On 4/9/2011 18:06, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The comment relating to Man Ray, however, gave me the thought that if
you pushed it just a little further into the graphic arts domain, it
would work in the same way that many of the surrealist/Dada photograms
and other such works do. The lines and forms
very good
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Larry Colen
> Sent: 11 April 2011 03:48
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: PESO s spinning fire
>
> I was at a birthday party last night and they brought out the poi to
> spin
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Rob Studdert
> http://www.nickbrandt.com/index.cfm
>
I've seen some of his work before. It has a nostalgic quality about it that
makes it seem as though they're all extinct already.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:17 AM, Bob W wrote:
> very good
Thanks.
>
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
t
It is probably named Henery Hawk then =)
2011/4/11 Jeffery Johnson :
> Thank You so much Matthew Hunt for helping me identify that my captured bird
> is a Cooper's Hawk.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Jeffery Johnson
> S
Here it is simply reduced in size:
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/15174580_NVzVH#1247710481_yspUL-L-LB
I'm too used to Pentax. I always reduce and sharpen a bit since it's
set pretty low on most Pentax bodies.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
> Hi Steve:
On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
> I particularly like #2. By RTF you mean some sort of flash?
Yes it's the built in flash. I forget what RTF stands for. I'm on an
anti-inflammatory which is destroying my brain, and I've helped it along with a
little bourbon.
These pills are quit
On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:05 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Nice crisp shot, David! This is my introduction to the Fantail. I'm going to
> have to look them up in my bird book. I don't recall seeing such here in
> California.
There are a few different species. Ours is the New Zealand fantail. One of
t
Damn Bill, you're a poet.
-Original Message-
From: William Robb
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:33:44
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Another enablement
Love the 40LTD for it's field of view, hate the lens for everything
Just received mine today, will just have to see for myself how it compares to
the stock screen of K-5.
After reading some reviews about focusingscreen being slow with shipping I was
pleasantly surprised - got it in four days.
kris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/
Ah sorry for adding to the confusion then, I misunderstood.
Interestingly, older sensors quite often used CYM sensor sites rather than
RGB. There was a shift toward "primary" colour sensor arrays however,
generally because they were considered to give more accurate representations
of colours.
On Apr 11, 2011, at 2:59 AM, Peter Loveday wrote:
> Ah sorry for adding to the confusion then, I misunderstood.
>
> Interestingly, older sensors quite often used CYM sensor sites rather than
> RGB. There was a shift toward "primary" colour sensor arrays however,
> generally because they were
On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "William Robb"
>
>>
>> I use a similar method to yours for dialing in lenses. I focus on an object
>> (in my case a clock dial) at some distance from the camera using center
>> point AF, and I then
> The clock can show that you're not achieving good focus, but it
> can't tell you which way to go with the adjustment.
> Paul
OTOH you can always know how much time you have wasted :)
kris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCR
Mark, I wonder if there is any way to capitalize on the Boston
Marathon next week...? Dana-Farber fields a large team of runners
every year to help them fund-raise (this is my brother's 3rd year on
the team), maybe there is a sales opportunity there somewhere? Of
course, time is short now, but it
Hi!
DFA 50/2.8 Macro arrived today. Got immediately amazed by the fact that
focus ring does not seem to rotate when AF is in action and the clamp
switch is really convenient too...
I plan to use it a bit but then I am going to suggest that Galia mounts
it on her K-7 and keeps it there for at
On 4/11/2011 04:33, William Robb wrote:
Love the 40LTD for it's field of view, hate the lens for everything else
so
I decided that perhaps a 43 LTD was in my future, and probably sooner
rather than later.
Looked on Adorama's website and thought the price was OK, especially
since the Canadian
From: Rob Studdert
On 10 April 2011 22:23, John Sessoms wrote:
> Any protective coverings would have to be thin enough they wouldn't protrude
> materially beyond the film plane or the whole idea wouldn't work.
Which is why a true FF sensor of this type is a virtual impossibility.
You're c
I think the detail looks pretty good. Maybe another nudge of sharpening.(?)
I would certainly try either removing or greatly softening that stem (?) coming
out of the larger blossom. I might, also, remove the far left OOF blossom. If
you have any more frame on the left, suggest including the tip
From: Larry Colen
In my typical geeky fashion, I'm trying to wrap my head around all of
the ramifications of adjusting sensitivity (ISO) on my camera. Please
correct the errors in my understanding.
In the simplest form, it is a measure of how many LSBs per photon (or
tens, thousands or millions
From: "Jeffery Johnson"
I need help from someone that knows birds. I captured a bird today and I am
not sure what the bird is named. Let me know and I will send you a picture
of the bird.
http://www.whatbird.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
On 11 April 2011 22:01, John Sessoms wrote:
> You're confusing economic infeasibility with "impossible". Every day I use
> stuff that was "impossible" when I started in photography.
>
> If there's really a market for something like this, some genius will
> eventually figure out how to do it and w
The URL wraps to the next line. You just have to figure out how to paste
the rest of it into the address box. It truncates the dash at the end of
the first line.
Here's a Tiny URL that will take you there:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6bfsnkb
From: "Jeffery Johnson"
I click the link and it b
Boris,
You're a good dad!
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> DFA 50/2.8 Macro arrived today. Got immediately amazed by the fact that
> focus ring does not seem to rotate when AF is in action and the clamp switch
> is really convenient too...
>
> I pl
From: Igor Roshchin
Artists' Bill of Rights Campaign Launch happened 1 day before
and 50 years after the launch of the first human into the space.
Igor
Also 1 day prior to the 150th Anniversary of the beginning of the
American Civil War.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
I think you should just ask his parents.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:13 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: "Jeffery Johnson"
>
>> I need help from someone that knows birds. I captured a bird today and I
>> am
>> not sure what the bird is named. Let me know and I will send you a picture
>> of the bird.
On 4/7/2011 22:30, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
C) Then again, a *dedicated* flash with a bounce panel might be best,
but that would shorten my shooting distance. I really don't want to
crank the ISO past 800, just to maintain image quality. What flash,
Pentax brand or other, would you suggest?
On 4/11/2011 00:19, Bulent Celasun wrote:
... for an abstract feel.
Smaller:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12938842
Larger:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12938842&size=lg
Bulent
Though I hate suggesting a crop, I might, for sake of laconicity (<-- it
says this is not a v
On 4/10/2011 20:39, Sasha Sobol wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/5603835081/lightbox
or if you prefer flickriver:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/sobol/5603835081
Please tell me what you think.
I think that you did brilliantly producing a rather non-trivial image of
a rather trivial
On 4/11/2011 03:21, Rob Studdert wrote:
The tip is impregnated with activated carbon as I understand, this is
designed to effectively mop up oils and other contaminants. Any modern
lens coatings should remain unaffected when subjected to even the most
overzealous lens cleaning regimens so long as
On 4/7/2011 20:46, Bill Owens wrote:
Just shows a how great it is to have good neighbors/friends
Bill
Yes, absolutely so, Bill...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
> On 11 April 2011 22:01, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>> You're confusing economic infeasibility with "impossible". Every day I use
>> stuff that was "impossible" when I started in photography.
>>
>> If there's really a market for something like this,
I like that more. The push to an abstractive collection of shapes,
tones and textures removes it further from my eye trying to "make
sense" of it as representational and trying to orient it "correctly".
Good stuff!
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 4/9/2011 18:06, God
these are very sweet! I favor 2,4,5, 8, 10. especially - I think - 8
and 10...
Better than half-decent :-) Sooo hard to photo "dickey-birds". What
a charmer
he is!
ann
David Mann wrote:
I had a great time with a little fantail this afternoon. They aren't shy at
all - if you're carefu
I've given up on focus charts--way too slow and hard to judge except with fast
lenses.
Using moire patterns, though, works beautifully. Here is the info:
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/cameras/1ds3_af_micoadjustment.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/6e4yng
Rick
http://photo.net/ph
I'm sure I saw that LOOK Magazine when I was 12 years old as my parents
bought it all the time ... most of the photos, though, were
not anything I would have seen growing up there in person... though I
remember who Gorgeous George was. I was horrified by
boxing and wrestling.
ann
Keith Whale
I have a great deal of difficulty in photography red flowers, so i
went out and bought pink ones.
Dave
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> I took these shots this morning with the E-PL1 and my old m42 super
> Takumar 55 f2.
>
> http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml
Well that certainly jumps out at you.
Very nice
Dave
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/5603835081/lightbox
> or if you prefer flickriver:
> http://www.flickriver.com/photos/sobol/5603835081
>
> Please tell me what you think.
>
> --Sasha
>
>
I've used the moire patterns to confirm results but not in isolation. I've
found the focus charts work fine as long as the results are carefully analyzed
on the computer monitor, although it can be difficult with anything wider than
about 35mm.
Paul
On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Rick Womer wrot
Nice angle here.
Dave
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Thomas Bohn wrote:
> Today I've seen this broken roof, the rest of the building doesn't
> look to good either:
>
> http://www.23hq.com/tehabe/photo/6635117
>
> I hope you like it.
>
> Thomas
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.
That works well. I like the fade you have here.
Dave
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
> Seems to be the theme this week ;-).
>
> http://aguilapaw.posterous.com/
>
> Cheers, Christine
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
Yes :-)
ann
DagT wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA*16-50mm@50, 1/80s, f/2.8, ISO200
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, p
Nice composition... have you tried doing the brightness and contrast
stuff instead of desaturating to get more detail?
(I may be late to the party here)
ann
Steven Desjardins wrote:
I took these shots this morning with the E-PL1 and my old m42 super
Takumar 55 f2.
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/P
It could be an Oriental Poppy ??? but looks like a wide open tulip to me
,too.
Sasha, do you have other photos that show more of the flower in its
surroindings for ID/
ann
Sasha Sobol wrote:
Thanks everyone.
Larry, I am not sure but I think it is a tulip.
It is big and red.
Not California
From: David Mann
On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
> I particularly like #2. By RTF you mean some sort of flash?
Yes it's the built in flash. I forget what RTF stands for.
Retractable TTL-Auto Flash.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Love the feel to this
Dave
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:45 PM, DagT wrote:
> http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
> K-5, DA*16-50mm@50, 1/80s, f/2.8, ISO200
>
>
> DagT
> http://www.thrane.name/
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailma
Jeff - send it to me...
I'd like to see if I know before using JOhn's what bird :-)
ann
John Sessoms wrote:
From: "Jeffery Johnson"
I need help from someone that knows birds. I captured a bird today
and I am
not sure what the bird is named. Let me know and I will send you a
picture
of the
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:19:16PM +0930, Peter Loveday wrote:
>
> The usual sensor uses basically three types of element -- R, G and B
> -- in a particular layout.
> Why not X Y Z where X = R+G, Y = R+G+B, Z = G+B ?
>
> You can get RGB from XYZ easily enough:
>
> Y-X = R+G+B - R+G = B
> Y-Z =
Yes, waiting for the ice to break :-)
Den 11. apr. 2011 kl. 06.57 skrev Christine Aguila:
> Hi DagT: are those birds in that photo? Cheers, Christine
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "DagT"
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 4:45 PM
> Subject: PAW66 - S
On 2011-04-10 07:40 , Boris Liberman wrote:
I bought a LensPen. Tried it on a back screen of my camera and it worked
wonders.
Now, I only want to know whether it is safe to use LensPen on a lens
numerous times as I don't think I fully understand the way it works.
i've been using LensPens for y
Gorgeous George would have been on the downhill side of his career by
the time I came along, and I wouldn't have seen these images except
maybe going through old magazines in the library stacks.
Still, there's magic in those old B&W images I think we've lost with
digital. I know you can make B
Nice!
DagT
http://www.thrane.name
Den 11. apr. 2011 kl. 01.09 skrev Christine Aguila:
> Seems to be the theme this week ;-).
>
> http://aguilapaw.posterous.com/
>
> Cheers, Christine
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> t
The commonness of images in the digital age has cheapened images in
general. You once had to buy a magazine to look at amazing
photography. The problem is that the world moves on and even if you
could reproduce this look it would be a niche "style".
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:58 PM, John Sessoms
The funny part is that we were all just commenting on the vivid reds
of Kodachrome and here I am with this shot. I did find that a levels
adjustment worked, but I may want a contradiction, i.e., vivid reds
and details. I probably should try this with a different lens just to
see. It's just nice
I looked through the site, and I cannot find anything that lists the
'rights' that artists are supposed to have.
IMO, anything that asks for the people that are abusing artists to
accept that these (whatever they are) rights are something that they
should respect is doomed to failure. If they res
I spent a couple of days in Cleveland with my brother last week. Here are a
selection of shots I made of a wood duck - some just of the dude himself, some
with his dudette.
I think all are equivalent in in terms of focus, sharpness, etc. But I would be
interested in your comments on the variatio
Very nice series Dave. I particularly like 4, 5, and 10 which all stand up well
as individual shots (as well as when presented in a series.)
stan
On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:09 AM, David Mann wrote:
> I had a great time with a little fantail this afternoon. They aren't shy at
> all - if you're care
Definitely better.
The changes makes one look at it longer.
Bulent
-
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/bulentcelasun
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/ma
On 2011-04-11 01:08 , Boris Liberman wrote:
Following yours and others suggestions here is the second version:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2011/04/peso-081-have-sit.html
I wonder if I understood your correctly, guys, and processed it in the
right direction.
that's a good move in the direc
My elder son has also suggested the same modification this morning!
Done!
Thanks :)
Bulent
-
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/bulentcelasun
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@
On 2011-04-10 15:19 , Bulent Celasun wrote:
... for an abstract feel.
Larger:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12938842&size=lg
nice exposure & textures
the doorstop (if that's what it is) has the look of a large drop or
splash, but displaced from the spout
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Ma
The russian site/panoramas are excellent. Thanks for posting
On 11 April 2011 06:05, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
> For you, panorama lovers:
>
> http://www.panoramas.classic-ru.org/
>
> http://www.paris-26-gigapixels.com/index-en.html
> http://www.360cities.net/london-photo-en.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> Igo
He's alive, well, preoccupied with earning a living, and enjoying his new K5.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Boris Liberman wrote:
> From: Boris Liberman
> Subject: Where's Bruce Dayton
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Wednesday, April 6, 2011, 3:15 AM
> It s
On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:05 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Larry Colen
>>
>> It seems to me that if we are shooting a low contrast situation, such
>> as clouds on a grey sky, or with a mediocre, low contrast lens, we
>> could compensate by using a higher ISO to spread the fewer stops of
>> dynamic
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:05 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>> From: Larry Colen
>>>
>>> It seems to me that if we are shooting a low contrast situation, such
>>> as clouds on a grey sky, or with a mediocre, low contrast lens, we
>>> could compensate
On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:05 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>
>>> From: Larry Colen
It seems to me that if we are shooting a low contrast situation, such
as clouds on a grey sk
I liked the ambiguity created by the fog; the rearmost building seemed
to be superimposed onto the middle one at first sight.
Either that is intended or I have some cognitive dysfunction due to
repetitive drive/work/drive/rest cycles.
Seriously, your whole project looks solid.
Bulent
---
On Apr 11, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:05 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>>
From: Larry Colen
>
> It seems to me that if we are sh
At this point I could just as well be thinking about which movie star to date
as what lens to buy, but the phobolographer is doing a review of the Sigma
85/1.4:
http://www.thephoblographer.com/2011/04/07/field-review-sigma-85mm-f1-4-ex-dg-hsm-day-1/
and he seems to be quite impressed by it. He
On 2011-04-10 17:09 , Christine Aguila wrote:
Seems to be the theme this week ;-).
http://aguilapaw.posterous.com/
i like this image; at first i read it "urban frog" and saw a geometric
frog as the subject
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_
Tried sending this last night but it never was posted to the list.
Let's try it again...
After a long, cold winter of working on my photo album webpage and
associated management utilities; I have a bunch of stuff from 2010 and
2011 to post. In the near future I hope to post a couple of GESOs
The simple answer about extended bracketing with the K-5:
Read instruction manual (page 160). It's all there.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the d
How about trying that lens on a Sigma DSLR (with a Foveon sensor)?
I know this may not be practical but, technically, this is said to be
a strength of the said sensor.
My one and a half cents :)
Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/p
Nope!
I have the full manual Samyang (Rokinon) 85mm f/1.4 and I am very
pleased with its performance.
Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.
On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> The simple answer about extended bracketing with the K-5: Read instruction
> manual (page 160). It's all there.
For me, extended bracketing is nearly useless:
When extended bracketing is set, the file format is set to [JPEG] and cannot be
ch
The two left "Patriarchs" have a glare or bloom emitting from the lighter areas
near the top. I find it distracting and would certainly knock it down.
"Anonymous" is difficult to categorize. "Flame" colors are striking and their
pattern interesting.
Jack
--- On Mon, 4/11/11, Mitchell Conant w
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
> Adam,
>
>> The F 110/2 Planar is a gem ;-)
>
> It is surely priced like one ;)
>
> "6390$"
>
> B.
You can find them for around $1000 used, they're not terribly valuable
since no current Hasselblad body can use them as they don't have a
leaf
On Apr 10, 2011, at 12:14, Tim Bray wrote:
> Argh, my just-days-over-a-year-old Canon S90 has an obvious visible
> smudge on the sensor - or at least, there's a spot in the pictures
> that looks exactly like the effect a dust-spot on my K20 sensor
> produces. But it's a totally sealed body. Is t
All M-class. $25 each.
#1 Vivitar 1.5x teleconverter Good glass.
http://brendemuehl.net/images/pdml/vivi15.jpg
#2 Tamron Adaptall-2 adapter. Very clean.
http://brendemuehl.net/images/pdml/tpk.jpg
#3 Kiron reverse adapter, 55mm
http://brendemuehl.net/images/pdml/reverse.jpg
And ...
Tamron
Nice but I see it more in a square format. The edges of the stone are too
close to the top & bottom edge of the image IMO.
Maybe work it a little and close in on the confluence of the cracks.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Pe
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Jeffery Johnson
wrote:
> Well now that is interesting... Any way of popping it open to blow the
> sensor off. Also this might be a silly question are you sure it is on the
> sensor and not lens.
>
> Jeffery
There are two "spots" on my converted G3, but Im sure the
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> "No flash" is especially cool. Well done shots, Larry!
>
> Jack
Agreed
Dave
>
> --- On Sun, 4/10/11, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>> From: Larry Colen
>> Subject: PESO s spinning fire
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Date: Sunday, April 10, 2
I thought it was Arnold.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "eckinator"
Subject: Re: Help Naming A Bird
It is probably named Henery Hawk then =)
2011/4/11 Jeffery Johnson :
Thank You so much Matthew Hunt for helping me identif
Forgive the "creative" spelling.(?)
Comments?
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=587
K-5, DA 16~45@20mm, 1/1600, ISO 800, laying on the ground in a neighborhood
park.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBS
Stan,
#6 then #5.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Stan Halpin
wrote:
> I spent a couple of days in Cleveland with my brother last week. Here are a
> selection of shots I made of a wood duck - some just of the dude himself,
> some with his dudette.
> I think all are equivalent
very nice!
ann
Jack Davis wrote:
Forgive the "creative" spelling.(?)
Comments?
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=587
K-5, DA 16~45@20mm, 1/1600, ISO 800, laying on the ground in a neighborhood
park.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
Thanks, Ken. I'll have a play and see what I can do.
Regards,
Pete
On 12 April 2011 08:01, Ken Waller wrote:
> Nice but I see it more in a square format. The edges of the stone are too
> close to the top & bottom edge of the image IMO.
>
> Maybe work it a little and close in on the confluence
Lovely!
Bill
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Forgive the "creative" spelling.(?)
>
> Comments?
>
> Jack
>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=587
>
> K-5, DA 16~45@20mm, 1/1600, ISO 800, laying on the ground in a neighborhood
> park.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-D
An elegant shot. I like the light and the composition.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Forgive the "creative" spelling.(?)
>
> Comments?
>
> Jack
>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=587
>
> K-5, DA 16~45@20mm, 1/1600, ISO 800, laying on the ground in a ne
Since the uniquely colored wood duck is the star of this show, I'd go with
number 6.
Paul
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Stan Halpin
> wrote:
>> I spent a couple of days in Cleveland with my brother last week. Here are a
>> selection of shots I made of a wood duck - some just of the dude
1, 2 & 6 are nice and must say they are colorful...
___
Pictures that I have taken on Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jt-johnson/
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Stan
Halpin
Sen
Very nice against the blue
___
Pictures that I have taken on Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jt-johnson/
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Jack
Davis
Sent: Monday, April 11,
On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:52 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 4/11/2011 00:19, Bulent Celasun wrote:
>> ... for an abstract feel.
>>
>> Smaller:
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12938842
>>
>> Larger:
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12938842&size=lg
Coming late to the teaparty.
I like the BW border here. It makes that little bit of green interesting. Like
Ken, I wouldn't mind seeing a bit more space at top and bottom, but I think I'd
stick with the rectangular format. I wouldn't want the frame to mimic the shape
of the subject.
Paul
On Apr 11, 2011, at 2:17 AM, Peter M
On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Mitchell Conant wrote:
> Tried sending this last night but it never was posted to the list. Let's try
> it again...
>
> After a long, cold winter of working on my photo album webpage and associated
> management utilities; I have a bunch of stuff from 2010 and 2011
Thanks, Paul.
On 12 April 2011 09:23, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I like the BW border here. It makes that little bit of green interesting.
> Like Ken, I wouldn't mind seeing a bit more space at top and bottom, but I
> think I'd stick with the rectangular format. I wouldn't want the frame to
> mi
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I like the BW border here. It makes that little bit of green interesting. Like
Ken, I wouldn't mind seeing a bit more space at top and bottom, but I think I'd
stick with the rectangular format. I wouldn't want the frame to mimic the shape
of the subject.
Paul
I agree
On 11/04/2011 5:09 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Although without any indicators in the foreground or background, how can one
tell whether the camera is front focusing or back focusing? With a chart that
is at 45 degrees to the camera, you have a scale to work with. And as long as
the chart has a
I particularly like the Zion shot... wonderful BW conversion... and -
well hell, it's one of my favorite places.
The other two are certainly well done, but don't say much to me... too
much just like an exercise in technique.
ann
Mitchell Conant wrote:
Tried sending this last night but i
First one is cool!
--S
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:05 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> "No flash" is especially cool. Well done shots, Larry!
>>
>> Jack
>
> Agreed
>
> Dave
>>
>> --- On Sun, 4/10/11, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>> From: Larry Colen
>
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo