Hi!
> Based on Wheatfield's comments on problem areas, I have done a little work on
> the
> image.
>
> Here is version 2:
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3580a.htm
>
>
> Here is the original for comparison:
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3580.htm
You sure have patience, Bruce, lots
Boy, there must be something out there lessoning me. I had a recent deal
that I was not too happy about. Not the item, but the way the seller was
acting. In the end it worked out, but I was up in the air about
feedback. Now this here, and a thread on another list made my think it
through, and I
Op Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:35:21 +0200 schreef Thibouille
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sure but suppose you are in holliday in Switzerland and forget to to
> decalre it when going back? Not that you should do this of course ;)
Going to Switserland to save money, a hard concept to grasp! Better make
it
Hi!
> As I was working through the photos for the last wedding I shot, I
> came across this photo - it was a nice slice of life type shot.
>
> Pentax *istD, FA 50/1.4, Handheld
> ISO 800, 1/90 sec @ f/3.5
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/mazzaferri_0047.htm
I honestly think that this is a rar
Hi!
> My wife wanted to feed the pigeons:
>
> http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/535671/display/6997754
Not sure about your wife, but pigeons sure had fun. You did too, it
seems ;-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
At 04:55 AM 25/10/2006, Cotty wrote:
>On 24/10/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >> An add-on aperture simulator?
> >
> >Goddammit CoTty you stupid frigging
> >Idiot. Its called a aperture
> >Cam sensor!
> >
> >:-) <-- right back at ya
> >
> >(spelling, punctuation, gramm
- Original Message -
From: "Perry Pellechia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: USA tour 2004 now online
> On 10/24/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Perry Pellechia wrote:
>>
>> >On 10/24/06, Charles Rob
I think photography is as much about what not to photograph or include in a
photo as it is about what to include.
I probably would not have taken the original image if I had noticed the
distractions.
I pass up a lot of potential images for "imperfections", when I see them.
Kenneth Waller
-
A wonderful capture Jack, but I personally would have left out the tree in
the left hand edge, It doesn't add anything but is distracting.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Moulton Barn
> Another barn. This time, my favorite over
- Original Message -
From: "keith_w"
Subject: Re: PESO - Simple Macro
> I just don't agree that each and every shot one makes must be as free
> from annoyances as is humanly possible. That every shot displayed must
> be PS'd out of it's mind, just to suit viewers!
Back in the bad old
ROFLMAO
Dave
At 10:08 AM 25/10/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>Bully? What the hell are you talking about?
>What have I done or posted to justify that label?
>jco
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>William Robb
>Sent: Tuesday, October 24,
On 10/24/06, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amita - there are some stunning photos here - and I enjoyed
> the more
> casual ones, too - (cute kitty!)
Thanks! Yes, I put in a bunch that don't have much artistic value,
just to give a better idea of what the vacation was like. I'm active
A 35/1.4 is such a perfect focal length/aperture combination. I've wanted
such a lens from Pentax for years.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 10/24/2006 8:08:55 PM
> Subject: Anyone checked this out yet?
>
> More likely a strange aperture, a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Great Peter.
>
> Round fuckin three.
>
Why wring your hands over it? Just use a filter and put the posts you
dont want in the bit bucket. Its amazing how different the list becomes.
> Dave
>
>
>
> Quoting Peter Buysman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>>Please JCO,
More likely a strange aperture, and a bit slower, a f3.2 pancake or some
such.
Alan Chan wrote:
>>Pentax is coming out with a DA 35. Some speculation is that it might
>>be an F1.4.
-
That is actually a good reason why it could be an F1.4, F1.7, or F2.
Pentax needs something to distinguis
I take exception to this. You don't put dogs down for this type of thing...
you work with them and as Cesar Milan says you rehabilitate dogs and train
their owners.
I know you were using this as a figure of speech and probably did not mean
it, but I would prefer not suggest dogs be put down for
Good 'un, Bruce ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bruce Dayton
> As I was working through the photos for the last wedding I shot, I
> came across this photo - it was a nice slice of life type shot.
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/mazzaferri_0047.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
On 10/24/06, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great shots, Amita. So, did you go there to meet all the Greek cats, or
> is that just the way it worked out?
Thanks! I had heard about all the strays there, but I didn't realize
how approachable they would be until I got there. I've never
Bully? What the hell are you talking about?
What have I done or posted to justify that label?
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 7:51 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
In a message dated 10/24/2006 2:15:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So does putting an insect in the fridge to make it sluggish bother
you? Does removing foliage or nearby plants bother you? Does
misting a spider web bother you? The list can go on.
Thoughts anyone?
You are not reading my posts on this matter.
I DID NOT treat him in a abusive matter or
Unfairly. THAT is why I so freaking pissed
When he wrote that total B.S. He has no
Right to do it when its NOT TRUE.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I like this Bruce. A good moment. All the principals are in the right
position and playing their roles. I might try the shadow/highlight
tool on this one to pull down the window highlights and brighten the
foreground a bit.
Paul
On Oct 24, 2006, at 9:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a me
But if you read my posts on the matter
You would know that it isnt true. By
His own admission he didn't even remember
My total refund offer or how the condition
Was listed. I have a right to complain
About him as a buyer. He is totally wrong
On the entire matter and wrong to cast
Dispersions on me
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Hey, Keith ...
>
> I didn't suggest any changes, just pointed out what Wheatfield was
> referencing.
>
> Shel
Oh...I know.
Wheatfield? Bob W. is he?
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 10/24/2006 5:58:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> As I was working through the photos for the last wedding I shot, I
> came across this photo - it was a nice slice of life type shot.
>
> Pentax *istD, FA 50/1.4, Handheld
> ISO 800, 1/90 sec @ f/3.5
>
> htt
In a message dated 10/24/2006 5:06:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cotty wrote:
>
> On 24/10/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Perhaps Marnie had had a glass of wine when she took the shot. In which
>> case it ought to look straight to you...
> LOL. Yeah,
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "keith_w"
> Subject: Re: PESO - Simple Macro
>
>
>> Another way of saying it is, if "all" you want to do is make magazine
>> cover images, carry on!
>> If your intent is to portray the image as you SAW it, ignore them.
> If the intent
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bruce Dayton"
> Subject: PESO - Simple Macro Revised
>
>
>> Based on Wheatfield's comments on problem areas, I have done a little
>> work on the
>> image.
>>
>> Here is version 2:
>> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3580a.htm
> My
On 10/24/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> >On 10/24/06, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Cotty wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>You think yor some kind of SMART ASS
> >>>You fucking dumb shit. What the hell kind
> >>>Of game are you playing? I've con
That should be the opposite of what I wrote.
P. J. Alling wrote:
>Only if you tilt in opposite directions, otherwise the tilts will reinforce.
>
>Cotty wrote:
>
>
>
>>On 24/10/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Perhaps Marnie had had a glass of wine when she to
Scott Loveless wrote:
>On 10/24/06, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Cotty wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>You think yor some kind of SMART ASS
>>>You fucking dumb shit. What the hell kind
>>>Of game are you playing? I've constantly
>>>Said the same thing ver and ver again and
>>>You just don't
Quoting Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have no use for my CF cards >
Noo
D
> Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
> --
> *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdm
Second version better Bruce. Although,:-), the half long bit of web
seems out of place.
Super shot, non the less.
Dave
Quoting Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Based on Wheatfield's comments on problem areas, I have done a
> little work on the
> image.
>
> Here is version 2:
> http://ww
I used to thing these guys harped on things.
Sheeeshh
Dave
Equine Photography in York Region
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shel was satisfied enough to keep the lens and not reverse the transaction.
. .
The point was not really whether Shel was satisfied or not, it was that he
left out the part about reaching a settlement they both must have thought
was equitable, which casts a much darker shadow over the whole aff
Any chance you might deal north of the border, Mark
Dave
Quoting Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sending this email out now while I have a free moment. I have a
> Colorvision Spyder monitor profiling kit for sale. Like new. With
> software. $75.00 including shipping in the US.
>
>
> --
> PDM
Quoting Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Oct 24, 2006, at 7:48 PM, Tom C wrote:
>
>> FWIW
>>
>> http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/troll.htm
>>
>>
>> Tom C
>
> yeah, uh, Tom, your security check threw up some red flags.
Yup, no hat there Doug.
Dave
>
> Doug Brewer
> http://www.drivingtheflie
Alien Robot you mean.
Bob Shell wrote:
>I was leaving the Southern Inn restaurant in Lexington, VA, recently
>when this pug ugly SOB nearly got me with one of his writhing
>tentacles. Luckily I escaped, but managed to snap this photo as I
>fled to my car.
>
>http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/al
In a message dated 10/24/2006 5:41:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JCO will stop if no one addresses him. That is the only way the list
can "win." I thought that most of the list members had agreed to put
a halt to this a few days ago? He'll continue as long as he is
a
Never kept me from getting a job... :-)
Tom C.
Original Message Follows
From: Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT - Beware the Troll
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:03:49 -0400
On Oct 24, 2006, at 7:48 PM, Tom C
Only if you tilt in opposite directions, otherwise the tilts will reinforce.
Cotty wrote:
>On 24/10/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>Perhaps Marnie had had a glass of wine when she took the shot. In which
>>case it ought to look straight to you...
>>
>>
>
>LOL. Yeah, I
On Oct 24, 2006, at 7:48 PM, Tom C wrote:
> FWIW
>
> http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/troll.htm
>
>
> Tom C
yeah, uh, Tom, your security check threw up some red flags.
Doug Brewer
http://www.drivingtheflies.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/
More likely a strange aperture, and a bit slower, a f3.2 pancake or some
such.
Alan Chan wrote:
>>Pentax is coming out with a DA 35. Some speculation is that it might
>>be an F1.4.
>>
>>
>
>Seem to make sense. Make it regular DA to keep the cost down, then we will
>have a fast standard prime
Very nice, once again proving that you can make very good photos with
"obsolete" lenses.
Jens Bladt wrote:
>Take a looke at this, please:
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/278532339/
>Regards
>
>Jens Bladt
>http://www.jensbladt.dk
>
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible --
Should'nt this be labelled OT Bruce. This is actually dealing with
photography.
Dave
BTW love the shot
Dave
Quoting Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As I was working through the photos for the last wedding I shot, I
> came across this photo - it was a nice slice of life type shot.
>
> Pe
Mark Roberts wrote:
>Perry Pellechia wrote:
>
>
>
>>On 10/24/06, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Oct 24, 2006, at 11:51, John Francis wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
o It's horse-shoe, not horse-shoe (falls at Niagara)
>>>OK, I've read that sentence 5
Quoting cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I decided that I'd
> like to have some quick prints of the baby but since I shot in RAW format I
> needed to go home and fiddle with them first... No prints today since I
> didn't have time to fiddle before dinner. The K10D's in-camera RAW
> conversion to J
As I was working through the photos for the last wedding I shot, I
came across this photo - it was a nice slice of life type shot.
Pentax *istD, FA 50/1.4, Handheld
ISO 800, 1/90 sec @ f/3.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/mazzaferri_0047.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I prefer this revised version. Good one.
Paul
On Oct 24, 2006, at 7:55 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bruce Dayton"
> Subject: PESO - Simple Macro Revised
>
>
>> Based on Wheatfield's comments on problem areas, I have done a little
>> work on the
>> image.
>>
>>
Great Peter.
Round fuckin three.
Dave
Quoting Peter Buysman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please JCO, stop joining this list. Go and play with some toys. I'm
> really disgusted by the way you polute this list!
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
JCO will stop if no one addresses him. That is the only way the list
can "win." I thought that most of the list members had agreed to put
a halt to this a few days ago? He'll continue as long as he is
addressed. You're not teaching him anything, You're just fueling the
fire.
Paul
On Oct 24,
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
> The part Shel left out was, that in the end, the transaction was
> handled to
> their mutual satisfaction.
Define "mutual satisfaction".
If I buy something that is defective out of
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
> Personally, I don't think things shared in private email should be
> shared on
> list. It's a basic no-no in Net Etiquette. And I know Shel one time
> shared
> something we
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: PESO - Simple Macro Revised
> Based on Wheatfield's comments on problem areas, I have done a little
> work on the
> image.
>
> Here is version 2:
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3580a.htm
My initial reaction is GAGHHH, no
I was packing a kit to go take pictures of my day-old nephew this morning
and found something out. My Lowepro EX140 (quite a small bag) is useless
for the *istD with the grip attached. I've used it for a couple years for
the camera and a couple lenses or one lens and a flash. Hmmm... need
so
- Original Message -
From: "keith_w"
Subject: Re: PESO - Simple Macro
> Another way of saying it is, if "all" you want to do is make magazine
> cover images, carry on!
> If your intent is to portray the image as you SAW it, ignore them.
If the intent is to make pretty pictures, then w
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele"
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>
> come on guys - take it off list or lighten up or both
>
> annsan for peace and friendliness
The guy that built my house is a jco type. He also uses bullying and
abuse to get what he wants.
The problem with let
The feeling is mutual with regards
To what others are posting about me.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Peter Buysman
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 8:16 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: JCO
Please JCO, stop joining this list. Go and pl
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> My experience with JCO was not a pleasant one, and, because of that, I will
> not do business with him again. As an eBay buyer - especially one dealing
> with a fellow list member - I don't want confrontational and accusatory
> emails. Sh!t happens, and there's no reason n
Please JCO, stop joining this list. Go and play with some toys. I'm
really disgusted by the way you polute this list!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
cbwaters wrote:
> But Doug, the Lola is all wobbly looking...didn't you have your
> graduated anti-heat-shimmer filter fitted?
I'm looking for a PS plugin ... none of that old-fangled flat glass in
front of my curved glass thing for me. ;-)
> Or perhaps the Lola was already starting to burn...(
John Francis wrote:
> I've found the AF can actually keep up with cars approaching
> head-on at three figure speeds.
Sure. Very low angular velocity of the subject. I don't have any
problems with it in those situations. Where it fouls up for me is the
"lag time" issue of the area that's in foc
Bob Shell wrote:
> I was leaving the Southern Inn restaurant in Lexington, VA, recently
> when this pug ugly SOB nearly got me with one of his writhing
> tentacles. Luckily I escaped, but managed to snap this photo as I
> fled to my car.
>
> http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/alien.jpg
>
> Bob
Congrats, James. I had one for a week, once. Decided I didn't "need" it.
It's Sooo nice. It's high quality craftsmanship, I'd say. Beautiful piece of
toy, sorry tool.
I'd rather have a 645 because of the possible re-use of my Zeiss/Schneider
lenses for my Pentacons. I'm biddig for one at ebay occat
Cotty wrote:
>
> On 24/10/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Perhaps Marnie had had a glass of wine when she took the shot. In which
>> case it ought to look straight to you...
> LOL. Yeah, I'll buy that.
More like 1/2 a glass, eh Marnie? ;-)
keith whaley
--
PDML Pentax-Di
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Trying to view an image that is several times as large as the computer
> screen is simply annoying.
That's why I provided several sizes. :-)
> The two that I could view reasonably were
> quite good however.
Thanks!
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
Jan van Wijk wrote:
>>> I have a Lowepro 'CompuTrekker' for that purpose.
>> Do you think it's big enough for a body plus 16-45/4, 50-200/4-5.6(?),
> No problem at all, I just tested it to be sure :-)
Awesome! Many thanks for testing it out for me. I guess I'll have to
see if I can find one l
Your entire post is horseshit because I NEVER
Sell anything described as PERFECT. I sold
It as excellent condtion, not perfect and not
Like new. I sometimes sell things as like new
When they appear just like new but I DID NOT
List that lens as perfect or even like new.
Secondly, thanks for remindi
FWIW
http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/troll.htm
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks, folks :-)
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Godfrey
DiGiorgi
Sendt: 24. oktober 2006 00:21
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: PDML Archive
Jack Davis wrote:
> Another barn. This time, my favorite overall barn scene.
Very nice shot. I particularly like the way you've got the apex of the
tallest peak sort of outlining, and reinforcing the angles of, the apex
of the barn roof.
It's a little warm for my tastes, even though I'm aware
frank theriault wrote:
> Go ahead, taunt me. I don't mind...
Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
> On 24/10/06, Amita Guha, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> http://sunny16.smugmug.com/gallery/2040336/
>
> Lovely stuff, well done Amita.
Great shots, Amita. So, did you go there to meet all the Greek cats, or
is that just the way it worked out?
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PD
Dave Kennedy wrote:
> do you use hoods on *all* your lenses?
I do on all of the lenses that get any regular use. I've got some
lenses in the drawer that don't get used often and that I also don't
have hoods for. Even when they get used, though, it's usually not in
the "quick change" scenario.
What the hell makes you think that this
Ebay deal years ago was even remotely
Similar to the vulgar trading of posts this
Last week on the list regarding
The aperture cam sensor. It wasn't
Of course.
I suggest you shut the hell up
Because for you to defend someone
Who did what he did after volunta
Adam Maas wrote:
> This actually came up in a thread on a forum I read often (About what to
> do the next time some idjit E-6 requisitions a 'vehicle' instead of a
> truck, the suggestion was to issue a pink girl's bike).
With pink handlebar tassels, and, of course, a pink "banana" seat.
Might
Gave me a good chuckle!
--
Bruce
Tuesday, October 24, 2006, 3:33:02 PM, you wrote:
BS> I was leaving the Southern Inn restaurant in Lexington, VA, recently
BS> when this pug ugly SOB nearly got me with one of his writhing
BS> tentacles. Luckily I escaped, but managed to snap this photo as I
Truly appreciated words, Paul.
Was in place and set up while still dark and was the second
photographer there.
Shot with two cameras. One with pos. film and the other, neg..
Property is protected from folks driving onto it, but the fence is
easily climbed or it's only a short hike to an opening do
We disagreed on the condition of the item. It was
Not a case of obvious misrepresation or oversight. If it was
Something major he would not have kept it would he?
Secondly, if I offered him a full money back including shipping if
Not satified even though I disagreed with him
On the conditon, I was
Of course you can sort and file your images at your leisure outside
of Lightroom. Who said you can't? Tell Lightroom to import the items
without moving them from where you have them, all it does then is
build the indexes and thumbnails, with file system references for the
photos. Then you c
Well, I was gonna let this drop. I probably shouldn't have mentioned the
eBay transaction with JCO, but his incessantly rude and abusive posts here
just got me to the point where I felt that, if I showed him that his method
of communication here is similar to what I experienced in doing business
w
Wow! Gorgeous. Looks like a painting. Love this one.
Paul
On Oct 24, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Another barn. This time, my favorite overall barn scene.
> I don't suppose this scene needs to be identified to many of you.
> This,
> and another barn close by are both owned by the Moulto
Interesting, Amazon in Germany has higher prices, and Amazon in the UK doesn't
have the K10D. The Dutch Amazon refers to the one in the UK so no luck there
either.
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 16:24, Thibouille wrote:
> An official information published on Clubic (www.clubic.com) yesterday:
>
> K1
I was leaving the Southern Inn restaurant in Lexington, VA, recently
when this pug ugly SOB nearly got me with one of his writhing
tentacles. Luckily I escaped, but managed to snap this photo as I
fled to my car.
http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/alien.jpg
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hey, Keith ...
I didn't suggest any changes, just pointed out what Wheatfield was
referencing.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: keith_w
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > Behind the three heads in the foreground, behind the center stalk and
the
> > "V" created by the left and center stalks.
> >
>
He wanted a lens (or whatever it was). Not hassle, rudeness, and a refund.
Or can't you see that?
John
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:43:40 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Just ask him if I offered him a a full refund
> Including two way shipping costs? I did. And that
> Pretty m
When one gets involved in a transaction, one doesn't want to end up with a
rude seller, or a partial refund. One wants a polite person and a good
item.
The fact that you offered a refund was acknowledgement that the
transaction was not satisfactory, and having to accept a refund when what
Generous comments, Bruce. I felt especially lucky to have had the
Tetons lit up. Lighting is everything.
Thanks!
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seen it before, but it is still beautiful. This is a true classic
> shot and you have got some great light on that barn. Very nice
On 10/24/06, Jan van Wijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank for the compliment, Godders!
I missed the initial post, but I agree with everyone else. Lovely
gallery, and some great souvenirs of what looked like a memorable
trip, Jan.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Hen
[...]
> I know that angle of view and lens/body/film (for us luddites )
> are all editorial choices made by the photographer that alter the
> photo from conception. One wonders why it makes a difference
whether
> such alterations are done post processing or before the shot's made
> (you could hav
Just ask him if I offered him a a full refund
Including two way shipping costs? I did. And that
Pretty much will end the story and define who
Is the guilty party.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 20
On 10/24/06, Amita Guha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would probably help if I included a URL. :)
>
> http://sunny16.smugmug.com/gallery/2040336/
>
> Amita
So.
They actually eat Souvlaki in Greece, eh? ;-)
Great shots, Amita. Looks like you had a terrific time!!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpnes
Fuck you forbes. I already posted I offered
Him a TOTAL refund including shipping both
Ways. If he didn't accept that then he
Most have been satisfied with the partial
Refund he chose instead. Hes not posting
He wasn't satified due to reality, hes posting
That shit to try to screw up my selling rep
On 10/24/06, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an interesting discussion. Since the first post, I have
> 'fixed' the image to not show the reality that was there. I suppose
> it would be helpful to know the circumstances a bit.
>
> This was shot on San Bruno mountain in a state pa
I have been developing files in RSP, and then sorted them afterwards.
For me it is logical to sort them before converting. This saves me the work
of converting files that don't have keepers potential. With RSP plus
Elements I havent been able to make a streamed workflow suiting my needs.
That'
How can he be unsatified with a total and
Complete reversal of the sale via full refund
Including all shippig coats? Are you stupid
Or what? That's not brow beating, that's a
Refund and that's one of the options I gave
Him. You cant get better customer service
That that. He is just a lowlife scumb
Seen it before, but it is still beautiful. This is a true classic
shot and you have got some great light on that barn. Very nicely
done.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, October 24, 2006, 1:46:19 PM, you wrote:
JD> Another barn. This time, my favorite overall barn scene.
JD> I don't suppose this scene nee
On 10/24/06, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cotty wrote:
>
> >
> > You think yor some kind of SMART ASS
> > You fucking dumb shit. What the hell kind
> > Of game are you playing? I've constantly
> > Said the same thing ver and ver again and
> > You just don't get it. You and that william bl
Another barn. This time, my favorite overall barn scene.
I don't suppose this scene needs to be identified to many of you. This,
and another barn close by are both owned by the Moulton family. Both
are maintained in an arrested state of decay, (I think is the term)
primarily for photographers. Saw
In a message dated 10/24/2006 2:05:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You think yor some kind of SMART ASS
> You fucking dumb shit. What the hell kind
> Of game are you playing? I've constantly
> Said the same thing ver and ver again and
> You just don't get it. You and that
1 - 100 of 275 matches
Mail list logo
