
work on it some more, you might remove some of the background
distractions behind the type. Use your clone tool and extend the grass,
the pavement and the trees to cover the blue, yellow and green
thingamajiggies that are se
On Aug 27, 2006, at 12:12 AM, David Mann wrote:
> My brother-in-law spent some time as a cycle courier in London and
> he's told me a couple of interesting stories. While I'd love to get
> paid to ride a bike all day, I don't fancy doing so in the middle of
> any city.
Last time I was in London
Works fine if you fix the like break.
Try this:
http://tinyurl.com/o94t9
Bob
On Aug 27, 2006, at 2:51 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> It seems that link no longer works.
>
> Bob Shell wrote:
>
>> Is it real or is it Photoshop?
>>
>>
>> www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?
>> attachmentid=
That doesn't work either.
I get:
"Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please
notify the administrator"
Dave
On 8/27/06, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works fine if you fix the like break.
>
> Try this:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/o94t9
>
> Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discus
Bob Shell wrote:
>Works fine if you fix the like break.
>
>Try this:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/o94t9
Both that link and the original give me "Invalid Attachment specified.
If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator"
--
Mark Roberts Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
41
I made some quick and dirty lens comparison shots last week (DA16-45
vs A20/2.8 and A24/2.8) but I have no time to pare them down nor a
place to put them temporarily for DL. So does anyone have 24MB of web
space free that would be willing to host a zip file full of JPGs?
Please let me know if you c
Cotty wrote:
> On 27/8/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> He has customs and VAT to worry about. My (probably conservative, has
>> to be said) rule of thumb for the UK is 33% on the purchase + P&P;
>> digital cameras may not have import duties though, they didn't last I
Must be a problem with your system. Both work just fine for me.
Bob
On Aug 27, 2006, at 8:24 AM, David Savage wrote:
> That doesn't work either.
>
> I get:
>
> "Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please
> notify the administrator"
>
> Dave
>
> On 8/27/06, Bob Shell <[EM
On 24/08/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excellent. look forward to seeing the results. I'll have to see how
> much displacement my barrel shows when I have time. I know there is
> some. The 12-24, on the other hand, doesn't extend very far and shows
> virtually no movement. It's a
On 27/08/06, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Must be a problem with your system. Both work just fine for me.
Neither link works for me either, but nor am I a member of the board.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.sw
Hi guys
Not that I've been particularly active on the list recently but I'm going on
vacation and un-subbing for a week. See you after Labor day (US Holiday)
Hopefully will have some pictures
Play nice :)
Butch
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Neither work for me either, and I am a site member, perhaps they live on
in yur browser cache?
-Adam
Bob Shell wrote:
> Must be a problem with your system. Both work just fine for me.
>
> Bob
>
> On Aug 27, 2006, at 8:24 AM, David Savage wrote:
>
>
>>That doesn't work either.
>>
>>I get:
>
Bob Shell wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2006, at 12:12 AM, David Mann wrote:
>
>
>>My brother-in-law spent some time as a cycle courier in London and
>>he's told me a couple of interesting stories. While I'd love to get
>>paid to ride a bike all day, I don't fancy doing so in the middle of
>>any city.
>
Last night I also found the links not to work, but was able to find
the pics and info by manually navigating to the RFF News forum and
reading the thread there (and I'm not a member). Trying the same
thing now, it appears that that thread has disappeared there.
-Marco
On Aug 27, 2006,
P.S. A Stereo Realist and a Fuji Instax
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Anthony Farr
> Sent: Saturday, 26 August 2006 10:59 PM
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: Useless gearhead quiz (was - venting)
>
> These are camer
Doing some office cleaning this weekend and stumbled across these in
one of my filing cabinets. Thought I should offer them here first
before putting on eBay.
Pentax 6 X 7 instruction manual (mirror lockup version). Like new.
Pentax 645 instruction manual. (I have two, one like new, on scuf
Makes me cough. ;-)
Jack
--- "Ralf R. Radermacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perfectly normal operation at the Seraing (Belgium) coking plant:
>
> http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/6506220
>
> Comments and suggestins as always most welcome.
>
> Ralf
>
> --
> Ralf R.
In a message dated 8/27/2006 7:34:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
P.S. A Stereo Realist and a Fuji Instax
I probably should test that my Stereo Realist still works, while there is
still a lab around that can handle it.
Did they use ordinary 35mm film? That's sort
Adam Maas wrote:
>Neither work for me either, and I am a site member, perhaps they live on
>in yur browser cache?
That's probably what's happening.
--
Mark Roberts Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailma
Yes, a standard 35mm cassette will fit, with no special loading
requirements. That Realist sorely tested my honesty as it was an unloved
orphan at the workplace - nobody would have missed it, and yet I found it to
be a fine piece of machinery. If I had one today there is no question that
I'd be s
I always get out on the curb side. I would never get out on the
other side unless there was a compelling reason and I looked
carefully. This idiot was trying to zoom past the cab in the foot or
so of space twixt cab and curb.
Bob
On Aug 27, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
> You don't
I know about the RD-1, of course. $3000 is still too much for a 6 MP camera...
j
On 8/26/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juan Buhler wrote:
> > The viewfinder alone is the reason I've been shooting more film lately.
> >
> > But at $5000, it will be hard for me to justify. I'll most pro
Ah, in that case I apologize for my assumption. That was a classic case
of why Couriers make life difficult for other cyclists (And everyone else).
-Adam
Bob Shell wrote:
> I always get out on the curb side. I would never get out on the
> other side unless there was a compelling reason and I
--- Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/08/06, Brendan MacRae
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anybody for taking your Coolscan 9000 apart?
> >
> >
>
http://www.marginalsoftware.com/LS8000Notes/cleaning_the_optics_of_the_ls.htm
>
> 8000 perhaps?
>
>
http://home.swiftdsl.com
Thanks, Godfrey.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brendan,
>
> I used to have the FA28-105/3.2-4.5 AL IF. Never had
> any issues with
> focusing. Several people told me that they had
> problems with that
> lens, but mine worked flawlessly.
>
> Godfrey
>
> On Aug
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/totally.shtml
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
You can hand them to me, I'd happily post the file on my web site (and
look at the tests!).
Patrice
Digital Image Studio a écrit :
> I made some quick and dirty lens comparison shots last week (DA16-45
> vs A20/2.8 and A24/2.8) but I have no time to pare them down nor a
> place to put them tempo
--- Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The same kind of fault happened to me with my D and
> three different samples
> of genuine smc Pentax-F 70-210 zoom lenses.
> >From 70 to about 135, everything works fine. Past
> 135 up to 210 you cannot
> make AF work properly, irrespectively of en
On Aug 27, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
> Ah, in that case I apologize for my assumption. That was a classic
> case
> of why Couriers make life difficult for other cyclists (And
> everyone else).
>
> -Adam
>
No apology needed. I should have written my post more clearly. I
was sor
--- "Ralf R. Radermacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > They can leave the factory with film on the mirror
> and lens.
>
> Not sure they leave the factory like this but I've
> had this with
> practically all my scanners: film, flatbed, Nikon
>
Bob,
I thought Thomas Dworzak's photos were hit & miss.
We here in the USA have all been indundated by nightly video of the
misery and squallor of those who could not or did not evacuate the
city of New Orleans.
I liked the interactive essay by Larry Towell much better. It put a
real scale to th
Was that the kerbside door, or the roadside door? It's normally
considered polite (and sensible) to look behind you before you open
the roadside door. If it was the kerbside door then the cyclist
probably got what he deserved. An experienced cyclist should of course
allow more than a door's width w
Nope. I cleared the cache and both still work. The tinyurl address
would not have been cached, anyway, because I only made it today when
I saw the post about the full URL not working.
Bob
On Aug 27, 2006, at 9:58 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
> Neither work for me either, and I am a site member, pe
On Aug 27, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Bob W wrote:
> Was that the kerbside door, or the roadside door? It's normally
> considered polite (and sensible) to look behind you before you open
> the roadside door. If it was the kerbside door then the cyclist
> probably got what he deserved. An experienced cycli
>
> Kerbside, or curbside as we Yanks would say. I wouldn't get out on
> the other side unless I was forced to for some reason. I don't like
> dodging cars in London.
>
> Habits are hard to break, so after almost getting hit on my first
> trip to England years ago, I started making a habit o
still "Invalid attachment specified...notify administrator"
Regards, Bob S.
On 8/27/06, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope. I cleared the cache and both still work. The tinyurl address
> would not have been cached, anyway, because I only made it today when
> I saw the post about the fu
Same here, "invalid..."
-Brendan
--- Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> still "Invalid attachment specified...notify
> administrator"
> Regards, Bob S.
>
> On 8/27/06, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nope. I cleared the cache and both still work.
> The tinyurl address
> > wou
Rob,
If still needed, - it can be done here.
Contact me off the list.
Igor
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 05:44:56 -0700
Digital Image Studio wrote:
OT: Anyone have 24MB of web space free?
I made some quick and dirty lens comparison shots last week (DA16-45
vs A20/2.8 and A24/2.8) but I have no time to par
On Aug 27, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> still "Invalid attachment specified...notify administrator"
> Regards, Bob S.
OK, I downloaded it and put the damned thing in my PESO folder. Here
it is:
http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/m8.jpg
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.
On Aug 27, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Bob W wrote:
> I know. The first time I ever drove in France I found myself on a
> collision course with someone and was cursing at swearing at the idiot
> for driving on the wrong side of the road, flashing his lights at me,
> when it dawned on me who the idiot was.
Weird how this list works. I downloaded the supposed M8 Digital
image, tweaked it to have some shadow detail, and posted it on my web
site in my PESO file at:
http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/m8.jpg
I sent a note saying so. That note has not shown up on the list, but
another that I answered w
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> The '1.5x crop' sensor format was chosen as a reasonable compromise
Nah, not chosen. Dictated by economics.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bob Shell wrote:
>Weird how this list works. I downloaded the supposed M8 Digital
>image, tweaked it to have some shadow detail, and posted it on my web
>site in my PESO file at:
>
>http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/m8.jpg
>
>I sent a note saying so. That note has not shown up on the list, but
Adam Maas wrote:
> The only complaints about crop factors and telephoto's I've run acros
> are about 85's. Not many people are happy that their uber-pricey
> portrait tele's are now too long for general use and the 50's don't have
> the bokeh of those 85's. The biggest complainers seem to be the
They do things differently there*.
But apparently the mobile phones are much the same.
I found the time travel option on my digital camera menu today, so I
thought I'd give it a try:
http://www.web-options.com/Extras/
It seems to work ok.
Cheers,
H G Bob
*L P Hartley "The Go-Between"
--
P
On 8/27/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's just propagation of the outgoing messages from the list server,
> passing through the swirls and eddies of the Internet on their way to
> you...
>
Maybe the tubes are clogged.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
On 8/27/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's just propagation of the outgoing messages from the list server,
> passing through the swirls and eddies of the Internet on their way > to you...
Swirls and eddies? Those are class 5 rapids out there. With rabid
alligators in the water. :-)
On Aug 27, 2006, at 1:25 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>> Any lens hood is a compromise on a zoom lens at some point or
>> another. A tulip shaped hood gives a little more coverage than a
>> barrel shaped hood, but only in a four-pronged shape that has edges
>> which must be oriented correctly
That option is on page 235 of my cameras reference manual, but for some
reason it will not print out anything beyond page 234. Therefore I have
been unable to figure out how to use it.
Niffy photos, Bob.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof
No question: for a film SLR, buy the Pentax standard hood. It's the
most convenient in use.
I tested the 24-90 briefly and bought the 28-105/3.2-4.5 instead due
to the difference in price, but after a while I found that the
28-105's shortcomings when wide open at the longer tele settings
w
I would bet that it's an issue particular to specific lenses used
with the *ist D series bodies. The DSLR bodies, at least until the K
series came out, seem to have somewhat more sensitive/finicky servo
drive motors and AF sensing algorithms. Lenses vary, unit by unit, in
the friction of th
I have space if you're still looking. Let me know.
Godfrey
On Aug 27, 2006, at 5:41 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> I made some quick and dirty lens comparison shots last week (DA16-45
> vs A20/2.8 and A24/2.8) but I have no time to pare them down nor a
> place to put them temporarily for DL.
Internet paths are a drunkard's walk. One email may go directly from a
to b, another may go from a to z to h to g to y to k to e to r to b.
Obviously the first message would arrive sooner than the second. It
works amazingly well unless some server along the way accepts the
message and then cras
> From all reports I've heard so far, the K100D's AF
> servo is much
> more positive and higher powered in operation, which
> should mean that
> variances in the lenses will no longer be so much of
> an issue. I
> wouldn't worry too much about the K10D ... if it
> proves to have *at
> lea
On Aug 27, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>
>> The '1.5x crop' sensor format was chosen as a reasonable compromise
> Nah, not chosen. Dictated by economics.
They could have chosen several different sized sensors in this size/
price class by the economics, incl
Economics are certainly a factor in the choice of that sensor size,
but it was, nevertheless, a choice. And it seems to have become the
industry standard. That will lead to more development and better
quality.
Paul
On Aug 27, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>
I went to print some business cards with CS2 and discovered none of the
Picture Package options would format them correctly. Last time I printed a
batch I was using PS7. Has the Picture Package changed?
Thanks, Bill Lawlor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/
Huh?
On Aug 27, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
>>
>>
> My complaint is about normal lengths, ala 50mm. A 31mm perspective is
> fine, but the 31mm focal length doesn't look "normal" at all to me.
>
> -Ryan
> 1dsm2 and istD user
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:33:07 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm interested in buying a used darkroom. I've come across what seems to
> be a good deal. I'm sure some of you have more knowledge of this sort of
> thing than I do.
>
> for sale:
> Besler 23CII enlarger with Zone VI cold light he
Outstanding. Excellent compositions. Thanks for sharing.
Paul
On Aug 27, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Bob W wrote:
> They do things differently there*.
>
> But apparently the mobile phones are much the same.
>
> I found the time travel option on my digital camera menu today, so I
> thought I'd give it a try:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
> ... You would figure that touting the
> K series' backwards compatibility Pentax would have
> these issues straightened out.
If the issue is variances in individual lens' characteristics, it's
hard to build in surety that *all* examples wor
On Aug 27, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
>> The only complaints about crop factors and telephoto's I've run acros
>> are about 85's. Not many people are happy that their uber-pricey
>> portrait tele's are now too long for general use and the 50's
>> don't have
>> the bokeh of those 85's
On Aug 27, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> I just checked the timestamps in the headers and it seems the list
> server *does* keep them in order (indeed, I received them in order -
> this second post came well after your first one).
>
> It's just propagation of the outgoing messages from
The Port de Renory at the river Meuse and, in the background, the Ougrée
blast furnace plant of Cockerill Sambre (Arcelor). Renory (Liège),
Belgium.
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1611448&ref=section&refid=7
Comments and suggestions as always most welcome.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermac
Bob Shell wrote:
> Habits are hard to break, so after almost getting hit on my first
> trip to England years ago, I started making a habit of looking both
> ways before crossing a street, since my natural habit from the USA is
> to look the wrong way.
I don't know if it's true, but one of m
Godfrey DiGiorgi affirmed:
> No question: for a film SLR, buy the Pentax standard hood. It's the
> most convenient in use.
That's what I'll do as soon as the test film returns.
> I tested the 24-90 briefly and bought the 28-105/3.2-4.5 instead due
> to the difference in price, but after a whi
graywolf wrote:
> Internet paths are a drunkard's walk. One email may go directly from a
> to b, another may go from a to z to h to g to y to k to e to r to b.
> Obviously the first message would arrive sooner than the second. It
> works amazingly well unless some server along the way accepts th
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Huh?
> On Aug 27, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
>
>
The difference of a "50mm crop" of a ~31mm lens versus a 50mm full-frame
shot.
>>>
>> My complaint is about normal lengths, ala 50mm. A 31mm perspective is
>> fine, but the 31mm focal length doesn't look
Folks,
today in the train, I finally got it. The misterious feature of upcoming
K10D will be a sensor with an aspect ration near 4x5, like the 6x7 has.
As Pentax people lately like weird numbers, it'll be something like
27x23mm, which is close to the 69x56mm ration of 6x7. This will make
print
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
>
>
>>> The only complaints about crop factors and telephoto's I've run acros
>>> are about 85's. Not many people are happy that their uber-pricey
>>> portrait tele's are now too long for general use and the 50's
>>> do
Thanks. much appreciated.
> I made some quick and dirty comparisons between my DA16-45/4, A20/2.8
> and A24/2.8 on Friday, the DA isn't as bad as I recalled but it does
> have some strange characteristics that I'm at odds with.
>
> Sharpness wise the DA seems a pretty competent performer however i
I have to admit that my SMC-F 28/2.8 on my D (more or less 42mm)
doesn't like normal at all, it does indeed feels like WA.
Even my FA 50/1.4 look more normal on my D than my 28... weird.
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML
But awfully ugly they are!
I agree Canons or feels plastic as a plastic lighter..
So Oly,Pentax and Nikons have ok (or better) bodies.
2006/8/27, Douglas Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> --- Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, KM/Sony is even worse IMO...
>
> The A100 has disappointi
Thanks Bob,
Looks like an expensive way to use your Leica glass!
...I guess that's nothing new.
Regards, Bob S.
On 8/27/06, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 27, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
> > still "Invalid attachment specified...notify administrator"
> > Regards, Bob
Bob,
At first, I thought you were the lad in the first photo putting on his
cap. Then I thought maybe it was your dad as a boy. When I got to
Winston Churchill (?) entering down stairway into the Admiralty
Offices (?), I got somewhat confused. The last image of the guy
sitting and dialing his c
Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 27/08/06, Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Anybody for taking your Coolscan 9000 apart?
>>
>>http://www.marginalsoftware.com/LS8000Notes/cleaning_the_optics_of_the_ls.htm
>
>
> 8000 perhaps?
>
> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/P3074553.j
On Aug 27, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
> It appears to be a crop of a wide angle lens, which it is.
>
> In particular, informal head and shoulders shots look a bit odd if I'm
> close to the subject. The shoulder may seem enlarged if I'm taking a
> profile, for example. Whereas a 50mm wo
On Aug 27, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Thibouille wrote:
> I have to admit that my SMC-F 28/2.8 on my D (more or less 42mm)
> doesn't like normal at all, it does indeed feels like WA.
> Even my FA 50/1.4 look more normal on my D than my 28... weird.
Again, please post a couple of comparison photographs sh
Read the path lists from a large bunch of emails and get back to me on
that.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Ryan Brooks wrote:
> graywolf wrote:
>> Internet paths are a drunkard
> None of the lenses I've used with the *ist DS have
> had any problems,
> and they have been K, M, A, F, FA, and DA series
> Pentax lenses (as
> well as the Zenitar-K 16/2.8 FE). Haven't gotten
> anything yet that
> was too far out of spec for my two bodies, I guess.
>
> Godfrey
In light
> Could you show me how to do this with my Pentax?
I only have the instructions for the Olympus, but the Pentax isn't
likely to be much different - they're probably based on the same
patent.
"Instruction for the time travelling mode.
Warning: do not use for present travelling across many distant
Beautiful, Ralf. Much more serene than the last one.
Moody, but not gloomy. Very sharp, too, lots of
detail.
Very nice.
-Brendan
--- "Ralf R. Radermacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Port de Renory at the river Meuse and, in the
> background, the Ougrée
> blast furnace plant of Cockerill S
Nice review. Although, deep down in my psyche, I still rankle about the
compatibiltiy of older K-mount lenses, I did get kind of get use to the
"extra step" using my *ist D. I like the anti-shake feature of the K100.
The price seems right, too. Don't know If I will spring for the K100 or
ev
Thanks Paul - I appreciate the compliment.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
> Sent: 27 August 2006 20:57
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The past is another country.
>
> Outstanding. Exc
> looks like Colorado between Colorado Springs and Denver
close! it's near sulphur springs, west and a little north of Denver
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&client=safari&q=sulphur+springs+80451&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF-8&z=9&ll=39.835959,-105.339661&spn=1.100919,1.95282&om=1
are from this are
On 27/8/06, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>OK, I downloaded it and put the damned thing in my PESO folder. Here
>it is:
>
>http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/m8.jpg
Oooh. :-)
needs some sort of robust LCD cover though..
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Pl
On 8/26/06, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looks a lot better, but still a bit dark.
>
> I like the idea and the composition, the repeating horizontal lines of
> the barbed wire fence, rail line, and telephone wires, and the overall
> starkness of the place. It captures a mood very well
> and quite symbolic. The pole as a cross offers a stark image!
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
interesting. I had not thought of that before, thanks for commenting
russell
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
