At 02:37 PM 16/10/2007, you wrote:
>On 15/10/2007, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 15/10/07, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
> > >"Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection."
> > > -Jean Luc Godard
> >
> > "Make it so."
> > - Jean Luc Picard
>
At 02:41 PM 16/10/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>On Oct 15, 2007, at 11:04 PM, William Robb wrote:
> > I don't necessarily want a full frame camera, but I would like
> > something
> > that can keep up with my dogs.
>
>So buy a Canon. They're good for that sort of thing.
I was waiting for that
>
On Oct 15, 2007, at 11:04 PM, William Robb wrote:
> Do try to appreciate that some people actually want a high spec
> camera body,
> whether or not they will use it to the maximum of it's abilities.
> Not all of us shoot dead objects sitting on sidewalks.
> I have two dogs that can easily outru
Interesting question.
Is it a real "analog" pen or a digital one?
I use a simple, cheap Wacom pen. I have made a PSD file with a signature
mask, to drag and drop into any image:
http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/482801832/in/set-72157600172610993/
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+
On 15/10/2007, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/10/07, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >"Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection."
> > -Jean Luc Godard
>
> "Make it so."
> - Jean Luc Picard
> Cheers,
> Cotty
"Indeed!"
-Teal'c
--
PDML Pen
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
> On Oct 15, 2007, at 10:02 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
>>> For a second rate company, they do pretty well.
>>
>> Try shooting with a mid range or higher Canon somtime.
Ken,
I like it but I just can't abide chopping off that little bit of peninsula
on the left there. A little more to the right or left would be ok, but it
looks like there's not much land left and you nipped it off.
But eh, I'm just a troll from below the bridge... what do I know?
CW
- Or
On Oct 15, 2007, at 10:02 PM, William Robb wrote:
>> For a second rate company, they do pretty well.
>
> Try shooting with a mid range or higher Canon somtime.
Owned them, did that.
> Have a look at the D40.
Not interested. thanks though. I'd buy a Nikon or an Olympus first.
Canon lenses don'
In a message dated 10/15/2007 7:16:48 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
really like the textures and colors in both of
these. What is missing for me, though, is scale.
They could be taken from 2 feet or 2000 feet away.
Maybe a shell or bit of seaweed or something to give
You are a glutton for punishment...
Adam Maas wrote:
> I use vi
>
> -Adam
> Always the odd one out.
>
>
> Tom C wrote:
>
>> It'll likely be a matter of attrition. What % of people here use
>> WordPerfect as opposed to MS Word?
>>
>> I'll bet it's a 5/95 ratio if not higher. Not too different
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
> For a second rate company, they do pretty well.
Try shooting with a mid range or higher Canon somtime.
Have a look at the D40.
In 1972, Pentax was still more or le
Which certainly explains a lot of STTNG plots.
Bob Blakely wrote:
> "Will, sometimes there is nothing we can do but bow to the absurd."
> - Picard, again...
>
> Regards,
> Bob...
>
> "Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality o
The Plantation Foundation is suing the photographer for making and
selling Fine Art prints as a commercial use in the court dedicated to
copyright claims as a copyright infringement.. The law is being
stretched beyond all recognition. The photographer is selling them for
prices ranging from $25
Dunno, but it's small. I just started shooting LF film to boot.
-Adam
Tom C wrote:
> What % are you? :-)
>
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>> From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the kno
By statute the various ones around here can charge up to $1.00, which
means that the price is $1.00 per copy.
John Sessoms wrote:
> From: "P. J. Alling"
>
>
>> Go to your local land records office, it's self serve, and they still
>> charge you over and above the actual cost for copies...
>>
>> My analogy was not about price, it was about image, prestige,
>> perception in
>> the market place. Sure a FF DSLR will cost more than one with an
>> APS-C size
>> sensor. If the Canons, Nikon's, Sony's of the world offer FF
>> DSLR's, then
>> Pentax must also. If they do not, they will
What % are you? :-)
Tom C.
>From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
>Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:32:32 -0400
>
>I use vi
>
>-Adam
>Always the odd one out.
>
>
> > My analogy was not about price, it was about image, prestige, perception
> > in
> > the market place. Sure a FF DSLR will cost more than one with an APS-C
> > size
> > sensor. If the Canons, Nikon's, Sony's of the world offer FF DSLR's,
>then
> > Pentax must also. If they do not, they wil
I use vi
-Adam
Always the odd one out.
Tom C wrote:
> It'll likely be a matter of attrition. What % of people here use
> WordPerfect as opposed to MS Word?
>
> I'll bet it's a 5/95 ratio if not higher. Not too different from where
> Pentax stands in the market, despite some recent relative
It'll likely be a matter of attrition. What % of people here use
WordPerfect as opposed to MS Word?
I'll bet it's a 5/95 ratio if not higher. Not too different from where
Pentax stands in the market, despite some recent relative success with the
K10D.
Your suppositions are probably correct.
Hadn't looked at this one, Paul, but I have to agree with David.
There's no sense of connection or intimacy to me. It's just a picture
of some women, nicely exposed and composed but otherwise of no
particular emotional merit.
Godfrey
>> I'm not sure what you mean, but I appreciate the comme
On Oct 15, 2007, at 6:54 PM, John Celio wrote:
> How do you decide what to cut and what to keep when you've shot
> more than
> one good photo of a subject? ...
Sometimes with great ease.
Other times with great difficulty.
A typical submission for exhibition requires I pick three to five
pho
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
> My analogy was not about price, it was about image, prestige, perception
> in
> the market place. Sure a FF DSLR will cost more than one with an APS-C
> size
> sensor. If
- Original Message -
From: "John Celio"
Subject: Cut or Keep? A Question About Editing
> How do you decide what to cut and what to keep when you've shot more than
> one good photo of a subject?
I haven't had that happen yet.
>
> Assuming you feel like all or most of the photos of
Why? Pentax has never been a player in the Pro 35mm market. Not being
one now will make little difference.
I expect to see them bring out a body above the K10D within the next 6
months, or a K10D 'successor' that is little more than the new Sony 12MP
sensor and a new shutter in the K10D body, p
LOL. You're not breaking it to me. I was being kind. :-)
Pentax has a slim chance yet to recover. If they blow it in the next 6 - 12
months though, I susect they are done for.
Tom C.
>From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: "pdml"
>Subject: Next
In a message dated 10/15/2007 7:05:14 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do you decide what to cut and what to keep when you've shot more than
one good photo of a subject?
Assuming you feel like all or most of the photos of said subject are good,
how do you distance y
I managed to put a chain saw though my phone line on Saturday so I'm only now
catching up with the list (yes, I knew the phone line was there.)
Sorry to hear about the fall, Dave. Hope recovery will be quicker than
anticipated. On the bright side, it did happen *after* your visit to Sydney
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 06:54:15PM -0700, John Celio wrote:
> How do you decide what to cut and what to keep when you've shot more than
> one good photo of a subject?
>
> Assuming you feel like all or most of the photos of said subject are good,
> how do you distance yourself from your personal
> How do you decide what to cut and what to keep when you've shot more than
> one good photo of a subject?
I usually get super nit picky & force myself to pick only one. I usually can
find things about one image that help it to rise above others.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
-
"Will, sometimes there is nothing we can do but bow to the absurd."
- Picard, again...
Regards,
Bob...
"Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection."
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: "Da
hmmm most interesting. Thanks for the info. I have been finding
that I seem to get a really dominant red for some concert shots.
dk
On 10/15/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So if the red channel only is blowing out detail, what do you do?
> > Underexpose?
> I back down the
I really like the textures and colors in both of
these. What is missing for me, though, is scale.
They could be taken from 2 feet or 2000 feet away.
Maybe a shell or bit of seaweed or something to give
us a hint?
Rick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Another one from Pebble Beach in Half
Touchy, Touchy. No need to get your panties in a bunch Paul.
My personal opinion of street photography is that it rarely works at a
distance & without a sense of interaction. The stuff I really enjoy looking
at makes you feel like you're there. This one doesn't. Technically it's a
fine shot, bu
How do you decide what to cut and what to keep when you've shot more than
one good photo of a subject?
Assuming you feel like all or most of the photos of said subject are good,
how do you distance yourself from your personal attachment to your work or
subject, in order to objectively edit it a
'bout time you learned to spell your last name, too. <>
Jack
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Crayolas have worked for me for the longest.
>
> Tom C.
>
> > >
> > > Branding iron.
> > >
> > > K'plah!!
> >
> >That i have
> >
> >Dave
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Cotty
>
> John, there's lots of my posts that get no responses. Your gallery was
> very nice. I didn't comment since I didn't see anything that I could
> offer a constructive criticism about, exposure seemed to be good, most
> were sharp and good looking, and considering the limitations of your
> equipment
> That's a lot of photos to look at and comment on, john.
> I just ran it as a slideshow ... many good photos in there.
Thanks!
> Edit, edit, edit! Show *only* the best! No more than eight at a time
> if you want comments is my experience.
I have such a hard time deciding which photos to cut and
> FWIW -
> I started to look @ them last night & just decided there were too many -
> I'm
> on dial up.
> A few of your best would have gotten me to look @ them.
There were an awful lot for dialup, sorry about that. I've been on
broadband for a decade now, and keep forgetting there are still pl
> Didn't have time to look (or do much else) over the weekend. Good
> composition and presentation. if you are photographing prop driven planes
> and helis, you need to use a slower shutter speed to stop them looking
> like scale models held in the air by an invisible string. About 1/125th
>
Nice composition. I wonder how it might look with a bit of warming.
Paul
On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> Check out
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Taken in Seney NWR, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, last August.
>
> Comments appreciated
>
That's the photographic equivealent of PC nonsense. I'm less than a
dozen feet away from the subjects. If you use a wide lens and the
subject doesn't see you, it's not a sniper shot? Albano has
frequently mentioned how he likes the fact that the DA 16-45 looks
like a telephoto at its widest
Good one. A perfect juxtaposition.
Paul
On Oct 15, 2007, at 6:41 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> A few weeks ago we had our annual Parkway Run/Walk to
> benefit our cancer research program at The Children's
> Hospital of Philadelphia. About 5000 people turned
> out. I took lots of photos, including this
I hate to break it to you, but in the USA, Pentax *is* a "2nd tier camera
company". The company hasn't released a truly professional system camera
here (or anywhere, actually) since the LX. The current high-end Pentax lens
selection is miniscule compared to Canon and Nikon. Pentax does not pr
I did not say anything about fine art prints. Commercial use is not fine art
use. However selling hundreds of copies printed on your trusty Epson probably
is
commercial use; and I am pretty dam sure selling thousands of litho prints is
no
matter how artsy the image is. You keep putting specifi
"Tea. Earl grey. Hot"
- Ditto same guy
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/16/07, Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Engage."
> - Same guy.
>
> Regards,
> Bob...
>
> "Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection."
>
From: "P. J. Alling"
> Go to your local land records office, it's self serve, and they still
> charge you over and above the actual cost for copies...
Actually, ours doesn't over-charge by much - it's $0.10 per page. Not
out of line with what Kinkos or OfficeMaxDepotStaples would charge.
--
P
On 10/16/07, Igor Roshchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> While you are right about the interference reason, the second
> statement, I believe, is not accurate.
Always a possibility :-)
> I am not sure how long ago you have flown, but the trend I see is that
> those phone are removed f
It's a long range sniper shot. Personally I don't find that kind
"street" photography appealing.
When I compare it to the work by those who get in close with a wide
lens, it lacks the intimacy of that style.
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure w
>- Original Message -
>From: "John Sessoms"
>Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
>
> > If memory serves the other two are an over-priced Nissan and an
> > over-priced Honda.
> >
>
>I guess that depends on what your personal comfort is worth.
>
>William
- Original Message -
From: "John Sessoms"
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
> If memory serves the other two are an over-priced Nissan and an
> over-priced Honda.
>
I guess that depends on what your personal comfort is worth.
William Robb
-
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in Seney NWR, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, last August.
Comments appreciated
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.n
Go to your local land records office, it's self serve, and they still
charge you over and above the actual cost for copies...
John Sessoms wrote:
> From: "P. J. Alling"
>
>
>> I also don't believe that you should be required to pay for copies.
>> Well that's not true, if the fees were actually
From: "P. J. Alling"
> I also don't believe that you should be required to pay for copies.
> Well that's not true, if the fees were actually paying what the
> copies were worth, that would be fine. Especially since actual costs
> of running the office are already paid for by tax dollars. You can
>
John Sessoms wrote:
> From: mike wilson
>
>> Tom C wrote:
>>
>>> Overall I agree with what Peter is saying (and have always felt
>>> this way since the introduction of the *ist D)... that is, when FF
>>> sensors become economical enough to be mainstream, Pentax must make
>>> a FF body or be regard
John Sessoms wrote:
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> The last time I flew (several years ago but post-9/11), I think
>> they asked us to turn off all personal electronics for takeoff
>> and landing but said we could turn them back on when the "fasten
>> seat belts" sign went out. I thought it was
"Engage."
- Same guy.
Regards,
Bob...
"Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection."
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list"
Sent: Monday, October
From: mike wilson
> Tom C wrote:
>
>> Overall I agree with what Peter is saying (and have always felt
>> this way since the introduction of the *ist D)... that is, when FF
>> sensors become economical enough to be mainstream, Pentax must make
>> a FF body or be regarded as a 2nd rate toy camera m
Nope. If you're on public property, you have the right to take the
photo, period (outside of France & Quebec of course). The subject being
on private property is irrelevant.
As to commercial use, that's what I'm talking about. Private Property
law is far less restrictive than you believe.
-Ada
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The last time I flew (several years ago but post-9/11), I think
> they asked us to turn off all personal electronics for takeoff
> and landing but said we could turn them back on when the "fasten
> seat belts" sign went out. I thought it was silly but didn't
> mind tur
From: "David Savage"
> I don't know if it's a valid reason on modern aircraft, but it's
> better to be safe than sorry IMO.
It is, but current airline policies don't provide the former, only the
later.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.ne
A few weeks ago we had our annual Parkway Run/Walk to
benefit our cancer research program at The Children's
Hospital of Philadelphia. About 5000 people turned
out. I took lots of photos, including this quick
grab, which summarizes what all of us want for our
kids:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?
You should read the NY Times article I posted, selling Art prints is not
a commercial purpose under US law. Nor is it a violation of copyright.
The case is being tried under the wrong law in the wrong court for a
crime that hasn't been committed.
graywolf wrote:
> You guys are still confusing
On 15/10/07, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>"Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection."
> -Jean Luc Godard
"Make it so."
- Jean Luc Picard
;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottys
Yes, india ink with a quill pen is the only proper thing.
David Savage wrote:
> On 10/15/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If not matted, fine tip Sharpie.
>
> Not the most archival stable choice.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
Well, for fine art prints a repro signature would not make it as valuable with
one with an actual hand written signature. Signatures of fameous people have a
pretty good collectors value in their own right. Hummm I will be glad to
sell anyone on the list a personalized autograph for $100, no
Insidious, isn't it?
Regards,
Bob...
"Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection."
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I too was getting excellent resul
You guys are still confusing the right to take the photo, and the right to use
the photo commercially. They are entirely different issues, as I have said
before.
John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Adam Maas
>
>> This is a very grey area. If your Blazer is parked in a public area
>> when the picture wa
On 10/13/07, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The X-ray sheet was too big for my scanner as it obscured the
> calibration area. I wasn't willing to cut it up, so I put it on my
> light box and set up the K10D on a tripod.
>
> Enjoy :)
>
> http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/xray.html
What?
On 10/13/07, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This time around I've done it properly. Fell hard while riding home
> from the trails and broke my left collarbone. I tried riding/walking
> it off while muttering a mixture of encouragement and obscenity to
> myself (didn't know it was actuall
Crayolas have worked for me for the longest.
Tom C.
> >
> > Branding iron.
> >
> > K'plah!!
>
>That i have
>
>Dave
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Cotty
> >
> >
> > ___/\__
> > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
> > ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
> > ___
Normally, I wouldn't have seen this, Allings been on my killfile for
quite some time, along with joc.. My disparaging comment was simply
because I understood exactly what Adam was saying, and Alling seemed
to be practicing deliberate stupidity on the subject.
Peter, don't cry because I am mean if y
On 10/15/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/10/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >For those that do sign their work, what pen(s) do you use.
>
> Branding iron.
>
> K'plah!!
That i have
Dave
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__
> || (O) | People, Places,
Then I my work is done.
Cotty wrote:
> On 15/10/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> You and JCO should get a Condo together.
>>
>
> I have lots of visions and double-entendres dancing in my head now, non
> of them pleasant.
>
>
--
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
Daft! :-)
Tom C.
>From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On 15/10/07, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Frankly, Sony and Canon (Manufacturers of the Sensors
> >being discussed)
>
>Frankly sensors aren't very sharp - they suffer from a sort of built-in
>motion blur
>
>--
>
>
>Cheers,
>
On 15/10/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>For those that do sign their work, what pen(s) do you use.
Branding iron.
K'plah!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 15/10/07, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Frankly, Sony and Canon (Manufacturers of the Sensors
>being discussed)
Frankly sensors aren't very sharp - they suffer from a sort of built-in
motion blur
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=
On 15/10/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>You and JCO should get a Condo together.
I have lots of visions and double-entendres dancing in my head now, non
of them pleasant.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.c
Humm. Never thought to look at just the one channel.
I'll go back and see what some of them look like.
Dave
On 10/15/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So if the red channel only is blowing out detail, what do you do?
> > Underexpose?
> I back down the overall exposure until the r
I understand. I've often wished for a wider lens, I just haven't been
willing to pay for one.
Tom C.
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
>Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007
I was first motivated to buy DA lenses for the same reason. I had to have wide
glass to shoot room and car interiors. The DA 16-45 was a partial solution, and
it turned out to be an excellent all-around lens as well. The DA 12-24 has
proven to be an even better lens and an optimum solution for i
I too was getting excellent results from my non-digital-optimized
lenses. Only problem was, non of them were wide enough. I looked all
over the place, but couldn't find a rectilinear lens wider than 15mm
in the Pentax stable.
Of course, once I bought one DA lens, it was easier to buy a second
one,
Sure. We all buy what we buy based on our own needs, wants, finances,
permission from the wife, etc.
Pentax has to consider it's entire market. Maybe they have enough R&D
money from Hoya to flirt with a $2K FF DSLR. I'd be glad to see it just
for what it would represent. I also know that the
> So if the red channel only is blowing out detail, what do you do?
> Underexpose?
I back down the overall exposure until the red channel is within bounds.
>Don't you then loose all non-red detail? No they become somewhat under
>exposed.
In my cardinal images, It didn't take much correction to pr
Well, that's you, and you were talking about you and that's good. I was
talking about me. No one should assume that I'm implying that others should
want what I want. FYI, I also own a 645NII with a 645 for backup as well as
a 67II with a 67 for backup. I find the 35mm size to be just perfect for
Seems the better method.
Thanks'
Dave
On 10/15/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave - I use a Sharpie Permanent Marker, ultra fine point, black.
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subjec
I don't feel cheated, but... well maybe. Recall that we were expecting a FF
DSLR camera from Pentax, first one out the door. OK, that's water under the
bridge, but the technology existed then (albeit likely implemented
incorrectly) for a FF DSLR. Four - five years later things have changed.
Thanks Rebekah.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Great! I love the color in this one and the expressions are great :)
>
> rg2
>
> On 10/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you mean, but I apprec
Great! I love the color in this one and the expressions are great :)
rg2
On 10/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean, but I appreciate the comments. Thanks for looking.
> Paul
> -- Original message --
> From: "David Savag
> For some reason, when i photograph red flowers, all i get is glob of
> red and no detail.
Check the red channel of the histogram on the camera.
I learned earlier this year, after shooting some cardinals, that even tho
the overall histogram was within bounds, when I looked @ the red channel, I
So if the red channel only is blowing out detail, what do you do?
Underexpose? Don't you then loose all non-red detail? (never really
used the RGB channel histograms before).
dk
On 10/15/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check the red channel of the histogram on the camera.
> I lea
Dave - I use a Sharpie Permanent Marker, ultra fine point, black.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Signing Photo's
> For those that do sign their work, what pen(s) do you use.
>
> I notice a lot of my fe
FWIW -
I started to look @ them last night & just decided there were too many - I'm
on dial up.
A few of your best would have gotten me to look @ them.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "John Celio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GESO: SF Fleet Week
On Oct 15, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Steve Desjardins wrote:
> BTW, I just picked that number out of the air; I have no idea what the
> cheapest FF DSLR costs.
Just FYI, this whole round of "FF debate" was predicated on a rumor
that Canon would be releasing a 24x36 mm sensor body in the
"inexpensive"
Having read this thread for a while now, I have a few random thoughts:
1. I have a 645 camera that fits fine in my hand. I never felt cheated
that my 35 mm cameras couldn't take a larger format even the advantages
of the larger format are obvious. The very definition of the 24x36
sensor as "full
It's nothing to do with the age of the aircraft, and everything
to do with choices made by the aircraft operator. Just what is
provided in the way of services at each seat depends on what the
operator specifies, but just about every aircraft being flown
today could provide payphone service if the
Yes. But ultimately, eventually, it's sensor size, whether they're chemical
or electronic photon catchers, that determines maximum obtainable image
quality. Having a camera whose physical size is pefect for the hand and
can/could accommodate a full frame but has an APS sized sensor really feels
From: "Gonz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I thought that the photosites were not color sensitive, i.e. they are
> B&W with a Bayer filter pattern in front, so they all would light up
> equally with temp, no?
Yes, and there is some noise all over; however, the sensor is receiving
photons through the fro
That's "2.3 stops" to 100%.
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> The active photosite area in the K10D sensor is around 20-30% of the
> chip area. There's a long ways to go before we get anywhere near a
> 100% efficient collector surface...
>
> G
>
> On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:55 AM
Well put, Godders.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Oct 15, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> > This is valid argument. However, I cannot spend both time and effort,
> > *and* the money each time there is a ch
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
