On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Bob W wrote:
>>
>> I feel the on/off switch on this particular specimen is likely to give
> trouble in
>> the future, due to the feel of it compared to all the others I have
> fondled.
>> Apart from that, I can think of no reason for what occured. Anyone else
> hav
On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
I like reds that pop also - shot velvia for many years because of
the saturated look.
On my calibrated monitor most of the reds have a mottled/uneven/
somewhat 'dirty' appearance - distracting IMO.
Odd. I'm not seeing that. Looking at that same
Why do I bother? I guess because it's a bit of a challenge. The
interface is a PITA, but the gallery has some really wonderful images,
that I enjoy seeing, although I wish I could see larger versions.
The picture of the yellow stairs seems broken because I cropped it
that way. It was a very tig
I've read, somewhere, that there is camera body build date info embedded
somewhere in the RAW EXIF data. Don't recall where or if I recall correctly.
Anyone..anyone..?
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE fro
On 27 August 2010 04:04, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> In any event, one thing that bothers me is the way the size limitation
> is structured. The recommended image size is 600 pixels high. There
> is no stated limit on width, however. That means the images in
> portrait orientation are much small
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:25 +1000, "Rob Studdert"
wrote:
> On 27 August 2010 04:04, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> > In any event, one thing that bothers me is the way the size limitation
> > is structured. The recommended image size is 600 pixels high. There
> > is no stated limit on width, howeve
On 2010-08-26 14:22 , Ken Waller wrote:
The photo permits for professionals in Denali are severely restricted
and not available to all that apply.
There is only one two lane road, around 90 miles long, in Denali and
most of the road traffic is for the park run tour busses. In some places
there is
Brian Walters wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:25 +1000, "Rob Studdert"
wrote:
I've long since stopped pondering what will make an 'acceptable' image
for the PPG. I just submit images that I like and shrug my shoulders
when they're rejected
I participate for the challenge but I can't imagine
-goldsgym-pec's-flex
That should do it.:-)
Dave
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> I've read, somewhere, that there is camera body build date info embedded
> somewhere in the RAW EXIF data. Don't recall where or if I recall correctly.
> Anyone..anyone..?
>
> Jack
>
>
>
>
> --
On Aug 26, 2010, at 6:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:25 +1000, "Rob Studdert"
> wrote:
>> On 27 August 2010 04:04, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>>
>>> In any event, one thing that bothers me is the way the size limitation
>>> is structured. The recommended image size is 600
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:14 -0400, "paul stenquist"
wrote:
>
> >
> > I participate for the challenge but I can't imagine that anyone would
> > ever go there to view my images, or anyone else's for that matter. That
> > interface is simply bizzare. Waiting while the 12 generic images load
> t
>
The only long term addiction I have is my wife, and that's because she fights
back.
-Original Message-
From: eckinator
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:56:18
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: OT KBA vs LBA
Anyone else here
On Aug 26, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:14 -0400, "paul stenquist"
> wrote:
>>
>
>>>
>>> I participate for the challenge but I can't imagine that anyone would
>>> ever go there to view my images, or anyone else's for that matter. That
>>> interface is simpl
On 27 August 2010 10:50, Brian Walters wrote:
> I notice that if you hover the mouse over those images, the
> photographer's name and image title appears. Is that a new feature? I
> hadn't noticed it before.
To the best of my recollection it's always done that.
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image
Yup. Just download Photo-ME, assuming you have a PC, and it will show you all
kinds of interesting EXIF stuff; not only the build date, but such things as
the temperature of the sensor when you took the shot. Works on JPGs too, IIRC.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Thu, 8/26/10, J
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:12 -0700, "Rick Womer"
wrote:
> Yup. Just download Photo-ME, assuming you have a PC, and it will show
> you all kinds of interesting EXIF stuff; not only the build date, but
> such things as the temperature of the sensor when you took the shot.
> Works on JPGs too, IIRC.
>
On 27 August 2010 12:12, Rick Womer wrote:
> Yup. Just download Photo-ME, assuming you have a PC, and it will show you
> all kinds of interesting EXIF stuff; not only the build date, but such things
> as the temperature of the sensor when you took the shot. Works on JPGs too,
> IIRC.
True, h
Yeah, one has to be pretty well adjusted to wait out the time lag, doubtless
created do to lack of interest in voting.
Still, it's a healthy incentive stimulated by the challenge of having their
photographic efforts find approval.
The proof is in the obvious satisfaction gleefully expressed by ma
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "steve harley"
Subject: Re: OT More local photogs rights controversy
On 2010-08-26 14:22 , Ken Waller wrote:
The photo permits for professionals in Denali are severely restricted
and not avai
Larry Colen wrote:
I didn't get the job I interviewed for today, so WTF, I'm heading to burning man.
I don't expect so, but is anyone else going?
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
Larry _ i'm not (of course!)
But my young friend Kate Goldwater is...
this is kate:
htt
I gave up a long time ago and pulled all my pictures off. Between the very
inconsistent voting and the crazy interface it just wasn't worth the
aggravation. Haven't been to the site in a long time.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail.
"Jack Davis" wrote:
>Yeah, one has to be pretty
"Ann Sanfedele" wrote:
>Larry Colen wrote:
>
>>I didn't get the job I interviewed for today, so WTF, I'm heading to burning
>>man.
>>
>>I don't expect so, but is anyone else going?
>>
>>--
>>Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Larry _ i'm not (of course!)
I
--
From: "steve harley"
Subject: Re: OT More local photogs rights controversy
my overall point was that i tried to follow up on William's statements and
couldn't find restrictions he seemed to have run into, but i'm interested
to learn what res
On Aug 25, 2010, at 16:05 , Rob Studdert wrote:
On 25 August 2010 22:56, eckinator wrote:
Anyone else here suffer from Knife Buying Addiction as well? And do
you feel some of the below?
I have a set of 8 bog stock WÜSTHOF Classics, my most favored of
which is the
16cm cook's knife, it does
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:31 -0400, "Ann Sanfedele"
wrote:
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
> >I didn't get the job I interviewed for today, so WTF, I'm heading to burning
> >man.
> >
> >I don't expect so, but is anyone else going?
> >
> >--
> >Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
> >
Well, I wa
Miserere wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm back from my UK trip, and I'm happy to report that I both took
> photos, and was not stopped by the police for doing so. I'll have some
> from London in a few days, but for now here's a small gallery from a
> jet-lagged walk around Southampton:
>
> http://en
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
