On 5/16/2013 6:01 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Standouts for me Walt:
1561
1686
1740
1761
1813
1893
1902
Bin everything else. These are fantastic.
Thank you, Steve!
I'll definitely put those on the print list. I still haven't quite got
the hang of separating the wheat from the chaff, so I
Thank you, Frank.
She's a joy to work with. I really hope I get a few more opportunities
soon. I have to say she played a big part in any of the shots that
turned out well. I gave her the most basic ideas and she just took off
from there. After that, it was just a matter of encouragement.
Fun pic. Nicely framed. Always great to see your Jays.
Paul
On May 16, 2013, at 7:53 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Another from Saturday, same jay as jay 1 but with lunch
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17326512
K-5 DFA 50-200 slight crop in LR4
Dave
--
NASA Science News for May 17, 2013
NASA researchers who monitor the Moon for meteoroid impacts have
detected an explosion ten times brighter than anything they've seen
before.
FULL STORY:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/16may_lunarimpact/
VIDEO:
Those work really well - the church is beautiful. The rendering of the
windows is spot on it seems to me, you could get some work photographing
artists stained glass efforts.
ann
On 5/16/2013 18:45, George Sinos wrote:
It's been a while, but I finally have the latest pass at the St.
Bridget's
What Ann said. Stunning photos.
Paul
On May 17, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Those work really well - the church is beautiful. The rendering of the
windows is spot on it seems to me, you could get some work photographing
artists stained glass efforts.
ann
On
Great album. Makes me realize again how much i've missed, with my numerous
canceled trips. Didn't even make the effort this year. Cant' get out of the
office now that I'm on my own.
Paul
On May 15, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
My gallery of GFM shots has
Uh. Interesting. Thanks.
In a message dated 5/16/2013 1:18:33 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
bruce.wal...@gmail.com writes:
What have you got software-wise, Marnie? You don't need much to create
a double-exposure -- Photoshop Elements for instance. I haven't tried
it but Gimp (freeware) can
Very, very nice, ann.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 5/15/2013 8:18:57 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
Took this a few months ago - dont think I ever showed you guys.
More my kind of thing than the pumpkin ale shot.
I think you can do that without HDR. It can be done with blended
layers I'm pretty sure you can do blended layers in the more recent
versions of Photoshop Elements.
But if you really need HDR software, there's a fairly good program
that's absolutely free. It's called Luminance HDR (used to be
From: Steve Cottrell
On 15/5/13, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
I remember a post last year (2012?) from a list member that he his
girlfriend were driving to Chile in a VW Microbus. But maybe it was an
adios for now - I'll be off list because ... kind of post he didn't
see it.
From: Steve Cottrell
On 14/5/13, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
couldn't resist this - I had taken a walk downdown to the south street
seaport, which is still pretty much not in operation.
Not exactly the first peso after surgery I imagined I'd show but...
Larry's been talking up the 85/1.4 to me off-list for a little while as
an alternative to the pricey 77/1.8 (my holy grail lens). It certainly
looks like a viable alternative, but I'm not sure if it has aperture
control contacts -- something I really would like to have if I'm gong to
use it in
Today I passed 2000 PDML mails in my inbox, and realised I have to pull myself
seriously together to keep up.
To make short work of it all, my thoughts and condolances to Doug Brewer on the
loss of his beloved lens, and a big *yay* for the work Mark Roberts and his
crew has put down on the
On 5/17/13 12:29 PM, AlunFoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:
Today I passed 2000 PDML mails in my inbox, and realised I have to pull myself
seriously together to keep up.
To make short work of it all, my thoughts and condolances to Doug Brewer on the
loss of his beloved lens, and a big *yay* for the
On May 17, 2013, at 11:30 , Walt ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Larry's been talking up the 85/1.4 to me off-list for a little while as an
alternative to the pricey 77/1.8 (my holy grail lens). It certainly looks
like a viable alternative, but I'm not sure if it has aperture control
contacts --
On 5/17/13 12:30 PM, Walt wrote:
Larry's been talking up the 85/1.4 to me off-list for a little while as
an alternative to the pricey 77/1.8 (my holy grail lens). It certainly
looks like a viable alternative, but I'm not sure if it has aperture
control contacts -- something I really would like
On 5/17/2013 11:38 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/Samyang-Manual-Aspherical-Samsung-Cameras/dp/B006MI1XLE/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8qid=1368808502sr=8-7keywords=samyang+85mm+f1.4
Shows NO A setting on the aperture ring.
However:
On 5/17/2013 11:40 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
On 5/17/13 12:30 PM, Walt wrote:
Larry's been talking up the 85/1.4 to me off-list for a little while as
an alternative to the pricey 77/1.8 (my holy grail lens). It certainly
looks like a viable alternative, but I'm not sure if it has aperture
control
On 17/5/13, Walt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Larry's been talking up the 85/1.4 to me off-list for a little while as
an alternative to the pricey 77/1.8 (my holy grail lens). It certainly
looks like a viable alternative, but I'm not sure if it has aperture
control contacts -- something I
On 5/17/13 1:02 PM, Walt wrote:
Thanks, Doug. I'm leaning heavily in that direction, but I'm just about
as mercurial as it gets.
It really is a wonderful lens that summons god rays and an angelic
chorus with every shutter click, isn't it?
-- Walt
yes, and it makes you more attractive.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 06:29:48PM +0200, AlunFoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:
I am in the process of planning a 3 weeks' roadtrip through Sierra Nevada in
October/November. We are two Norwegian Pentaxians travelling together.
Woot! GFM West!
The plans are not very firm yet, but we're coming
On 5/17/2013 12:01 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 17/5/13, Walt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Larry's been talking up the 85/1.4 to me off-list for a little while as
an alternative to the pricey 77/1.8 (my holy grail lens). It certainly
looks like a viable alternative, but I'm not sure if it has
On 17/5/13, AlunFoto - Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am in the process of planning a 3 weeks' roadtrip through Sierra
Nevada in October/November. We are two Norwegian Pentaxians travelling
together.
The plans are not very firm yet, but we're coming through San Francisco.
We plan
On 17/5/13, Steve Cottrell, discombobulated, unleashed:
I assume you're talking about either the A*85/1.4 or its later FA
incarnation?
ahar - in the tradition I have followed since the year dot, I naturally
read the subject line after I responded.
My assertions still stand :-)
--
Cheers,
1. You’re Lazy
2. You’re Preoccupied with Gear
3. You’re Sloppy
4. You Refuse to Edit Your Own Work
http://www.thephoblographer.com/2013/05/16/this-is-why-your-pictures-suck/
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
All of the above recommendations are worth considering. Monument Valley, UT is
worth a detour as well. My feeling is that the south rim of the Grand Canyon
is the preferred choice..
3000K can be covered in the time period, the comfort of doing so simply depends
on how much time is spent with
Walt,
While it's been almost a year since I looked at Samyang 85/1.4,
my conclusion was that all those Korean lenses (under different brand
names) have A setting for the Pentax version.
And the reason the photos on some distributor sites do not show that is
that they are photos of non-Pentax
Can one assume that he just finished reading The Tyranny of Niceness?
gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 1:12 PM
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List
Subject: OT - This is Why Your Pictures Suck
1. You’re
I always find shots that didn't catch my eye when I originally went
through a set of images. This is one from the shoot I did with LeeAnn
the other day that I don't know how I managed to miss.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/8747214838/
K-5, F 50/1.4, f/3.2, ISO 400, 1/50 sec
Thanks, Igor.
I'll take all of that into consideration. I'm still leaning toward the
77/1.8, though I can see myself possibly getting the Samyang and using
the leftover money to invest in other gear that could help my
photography -- lighting, flash, reflectors, etc.
I figure within the next
He certainly pulls no punches. :)
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Gerrit Visser gerrit...@gmail.com wrote:
Can one assume that he just finished reading The Tyranny of Niceness?
gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker
Sent:
Hey, I resemble those remarks!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
1. You’re Lazy
2. You’re Preoccupied with Gear
3. You’re Sloppy
4. You Refuse to Edit Your Own Work
If you still own the mechanical/electrical remote switch for the PZ-1(p), it is
fairly easy to rig it so an old cable release trips the two interior
microswitches sequentially. The rig just replaces the button you would normally
depress with your thumb with the cable release plunger.
On May
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 06:10:29PM +0100, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 17/5/13, AlunFoto - Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
Envious
My old high school i(I was class of 78) is having a mega reunion for
Homestead? Prospect?
classes of the 60s and 70s in August and I would
That is really nice. Love the hay humps.
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 5/15/2013 3:42:07 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
maritim...@gmail.com writes:
This is where I had my lunch today. An hour hiking away from my house.
Just felt like sharing it.
Cool. Thanks!
M aka D
In a message dated 5/17/2013 8:23:25 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com writes:
I think you can do that without HDR. It can be done with blended
layers I'm pretty sure you can do blended layers in the more recent
versions of Photoshop Elements.
But if
You might look into a used M 85mm f2.0, despite not having an A setting
it has several advantages, it's not a lot bigger than a 55 f1.8, it's
not the most sought after Pentax 85mm so you can probably pick one up
from KEH for less than an A 50mm f1.4. Though it's considered a bit
soft wide
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:34:39PM -0500, Walt wrote:
Thanks, Igor.
I'll take all of that into consideration. I'm still leaning toward
the 77/1.8, though I can see myself possibly getting the Samyang and
using the leftover money to invest in other gear that could help
my photography --
The focal length (77 to 85 mm, APS-C 116 to 128 mm) appears to be a
bit odd. Where would one use this focal length on an APS-C camera? I
understand the 50 mm serves well as a Portrait Lens at 75 mm on an
APS-C Body.
And I don't cover indoor sports, where these lenses may be useful -
based on
Yes, PSE10 Photomerge allows HDR with up to 10 images.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: eactiv...@aol.com eactiv...@aol.com
To: pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Nightshot - American Pie II
Cool. Thanks!
M aka D
In a message dated 5/17/2013
Thanks, P.J.
My only quibble with going with the M 85/2.0 is the fact that it would
lack the aperture control contacts, meaning I'd have to take that extra
step of stopping down with the green button when trying to take quick
shots of fleeting moments. While that may be a minor thing on the
From: Walt
I had a small windfall last night in a weekly drawing at the club where
I work which would allow me to get the lens -- which is obviously much
more affordable than the 77/1.8 is. Alternatively, I could sock the
money away and continue saving until I can afford the Real McCoy.
Anybody
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:04:02AM +0530, Bipin Gupta wrote:
The focal length (77 to 85 mm, APS-C 116 to 128 mm) appears to be a
bit odd. Where would one use this focal length on an APS-C camera? I
understand the 50 mm serves well as a Portrait Lens at 75 mm on an
APS-C Body.
I've heard this
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:46:01PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walt
I had a small windfall last night in a weekly drawing at the club where
I work which would allow me to get the lens -- which is obviously much
more affordable than the 77/1.8 is. Alternatively, I could sock the
money
Bipin Gupta bip...@gmail.com wrote:
The focal length (77 to 85 mm, APS-C 116 to 128 mm) appears to be a
bit odd. Where would one use this focal length on an APS-C camera? I
understand the 50 mm serves well as a Portrait Lens at 75 mm on an
APS-C Body.
If portraiture is an odd type of
That focal range is pretty close to ideal for the kind of low-light
environmental/casual portraits I like to take. I enjoy capturing people
in unguarded moments, especially where I work. And that often requires
that I stand off at a distance to keep people from noticing me and going
into
On 5/17/2013 1:19 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Of course, this plan is making the assumption that we are both capable of
selling a working lens.
Aye. There's the rub. I'm like a cat lady, only for lenses.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yeah. Me too almost, but he forgot about procrastination all the other
stuff I'm gotta do as soon as I get a round toit.
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Hey, I resemble those remarks!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Bruce Walker
Hi Rob - that shot and the side altar shots need work. Those will be
easier to clean up than the windows. The windows were the bulk of the
work.
I have enough shots that I can combine them to fix the lighting. The
most difficult part will be deciding what I want it to look like.
GS
George
Thanks everyone. I'm learning a lot from this project. gs
George Sinos
www.GeorgesPhotos.net
www.GeorgeSinos.com
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:11 PM, George Sinos gsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rob - that shot and the side altar shots need work. Those will be
easier to clean up
An 85mm lens on an APS-C digital camera roughly fills the roll of a
135mm lens on a 35mm film camera.
The traditional moderate telephoto focal length on 35mm film cameras was
a 135mm lens. Why 135? I suspect like a lot of things for historical
reasons. 135 was the normal focal length for a
On 5/17/2013 2:46 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walt
I had a small windfall last night in a weekly drawing at the club where
I work which would allow me to get the lens -- which is obviously much
more affordable than the 77/1.8 is. Alternatively, I could sock the
money away and continue saving
Right now my PDML inbox stands at 3477, I'll never catch up.
On 5/17/2013 12:29 PM, AlunFoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:
Today I passed 2000 PDML mails in my inbox, and realised I have to pull myself
seriously together to keep up.
To make short work of it all, my thoughts and condolances to Doug
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Jostein wrote:
I am in the process of planning a 3 weeks' roadtrip through Sierra Nevada in
October/November. We are two Norwegian Pentaxians travelling together.
The plans are not very firm yet, but we're coming through San Francisco. We
plan to go via
I'm *hoping* to get out to Monterey for the World Superbike
Championship race Sept 27-29 at Laguna Seca. Don't know if I'm going
to be able to make it happen...
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Dont forget about the Smc-K 85mm F1.8 which is an exceptionally
good optic ( but it doesnt AF or have the A setting on the aperture dial
if that matters to you). They sell for around $500 on ebay lately.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 01:55:07PM -0500, Walt wrote:
On 5/17/2013 1:19 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Of course, this plan is making the assumption that we are both capable of
selling a working lens.
Aye. There's the rub. I'm like a cat lady, only for lenses.
Mark!
I'm in a similar boat. On
I love my K 85/1.8. The green button kludge doesn't slow me down much.
Paul
On May 17, 2013, at 4:28 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
Dont forget about the Smc-K 85mm F1.8 which is an exceptionally
good optic ( but it doesnt AF or have the A setting on the aperture dial
if that
5. You do not know how to use light.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:57 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Yeah. Me too almost, but he forgot about procrastination all the other
stuff I'm gotta do as soon as I get a round toit.
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Hey, I resemble those remarks!
6. Your subject matter is totally boring.
In a message dated 5/17/2013 3:21:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
pixelsmi...@gmail.com writes:
5. You do not know how to use light.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:57 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
wrote:
Yeah. Me too almost, but he forgot about
7. You aren't shooting with a full frame digital camera.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:25 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
6. Your subject matter is totally boring.
In a message dated 5/17/2013 3:21:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
pixelsmi...@gmail.com writes:
5. You do not know how to use light.
Well, considering it's you, yup, you can do it.
Personally, I was never that impressed by the Grand Canyon -- it's just a
big gorge. Yosemite will give you all the big rock you want. Allow at least
two days for Yosemite if you can -- it will be the highlight of your trip.
l think Utah a
Second Capital Reef. I'd do that and Bryce and skip Zion.
I just bet you'd love slot canyons, Jostein. Here's a web page.
http://www.navajonationparks.org/htm/antelopecanyon2.htm
In a message dated 5/17/2013 9:35:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
d...@alphoto.com writes:
Well, if you're
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 6:41 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Personally, I was never that impressed by the Grand Canyon -- it's just a
big gorge. Yosemite will give you all the big rock you want.
Seconded. I remember sitting at the Grand Canyon with my dad, having
been to Yosemite together a
HAR!!
Paul via phone
On May 17, 2013, at 6:53 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Fucking depressing.
Btw did Shel write that?
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
Sent: May 17, 2013 5/17/13
To: Pentax
G'day Jostein
My family and I are in the middle of a USA roadtrip - just under 3
weeks in and have covered 2200 miles. We're currently in Essex,
Montana having been through 8 states so far. Hope to catch up with
Joe McAllister in Seattle and other PDMLers in San Francisco in a week
or
On 18 May 2013 08:53, knarftheria...@gmail.com knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Fucking depressing.
Maybe, but that's life sometimes.
I'd say it's more accurate than not, I can see myself in described in
there, not 100% but close. What's missing though is the reasons that
it may be so.
No. But IIRC it *is* the guy that Larry was shooting
for (albeit rather briefly) a couple of years ago ...
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:53:54PM +, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Fucking depressing.
Btw did Shel write that?
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce
This seems like a paradigm shift, when it comes to managing images,
not something that would likely suite any serious photographer but may
appeal to the masses:
http://connect.dpreview.com/post/1400574775/hands-on-with-google-plus-photo-update
The main layout has changed and in the photo section
On 5/17/13 8:13 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
This seems like a paradigm shift, when it comes to managing images,
not something that would likely suite any serious photographer but may
appeal to the masses:
http://connect.dpreview.com/post/1400574775/hands-on-with-google-plus-photo-update
The main
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 07:17:18PM -0400, John Francis wrote:
No. But IIRC it *is* the guy that Larry was shooting
for (albeit rather briefly) a couple of years ago ...
Same site, but it was Chris Gampat that was running the site
that I attempted to write for.
--
Larry Colen
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Fucking depressing.
Agreed. Written by someone with a real superiority complex.
That kind of condescending approach never helps anyone improve their
art. It only makes the person espousing it feel good about themselves.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Rob Studdert wrote:
...images are being 'auto-enhanced'
I'll just cut my wrists now...
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
On 18 May 2013 11:00, Postmaster postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Fucking depressing.
Agreed. Written by someone with a real superiority complex.
I don't know, it might actually be about the author?
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870
On 18 May 2013 11:02, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote:
...images are being 'auto-enhanced'
I'll just cut my wrists now...
It's becoming more difficult to use as a photo sharing platform every
day, they are determined to use their prior happy Picaseweb users
On 18 May 2013 04:34, Bipin Gupta bip...@gmail.com wrote:
The focal length (77 to 85 mm, APS-C 116 to 128 mm) appears to be a
bit odd. Where would one use this focal length on an APS-C camera? I
understand the 50 mm serves well as a Portrait Lens at 75 mm on an
APS-C Body.
And I don't cover
On 5/17/13 9:06 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 18 May 2013 11:02, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote:
...images are being 'auto-enhanced'
I'll just cut my wrists now...
It's becoming more difficult to use as a photo sharing platform every
day, they are
On 18 May 2013 11:14, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
I dunno. I seem to be doing okay over there. But I'm a bit of a pig's ear
myself.
I know that's it's working for you and a few others here, that's great
and I try to check out posts there but the many people that I have
discussed it
He writes I am challenged in just finding a pair of matching socks in
the morning.
Why is he obsessed with that? And who said the socks must be always
matching?
http://littlemissmatched.com/catalog/sock-shop
;-)
Igor
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-bounces at pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker
On 5/17/13 9:21 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 18 May 2013 11:14, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
I dunno. I seem to be doing okay over there. But I'm a bit of a pig's ear
myself.
I know that's it's working for you and a few others here, that's great
and I try to check out posts there but
Having been in the drivers and back seat (at different times) of a 308GT4 I
can attest as to why that is :-)
Gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Rob Studdert
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 9:14 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: FA
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:13:43AM +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 18 May 2013 04:34, Bipin Gupta bip...@gmail.com wrote:
Amateurs often have much better equipment than professionals, when was
the last time you saw a professional taxi driver driving a Ferrari? :)
I'm even willing to bet that
I dont know, my tokina 60-120mm f2.8 at-x zoom comes pretty
close to a perfect portrait lens. Works well on aps and should
work well on FF too.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Also, I'd love it if you have suggestions for places to stop by along the
way. :-)
+Be sure to check road conditions through Yosemite over Tioga Pass to Lee
Vining - that road does normally close for the winter due to snow.
+In southern Utah be sure to visit Grand Staircase-Escalante
On 18 May 2013 12:46, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
I dont know, my tokina 60-120mm f2.8 at-x zoom comes pretty
close to a perfect portrait lens. Works well on aps and should
work well on FF too.
Analyzing my recent portrait shots the FL that has delivered my best
shots is my 200mm
5. You do not know how to use light.
6. you do not know how to use light.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT - This is Why Your Pictures Suck
5. You do not know how to use
I wrote off lsit a bit with some suggestions very close to what Ken has
told you.
Robb is another source of good info about that part of the country.
ann
On 5/17/2013 22:50, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Also, I'd love it if you have suggestions for places to stop by along
the way. :-)
+Be
Me Too.
The Grand Canyon is a wonderful place to visit and sit and soak in the
surroundings but leave the camera in the car. Most photographs simply don't
do it justice - it too big!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Matthew
um I clicked on that link and got a porthole -
h
ann
On 5/17/2013 14:14, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
That is really nice. Love the hay humps.
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 5/15/2013 3:42:07 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
maritim...@gmail.com writes:
This is where I had my lunch today. An
My mid 1970's Pentax Kx body, cosmetically imperfect but Eric-ized and
works fine.
I want enough moolah for it to get the print version of the 2013 PDML
Annual . Or if it works better for you because you got a particularly
good price from coupons, send me your paperback copy by media mail and
Forgot to add a must see/stop is the Mobil gas station at the end of the
Tioga Pass road in Lee Vining. You won't believe the food!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: kwal...@peoplepc.com
Subject: Re: Roadtrip California
Also,
That's really nice... I reckon you must have ot get up early to get
shots like that :-0
Mark
On 5/12/2013 7:09 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Another one from last week's dawn/sunrise session down at the Lake:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2013/05/another-sunrise.html?m=1
I like
That's cool...
Mark
On 5/9/2013 4:28 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
add a little weird to your day
https://plus.google.com/115347824062413314605/posts/8yUWU8ng9nL
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
great expression and lighting, Doug. Wonderful!
Mark
On 5/12/2013 9:12 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/115347824062413314605/posts/C5d8QZX6NMm
Still using my K7, this time matched with the SMC-A 50mm f/1.7, handheld.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Excellent!
On 5/16/2013 1:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Another photo from Worldwide Pinhole Photography Day 2013, celebrating
bicyclists ...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/8742233679/lightbox
enjoy!
Godfrey - http://godfreydigiorgi.wordpress.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
great, but how did you get a shutter speed fast enough to stop motion
with such a small aperture (pinhole) setting?
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Mark C
Sent: Saturday, May 18,
97 matches
Mail list logo
