> http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-
> photography/news/1653040/the-taught-world-photograph
>
that's a nice shot of him with his LX. His books are excellent.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PD
It's a lovely lens,.you won't regret it.
On 6/8/2010 6:46 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/2010/06/eilert-mehl-in-deep-shit.html
I've just enabled myself with a brand new FA 20-35/4 The intention is
to use it as a light walk about.
The other intention is to force myself to g
I'll be boring you all with one more from the Renasanse Fest.
I couldn't figure out if thse two were paying customers or paid
entertainers. Their costumes seemed a bit too accurate but you never know.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20goodwives.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D
On 2010-06-08 19:31 , Doug Franklin wrote:
Your practice must be different than mine. I sometimes shoot 20-30GB a
day, and transfer it all at the end of the day, in my hotel room or
tent. A 40% or so delta would make a /huge/ difference to me. That's the
main reason I always use the card reader i
On 6/8/2010 8:11 PM, Richard D Bush wrote:
Boris,
The cell phone photo is very good. Maybe it won't stand a 16x20
enlargement, but it is most usable for lots of things.
RB
One of which, as I am going to try to find out could be web publication ;-).
Thanks!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Jack, I thought I might make the "Riddle" look totally identifiable in
real life - it is some kind of bars attached to the wall, probably to
hold external a/c unit... So I thought, I'd leave in some cues ;-).
As for cell phone shot, I am thinking I pre-focused on the grass and
then recomposed,
I have to admit, Chris, that I am afraid...
:-(
Boris
On 6/8/2010 10:10 PM, Chris Mitchell wrote:
Intermittently, it's not auto focussing in the middle distance on my K-7 (so
SDM). I've tried it on many types of subject and when it goes wrong, it
hunts and the only option for me is to focus m
On 6/9/2010 1:09 AM, Bob W wrote:
<
http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/06/lightroom_30_now_available.h
tml>
< https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/tdrc/index.cfm?product=photoshop_lightroom>
Called my local Adobe representative. No game for me. It hasn't reached
as here just yet.
Does
On 6/9/2010 12:42 AM, Bob W wrote:
that's all quite reasonable, but Boris wants to split the catalogue itself,
not the collection of files - different problem.
Bob
Bob's right.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On 6/8/2010 9:49 PM, William Robb wrote:
Apparently you've never been to Weyburn.
William Robb
And apparently you've never been to Israel ;-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the l
I still remember learning to 'take a step closer' before snapping the shutter.
This improved my pictures a lot.
You're obviously in a different spot, but maybe the old idea can serve you too.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
> http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/2010/
The SAMBA HOWTO has all the info you need, a Mac will read from a
SAMBA share just fine, it's in fact the native filesharing system for
OS X. You should also be able to setup SAMBA shares from the GUI tools
in Ubuntu.
netatalk, afp and avahi are all for sharing with Mac OS Classic, not OS X.
-Ada
My current photography workflow is to copy my raw files from the SD card onto
my Linux box (running ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx).
I then scp copies of them onto the external drive of my iMac (running 10.6.3),
giving me two copies, on separate hardware.
I then import them into lightroom, rename them
Subject: Re: RIP: John Hedgecoe
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:36 -0400, "David Parsons"
http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/1653040/the-taught-world-photograph
Sad. I still have a couple of his books. Although I don't refer to
them often these days, they were constant
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:53 -0400, "Ed Keeney" wrote:
> I'm in the market for a new lens and looking for sage advice from the
> list.
>
> I'm currently using a K100D with the following zoom's...
> FA 70-200 4-5.6
> FA 100-300 4.5-5.6
>
> I find that the longer 100-300 is a little heavy s
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:29:16PM -0400, Doug Franklin wrote:
> On 2010-06-08 14:38, steve harley wrote:
>> a slight diversion, but i think it's worth mentioning that some
>> computers have card readers built-in, which may seem a small
>> convenience, but if you use it enough it can be a major sel
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:36 -0400, "David Parsons"
wrote:
> http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/1653040/the-taught-world-photograph
>
Sad. I still have a couple of his books. Although I don't refer to
them often these days, they were constant companions when I was get
Either of those lenses will make you consider yourself very lucky that the FA
70-200 died.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Tue, 6/8/10, Ed Keeney wrote:
> From: Ed Keeney
> Subject: Lens Help
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 9:53 PM
> I'm in the mar
You should check with Jack Davis for sample shots with the 55-300.
It seems to be a much better lens than I would have thought.
I can tell you that unless you are prepared to spend some big bucks,
you are not going to get any better than this one at the 300+ end.
You really need to decide whether
What Adam said. The DA 50-200 is a lot of lens for the money.
On Jun 8, 2010, at 10:00 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> The DA 50-200 is a wee gem of a lens. I'm constantly and pleaseantly
> surprised when I use it.
>
> -Adam
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Ed Keeney wrote:
>> I'm in the market for
The DA 50-200 is a wee gem of a lens. I'm constantly and pleaseantly
surprised when I use it.
-Adam
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Ed Keeney wrote:
> I'm in the market for a new lens and looking for sage advice from the list.
>
> I'm currently using a K100D with the following zoom's...
> FA
I'm in the market for a new lens and looking for sage advice from the list.
I'm currently using a K100D with the following zoom's...
FA 70-200 4-5.6
FA 100-300 4.5-5.6
I find that the longer 100-300 is a little heavy so I tend to lean to
the smaller 70-200. My problem is that the short
http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/1653040/the-taught-world-photograph
--
Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
On 2010-06-08 13:59, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11102572
:-)
That reminds me of my attempts to get "decent" photos of a deer that got
out onto the track at Road Atlanta during one of the early Petit le Mans
races. I was about as successful at stopping
On 2010-06-08 19:07, steve harley wrote:
using the SD slot on the computer: 112 seconds (15.7 MB/sec)
using a PNY "150x SDHC" reader: 130 seconds (13.5 MB/sec)
using the USB cable to connect to my K200d: 193 seconds (9.1 MB/sec)
in practice, this is not a huge difference though, because i usu
On 2010-06-08 14:38, steve harley wrote:
a slight diversion, but i think it's worth mentioning that some
computers have card readers built-in, which may seem a small
convenience, but if you use it enough it can be a major selling point; i
certainly use the SD slot in my computer a lot
And if yo
You should be able to get cards and stickers from any printer (any
printer worth their salt would be able to do this).
It's a pretty good idea really. There is a printer across the street
from me, I'll go over tomorrow and ask what it would cost for a set.
More than VistaPrint for sure. :)
On T
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:54 +0100, "Bob W" wrote:
> >
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/NSW-Qld_May_2010/index.html
> >
> >
> > What say you? Any other suggestions? The uncropped version is No:1
> > and
> > the final image is a quick and dirty B&W conversion to see if there's
> > any potentia
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:24 -0700, "Bruce Dayton"
wrote:
> I'm with Bob on this one. Because the girl is not THE subject, but
> more of a prop - as you described, cropping to make her more
> prominent doesn't really help. So I vote for uncropped with darker
> clouds.
Thanks, Bruce.
It shall be
Hi Ann
Thanks for the feedback.
The 'posed' look is just a result of when I pressed the shutter release.
She may or may not have known I was taking a photo but she didn't stop
walking.
I agree about the B&W version. It was just a quick attempt to see if
there was any potential there. If I dec
I picked one up, and never use it.
The thing I liked the best was a plastic greycard about the size of a business
card. Unfortunately, mine went awol, and I need to get another.
I wish I could get business card stock in neutral grey and print my business
cards on it, so that I'd always have gre
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
This one is submitted for the humor value.
Photography is like fishing: sometimes it seems that the big catch
always gets away.
Over the weekend, I looked out my window to see three fawns playing in
the back yard. (By now, you all know how I love to photograph deer,
a
On 2010-06-08 14:22 , Adam Maas wrote:
My PC has a SD reader in it. Like most built-in readers it's
convenient but rather much on the slow side. I use my Sandisk 12-in-1
reader instead.
i'd be interested to hear how fast it is in practice
the MacBook Pro SD reader is pretty fast; Apple says it
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/2010/06/eilert-mehl-in-deep-shit.html
I've just enabled myself with a brand new FA 20-35/4 The intention is
to use it as a light walk about.
The other intention is to force myself to go closer. I definately
think I need it.
So far it has been a joy to use :-)
--
Ma
I have a 77mm Expo disk if thats what you are referring to. I used it
for two years on my equine work. Worked well.
Dave
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> I hadn't heard of these. Has anyone tried them and, if so, do they work?
>
> --
> Steve Desjardins
>
> --
> PDML P
Bill Robb wrote:
"A guy I vaguely know who lives a couple of hours from here has been quietly
buying 645 lenses for fairly cheap ever since the P645D was announced. He's
fairly excited about this camera."
That makes two of us! I've been stalking 645 lenses "on the quiet" for a
few months now mys
<
http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/06/lightroom_30_now_available.h
tml >
< https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/tdrc/index.cfm?product=photoshop_lightroom >
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vis
Awfully nice to read, Bruce.
Prime opportunity for, perhaps, the next couple months.
Tried to get this shot at sunrise, but got held up for 20 or 30 minutes, by
roadwork, at the Bridalveil turn off. Day dawned completely cloudless, so
really didn't make that much difference. The sun has to be wel
Grateful for your pleasing comment, Dan!
Jack
--- On Tue, 6/8/10, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> From: Daniel J. Matyola
> Subject: Re: PESO: Cathedral Rocks
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 1:53 PM
> Gorgeous! I prefer the color
> version.
>
> Dan
>
> On Tue, Ju
>
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/NSW-Qld_May_2010/index.html
>
>
> What say you? Any other suggestions? The uncropped version is No:1
> and
> the final image is a quick and dirty B&W conversion to see if there's
> any potential there.
stick with the first one. Her head is on the intersecti
Nice of you Cotty. Thanks!
Jack
--- On Tue, 6/8/10, Cotty wrote:
> From: Cotty
> Subject: Re: PESO: Cathedral Rocks
> To: "pentax list"
> Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 1:48 PM
> On 8/6/10, Jack Davis,
> discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >B&W..
>
> >http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.
> >> He probably meant to say Weyburn Saskatchewan.
>
> >
> > Bill, by saying that someone else is not bad, I don't immediately
> imply
> > that you're not so... Jealousy is one of the deadly sins, if I am not
> > mistaken ;-).
> >
>
> Apparently you've never been to Weyburn.
>
He's been to Nic
> > Suppose I've a LR catalog A. Now, it is very big and I want to take
> > part of it out and make a separate catalog (suppose it is all my
> > family album pictures for sake of example). So I make catalog B that
> > contains a subset of pictures from catalog A. I then go and remove
> > from A all
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Bob W wrote:
> This PC ( a netbook ) has an SD reader built in. The bigger computer (17"
> laptop) has a multicard reader built in. All very convenient except they
> didn't include CF, which is what I use in the Olympus.
>
> Bob
I have four cameras that all use CF
>I would have them marched off the premises and sent
> >> to live in Boise, Idaho.
> >
> > I happen to know at least one man living exactly there and he seems
> like
> > a good guy to me... ;-)
> >
>
> He probably meant to say Weyburn Saskatchewan.
>
I sure did, but Boise Idaho is easier to pro
>
> Basically, what I want is to retain the completeness of my keywords
> data
> base, so that if I want to find photos of my daughter or photos of
> Jerusalem, I won't have to remember to search both in my local photo
> collection and in those photos that I shot when you came. Though I
> suppose
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:43 -0400, "David J Brooks"
> wrote:
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11103020
>>
>> From Sibbald's Point. There are a number of stones were the bush as
>> crept up to them and some
>> have been swallowed up i
[...]
>
> In fact, Bob, you don't have to convince me that I could live without
> this feature, 'cause I've been alive so far. I am thinking that my life
> would be slightly easier with this capability. The rest as usual, is up
> to time and Adobe Dilberts...
>
actually, I don't think it is a ma
This PC ( a netbook ) has an SD reader built in. The bigger computer (17"
laptop) has a multicard reader built in. All very convenient except they
didn't include CF, which is what I use in the Olympus.
Bob
>
> My PC has a SD reader in it. Like most built-in readers it's
> convenient but rather
Mine is about 8 1.2 years old and on USB 1. Take it from there.:-)
Dave
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:38 PM, steve harley wrote:
> a slight diversion, but i think it's worth mentioning that some computers
> have card readers built-in, which may seem a small convenience, but if you
> use it enough it
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 8/6/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>BTW: Next year marks the 10th anniversary of the first PDML meetup at
>>the Grandfather Mountain Nature Photography Weekend.
>
> Oh sweet Jesus - now you've gone and done it.
>
> GFM ena
On 6/8/2010 12:28 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Isn't that the 'Apple' way? Tight control?
/Strict/ control, (ask Cotty).
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface
Wonderful image! I much prefer the color for this one. Boy do I
have to get down there!
--
Bruce
Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 1:36:00 PM, you wrote:
JD> I'm given you a couple or three days break, but that's it!
JD> Another look at Bridalveil falls, but isolated with the feature known as
Cathedra
Gorgeous! I prefer the color version.
Dan
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> I'm given you a couple or three days break, but that's it!
> Another look at Bridalveil falls, but isolated with the feature known as
> Cathedral Rocks.
> Shot from Tunnel View, the valley's most popu
On 8/6/10, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>B&W..
>http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=518
Captivating :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Di
A frosted Pringles cap or coffee can lid works exactly the same.
Perrsonally, I'll take my WB off a sheet of white paper when I have to
set a custom WB.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> I hadn't heard of these. Has anyone tried them and, if so, do they work?
>
> --
>
I'm given you a couple or three days break, but that's it!
Another look at Bridalveil falls, but isolated with the feature known as
Cathedral Rocks.
Shot from Tunnel View, the valley's most popular photo location.
Comments warmly received.
Jack
Color..
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/deta
On 8/6/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>BTW: Next year marks the 10th anniversary of the first PDML meetup at
>the Grandfather Mountain Nature Photography Weekend.
Oh sweet Jesus - now you've gone and done it.
GFM enablement...whatever next?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
My PC has a SD reader in it. Like most built-in readers it's
convenient but rather much on the slow side. I use my Sandisk 12-in-1
reader instead.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:38 PM, steve harley wrote:
> a slight diversion, but i think it's worth mentioning that some computers
> have card readers bu
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Adam Maas wrote:
>
>>Your meter is calibrated for approximately 12.5% grey (ISO
>>standard).
>
> I believe it's ANSI standard "ANSI PH3.49-1971" As far as I know it
> hasn't been made into an ISO standard. Did I miss it?
ISO 2720:1974 and ISO
I do that, but instead of copying the files back and forth to work on
them, I just added my storage drive into LR so it can see them
directly. Most of the time the folder isn't connected, but when I
need to access them, I browse to the folder in Windows, and it
reconnects, then LR can access the f
sounds more like the af itself - they don't call it saFOX hunt for othing...
2010/6/8 Chris Mitchell :
> Intermittently, it's not auto focussing in the middle distance on my K-7 (so
> SDM). I've tried it on many types of subject and when it goes wrong, it
> hunts and the only option for me is to f
On Jun 8, 2010, at 14:38, Sam L wrote:
>>
>> You could do it that way, but it's much more work than you need to go
>> through.
>>
>> Next time you want to edit an old photo... click on the question-mark in the
>> corner of the thumbnail and it will ask you where you want it to look for
>> the
>On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>> On Jun 8, 2010, at 13:23, Sam L wrote:
>> For the physical files in the directories above, he leaves the newer
>> files on his laptop. But the old stuff (say anything before 2008) he
>> removes the files/directories and stores them physi
Adam Maas wrote:
>Your meter is calibrated for approximately 12.5% grey (ISO
>standard).
I believe it's ANSI standard "ANSI PH3.49-1971" As far as I know it
hasn't been made into an ISO standard. Did I miss it?
>Cards are calibrated to 18% grey (Kodak's choice at Ansel
>Adams suggestion). Thus
You can get a "Digital" greycard, specificly for DSLR's, I have one, works
really well. IIRC I got it for free on a camera mag cover here in the UK,
lighter in colour to the Kodak grey cards which I also own for film use
Regards,
John
From: pdml-boun...@
Intermittently, it's not auto focussing in the middle distance on my K-7 (so
SDM). I've tried it on many types of subject and when it goes wrong, it
hunts and the only option for me is to focus manually.
Has anyone else had this problem? Is it the "SDM" issue that others have
mentioned? Anything o
--
From: "steve harley"
Subject: Re: OT - Abobe Woes
On 2010-06-08 12:18 , Bruce Dayton wrote:
If you could see the forest through the trees, I think you would see
it as sensible.
i see a forest of attitude through trees of poorly-aimed snark
--
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Re: Lightroom catalogs chaining (a question really)
He probably meant to say Weyburn Saskatchewan.
Bill, by saying that someone else is not bad, I don't immediately imply
that you're not so... Jealousy i
I bow to the Apple god who must always be vindicated. I'm done.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 11:37:24 AM, you wrote:
sh> On 2010-06-08 12:18 , Bruce Dayton wrote:
>> If you could see the forest through the trees, I think you would see
>> it as sensible.
sh> i see a forest of attitude thro
a slight diversion, but i think it's worth mentioning that some
computers have card readers built-in, which may seem a small
convenience, but if you use it enough it can be a major selling point; i
certainly use the SD slot in my computer a lot
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
On 2010-06-08 12:18 , Bruce Dayton wrote:
If you could see the forest through the trees, I think you would see
it as sensible.
i see a forest of attitude through trees of poorly-aimed snark
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSC
On Jun 8, 2010, at 13:23, Sam L wrote:
> For the physical files in the directories above, he leaves the newer
> files on his laptop. But the old stuff (say anything before 2008) he
> removes the files/directories and stores them physically on a backup
> drive. And the drive has the same simple fi
2010/6/8 eckinator :
>> Mine is a RRS 55mm ballhead with a lever-clamped quick-release.
>> http://reallyrightstuff.com/mmRRS/Images/gallery/BH55LR.png
>>
>> Which I feel very good about.
>
> Looks nice like it can hold its own. Like the double portrait cutouts.
The winning point for me at the time
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Suppose I've a LR catalog A. Now, it is very big and I want to take
> part of it out and make a separate catalog (suppose it is all my
> family album pictures for sake of example). So I make catalog B that
> contains a subset of pi
If you could see the forest through the trees, I think you would see
it as sensible.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 10:47:23 AM, you wrote:
sh> On 2010-06-08 11:32 , Bruce Dayton wrote:
>> Seem to have touched a raw nerve.
>>
sh> eh? just wasn't a sensible comment
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
This one is submitted for the humor value.
Photography is like fishing: sometimes it seems that the big catch
always gets away.
Over the weekend, I looked out my window to see three fawns playing in
the back yard. (By now, you all know how I love to photograph deer,
and especially fawns.) I gr
On 2010-06-08 11:32 , Bruce Dayton wrote:
Seem to have touched a raw nerve.
eh? just wasn't a sensible comment
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the direc
Seem to have touched a raw nerve.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 10:29:04 AM, you wrote:
sh> On 2010-06-08 10:28 , Bruce Dayton wrote:
>> Isn't that the 'Apple' way? Tight control?
>>
sh> it has nothing to do with Apple -- if the school were using Windows it
sh> seems clear they'd have a si
On 2010-06-08 10:28 , Bruce Dayton wrote:
Isn't that the 'Apple' way? Tight control?
it has nothing to do with Apple -- if the school were using Windows it
seems clear they'd have a similar policy; i've seen the same kind of
policy (for Windows and/or Mac) in various environments with share
Oops. I'm apparently sending Rich Text messages to this list again.
RESEN
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:17 PM, eckinator wrote:
> IIRC there is a way to correct this in LR.
Of course you can correct it. The idea of using the white balance cap
shot is so you don't have to.
: )
Sure it (expodisc a
2010/6/8 AlunFoto :
>
> Not a Burzinsky. I think they look just too weird... :-)
LOL yeah the guy has a free mind... who needs design anyway =)
> Mine is a RRS 55mm ballhead with a lever-clamped quick-release.
> http://reallyrightstuff.com/mmRRS/Images/gallery/BH55LR.png
>
> Which I feel very goo
2010/6/8 Adam Maas :
> A couple things to remember:
>
> 1. Grey cards aren't always neutral. The Kodak ones in particular are
> somewhat warm.
>
> 2. Your meter is calibrated for approximately 12.5% grey (ISO
> standard). Cards are calibrated to 18% grey (Kodak's choice at Ansel
> Adams suggestion)
Boris,
The cell phone photo is very good. Maybe it won't stand a 16x20
enlargement, but it is most usable for lots of things.
RB
On Jun 8, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Two PESOs:
#22 - A riddle: http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/06/peso-2010-22-riddle.html
#23 - Cell ph
Cotty wrote:
>On 6/6/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>The weekend was long, beautiful, grueling and rewarding. Nothing beats
>>seeing old friends at such a fabulous place for such a great event.
>
>Stef and I reminisced about last year's trip by looking through some
>pics and vide
Like "Riddle." Can't be certain, but I might like it better with the gray
smudges/shadows on the left removed and with a slight crop of that edge.
Cell phone shot raises a question as to the focus point. It appears
impractically low in the frame. May, of course, just be true in this image.(?)
Ov
Hi!
Two PESOs:
#22 - A riddle: http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/06/peso-2010-22-riddle.html
#23 - Cell phone experiment:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/06/peso-2010-23-cell-phone-project.html
Be brutal and honest, as usual.
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
On 8/6/10, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
>See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil...
;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.n
See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil...
--
Bruce
Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 9:35:53 AM, you wrote:
C> On 8/6/10, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>Isn't that the 'Apple' way? Tight control?
C> Ridiculous!
C> --
C> Cheers,
C> Cotty
C> ___/\__
C> || (O) | People, Place
On 8/6/10, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Isn't that the 'Apple' way? Tight control?
Ridiculous!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@
Isn't that the 'Apple' way? Tight control?
--
Bruce
Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 6:19:51 AM, you wrote:
JS> This is probably going to be my last on Mac vs PC for now. I'm getting
JS> busy at school and barely have time to follow the list.
JS> There are about 70 students in my class, broken into th
I'm with Bob on this one. Because the girl is not THE subject, but
more of a prop - as you described, cropping to make her more
prominent doesn't really help. So I vote for uncropped with darker
clouds.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 5:12:52 AM, you wrote:
BS> Brian,
BS> All l
A couple things to remember:
1. Grey cards aren't always neutral. The Kodak ones in particular are
somewhat warm.
2. Your meter is calibrated for approximately 12.5% grey (ISO
standard). Cards are calibrated to 18% grey (Kodak's choice at Ansel
Adams suggestion). Thus grey cards do not actually f
On 8/6/10, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The network is also set up to be Mac only, to indoctrinate the kids
>properly from the beginning
John, you're getting the idea ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.c
I prefer a grey card. I like to think they are more accurate plus they
provide me an 18% exposure readout which the caps don't do. Also, I
kind of assume they have limitations depending on where you point your
camera. Further to that I've seen those caps sold from as low as €
1.99 (eBay) to as high
Some more than others. For me, image #1 approaches the abstract.
I agree, "all" photos leave some room, however small, for individual
interpretation.
Jack
--- On Tue, 6/8/10, Rick Womer wrote:
> From: Rick Womer
> Subject: Re: PESO - Nocturnal Chicago
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date:
Which is to say you like pix of pedestrians? I've got lots of them!
Cheers,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/7/10, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> I agree. Perhaps I've just got pedestrian tastes (not
> that that should
> be taken as inferring that Jack has :-)>
>
>
>
> Cheer
Thanks, Jack!
Most photos provide openings for individual interpretation, of course...
Cheers,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/7/10, Jack Davis wrote:
> I relate more to the second. Nicely
> composed, Rick!
> I see the first as simply providing a scene open to
> individual
Thanks, Bob. My interest in nighttime shooting has been increasing, and was a
big reason for my getting a K7.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/7/10, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Rick,
> Interesting photos. I put the camera away when it's
> dark out. I'll
> have to rethink that no
Hey Charles,
Hmm. I might have just been unlucky. I was certainly very happy when it
returned to normal!
Barry
>> Indeed, while I was on this recent trip, a VERY well aimed, massive
>> raindrop at the lead of a major thunderstom cracked into the back of my
>> K10. I blew the water out, but
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo