I learned on Wednesday that a childhood friend had passed way suddenly
Tuesday morning, at the age of 57. Cripes - he was only 6 months older
than me! We had had been inseparable in junior high school and high
school, but had pretty much drifted apart in college and the adult years.
As we wer
Another motion blur experiment, more moderate than in my Backfield in
Motion image.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17914065
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/
I just tried opening the URL on Firefox and it opens fine. If I can't
reproduce the problem I'm not sure how to solve it.
On 11/28/2014 9:07 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
The weird thing is I'm using Firefox, not Chrome. I don't understand what
Chrome has to do with it at all.
I thought that you mig
I've been using the Pale Moon variation of FireFox, and it doesn't seem
to have any issues. I don't have Firefox set up on my desktop, but I'll
try it on my development machine and see if I can find the problem. I a
number of browsers installed there for testing.
On 11/28/2014 9:07 PM, Rick
The weird thing is I'm using Firefox, not Chrome. I don't understand what
Chrome has to do with it at all.
I thought that you might have an explanation, as an Information Services
Professional.
Rick
On Nov 28, 2014, at 8:53 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> Apparently Chrome doesn't trust Dropbox. I
Thanks, Rick.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> Nicely caught; it would benefit from some lightening of the shadow area
> though.
>
> Rick
>
> On Nov 28, 2014, at 12:47 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
>> http://phot
Apparently Chrome doesn't trust Dropbox. I have no control, the actual
page is simple HTML with no scripting at all.
On 11/28/2014 8:40 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Peter,
NoScript is blocking this as unsafe--"a potential cross-site scripting attempt
(XSS) from [chrome].
What's up?
Rick
On Nov 2
On my way to work early last week:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17912426&size=lg
(K-5, DA 40/2.8)
Comments appreciated!
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Thank, Rick.
I'm interested that the down marker is a big distraction for you; I
thought it was an essential part of the scene. Obviously, it depends
on your point of view.
The players in "red" are actually in orange and black, the infamous
Princeton Tigers. The
good guys are the ones in white
Nicely caught; it would benefit from some lightening of the shadow area though.
Rick
On Nov 28, 2014, at 12:47 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17913683&size=md
> Comments are invited.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>
Peter,
NoScript is blocking this as unsafe--"a potential cross-site scripting attempt
(XSS) from [chrome].
What's up?
Rick
On Nov 28, 2014, at 5:47 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> A while ago I downloaded the Free DXOMark Optics Pro 8 package and finally
> got around to processing an image with it.
Dan, it's a good idea but it doesn't work for me.
I think you have two things going on here, each of which merits its own pic:
first, the receivers in white headed downfield with the red defensive backs
waiting for them; second, the linesmen colliding while the quarterback waits
for his moment.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:07 PM, John wrote:
> If memory serves, the old Mad Avenue saying was "run it up the flagpole &
> see who salutes."
Yes, that well-known phrase is what I was playing with in my original post.
"I think it would work better if you'd panned with the four players in motion"
Thanks, Godfrey.
I understand your comment and, from an artistic point of view, I tend
to agree with you.
>From a thematic view, however, the image shows what I saw and wanted
to depict. There is no motion blur in the fans or the players and
coaches on the sidelines. There is just a touch of bl
But will it stimulate your aperture?
I have a couple of drawers worth of manual focus glass in a variety of mounts,
so of I was willing to spend $1700 to be able to use several hundred dollars
worth of obsolete lenses without buying film, this might be a good camera for
me.
On November 27, 201
I love the look in her eyes. Nice capture!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:47 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> A while ago I downloaded the Free DXOMark Optics Pro 8 package and finally
> got around to processing an image with it. This was taken
A while ago I downloaded the Free DXOMark Optics Pro 8 package and
finally got around to processing an image with it. This was taken on
Thanksgiving at the extended family get together.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20---%20thesecret.html
Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc
Quoting Igor PDML-StR :
I also had to look up what that Anzac slice were.
As for David's comparison to a biscuit, it depends on what one calls
a biscuit. :-)
I remember that several years ago, on this list, there was a thread
with a list of various culinary items (including biscuits) tha
Quoting Mark C :
Nice shot - love the contrasting colors. I also had to look up
"Anzac slice." Hopefully there were leftovers when it was done.
There were, but as another photo showed the little guy ...er,
defecating on the slice, I decided to forego my snack.
Not sure whether it was jus
On 28 Nov 2014, at 20:08, John wrote:
>
>> On 11/28/2014 8:40 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>> This is an experimental image, attempting to capture the "feeling" of
>> the action at a football (American football, of course) game:
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17913765&size=lg
>>
On 11/28/2014 8:40 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
This is an experimental image, attempting to capture the "feeling" of
the action at a football (American football, of course) game:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17913765&size=lg
I'm not sure how I feel about it, so I am running it up th
That's right a black Friday special of only $999.99 for a camera worth
at most $400 based on it's current Sony sibling being old tech. But
you'll save over $2300.00 Buy two they're small!
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/hasselblad/Ntt/hasselblad+stellar+camera/N/0
--
I don't want to achieve
The trouble with it for me is that there is no center to the motion that draws
my eye and allows me to acquire a gestalt of the action. It seems too random,
with blurred elements against crisp elements not telling a clear story.
Interesting experiment, however. I would try more of it with diffe
Nice shot - love the contrasting colors. I also had to look up "Anzac
slice." Hopefully there were leftovers when it was done.
Mark
On 11/25/2014 6:23 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
G'day all
There I was sitting down yesterday afternoon, cup of coffee in hand
and Kindle open at my bookmarked place
This is an experimental image, attempting to capture the "feeling" of
the action at a football (American football, of course) game:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17913765&size=lg
I'm not sure how I feel about it, so I am running it up the flag pole
to see whether it will draw flames.
D
http://www.budgettravel.com/slideshow/19-funny-travel-signs-from-around-the-world,12578/?src=ssrcrc
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visi
On November 27, 2014 5:21:11 PM EST, Bill wrote:
>On 27/11/2014 10:55 AM, J C OConnell wrote:
>> I dont think the $1500 cameras are for beginners who dont know
>anything
>> about cameras and lenses.
>
>They may not "be for beginners" but beginners buy them in droves. I
>hang
>out ona forum dedica
27 matches
Mail list logo
