Such a delicate little thing. Bird naming conventions differ a lot from
country to country. Robin immediately sprang to mind. Then, what you call a
Robin is actually a Turdus sp. - Thrush family.
Alan c
-Original Message-
From: Ken Waller
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 6:33 PM
To:
Amazing.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 11:43 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peso-Hard Freeze
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
Mind you, every
once in a while you do
That's a valid point. I'm not sure these have no redeeming value, although I
don't like them
Paul via phone
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 10:50 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> Paul -I'm sure you must know I'm not opposed to post processing in general -
> but I think this work is
Paul -I'm sure you must know I'm not opposed to post processing in
general - but I think this work is really quite awful. Post-processing
for its own sake.
We are entering the digital imaging age equivalent to Keane portraitsand
tigers on black velvet, it seems to me.
ann
On 8/3/2016
Post processing isn't sad. It requires skill and artistry. I'm not wild about
this grungy look, but I appreciate the creative process.
Paul via phone
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 10:22 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> Sadly, John - there is a lot of post processing in these
>
> ann
>
Sadly, John - there is a lot of post processing in these
ann
On 8/3/2016 3:33 PM, John wrote:
It's street portraiture, and you don't do it in post. You set up or find
"Rembrandt" type lighting before you make the photo. It also looks like
she's shooting for fairly high contrast, low key
lovely shot - nice expression
is he guarding the divining rod behind him? :-)
ann
On 8/3/2016 12:33 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Taken with a K20D, 300mm f4.5 FA, 400 IS0, 1/180 sec, f 8.0.
Comments appreciated.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18269923
Kenneth Waller
Now that is a comic portrait... makes it look like some alienvisitor
grimacing... Inspired by your visitation from an old Star drek fantoday?
sharp and fun
ann
On 8/3/2016 6:40 PM, Jostein wrote:
Same hoverfly, different optics.
And background. :-)
Should be less taxing on human eyes this
Well done!
But somebody needs their eyes shaved.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Jostein wrote:
> Same hoverfly, different optics.
>
> And background. :-)
> Should be less taxing on human eyes this time.
>
> The portrait angle is from above, to show the three extra ocelli
>
Thank you, Marco.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Marco Alpert wrote:
> Lovely! And subtly dreamlike.
>
> - Marco
>
>> On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> A different take on the orange daylily.
>>
>> I've been trying out different
Wow redux.
m
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Jostein wrote:
>
> Same hoverfly, different optics.
>
> And background. :-)
> Should be less taxing on human eyes this time.
>
> The portrait angle is from above, to show the three extra ocelli (eyespots?).
>
> Mike Wilson has
The technical result is exquisite, the subject not so much. Well done.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein"
Subject: PESO - Another insect portrait
Same hoverfly, different optics.
And background.
That's exactly the way my eyes feel every morning.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 3:40:52 PM
Subject: PESO - Another insect portrait
Same hoverfly, different optics.
And
Superb.
> On 3 Aug 2016, at 23:41, Jostein wrote:
>
> Same hoverfly, different optics.
>
> And background. :-)
> Should be less taxing on human eyes this time.
>
> The portrait angle is from above, to show the three extra ocelli (eyespots?).
>
> Mike Wilson has supplied a
Same hoverfly, different optics.
And background. :-)
Should be less taxing on human eyes this time.
The portrait angle is from above, to show the three extra ocelli
(eyespots?).
Mike Wilson has supplied a box full of old microscope lenses, and I
tried one out tonight; an old English brand,
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Mind you, every
> once in a while you do get a good one:
> http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7d904208.htm
>
That is indeed a very good one!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
Received about 6 blasts of that from my Dr a couple days ago. Happens
a coupe times a year.
He removed a patch of forehead skin
and had it biopsied this past week.
Found Basal Cell Carcinoma.
"Most common and least concerning"
per my Dr. and PLEASE, I don't want
to hear any different. Thanks!
J
They should make the camouflage nets out of hi-viz material so the cows don't
think they're grass and eat them.
B
> On 3 Aug 2016, at 21:12, John wrote:
>
> Same deal with Texas Longhorns on the open range at Ft. Hood. They're
> stupid and they're stubborn. Dumber than
I recommend liquid nitrogen under pressure.
On 8/1/2016 10:48 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
My wife made the decision (of course) to hang a couple Hummingbird feeders.
I've been dinkin' around attempting to freeze them with an AF540-FGZ on the K-3.
I've chosen to use "M" flash setting at 1/64
Would you believe it, John!
Cotty forgot to bring the boiler!
Jostein
Den 03.08.2016 20.54, skrev John:
On 8/2/2016 2:59 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Sorry been a bit quiet on the list recently. Had quick looks at loads of
pics but not even had chance to post comments. We had a new boiler
Same deal with Texas Longhorns on the open range at Ft. Hood. They're
stupid and they're stubborn. Dumber than chickens.
They eat camouflage nets, & they'll lick the CARC (Chemical Agent
Resistant Coating - carcinogen) on a military vehicle down to bare
metal in just a few minutes.
Both of
It's street portraiture, and you don't do it in post. You set up or find
"Rembrandt" type lighting before you make the photo. It also looks like
she's shooting for fairly high contrast, low key lighting.
On 8/2/2016 4:33 PM, Gonz wrote:
I've seen several galleries like this, where they have a
A friend of mine uses a set-up where he closes off the holes in the
feeder and has a couple of realistic looking silk flowers with hidden
tubes leading up through the stem. The bird actually feeds from the
tube, but the silk flower petals conceal it. A couple of additional
"leafy branches" add to
On 8/2/2016 2:59 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Sorry been a bit quiet on the list recently. Had quick looks at loads of
pics but not even had chance to post comments. We had a new boiler
(furnace) installed so 1 week of hell. And work has gone mental, so too
many hours holding a big camera on
Thanks, Bruce.
m
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> Well seen, Marco. Love the subtle humour in it. :)
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Marco Alpert wrote:
>> http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo16/peso10.html
>>
>> Comments, as
Lovely! And subtly dreamlike.
- Marco
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> A different take on the orange daylily.
>
> I've been trying out different subjects and light with a 6x7 120mm
> f:3.5 soft focus lens on the 645z. This is a flower in the full
Quality image, Bruce!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> Well seen, Marco. Love the subtle humour in it. :)
>
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Marco Alpert wrote:
>>
That K20 always delivered!
Like the texture, Ken.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Very nice. A lovely composition.
>
> Paul via phone
>
>> On Aug 3, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>
>> Taken
Very nice. A lovely composition.
Paul via phone
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Taken with a K20D, 300mm f4.5 FA, 400 IS0, 1/180 sec, f 8.0.
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18269923
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
Taken with a K20D, 300mm f4.5 FA, 400 IS0, 1/180 sec, f 8.0.
Comments appreciated.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18269923
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Well seen, Marco. Love the subtle humour in it. :)
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Marco Alpert wrote:
> http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo16/peso10.html
>
> Comments, as always, welcomed.
>
> -Marco
>
> ---
> http://www.alpert.com/marco
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss
A different take on the orange daylily.
I've been trying out different subjects and light with a 6x7 120mm
f:3.5 soft focus lens on the 645z. This is a flower in the full sun in
the middle of my backyard, at f:4.0. Fairly pronounced soft diffusion
effect.
Thanks Ann, Jack, John, and Dan for the comments. Much appreciated.
- Marco
> On Aug 2, 2016, at 4:45 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> I love it. His posture certainly makes the image.
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
> On Tue,
Thats very nice Bill. So a 1/8 exposure actually takes 1/2 second? I
thought the 4 shifts happened within the 1/8 timeframe, or whatever your
shutter speed is. Good to know.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Bill wrote:
> It's been a while since I posted
Very lovely and detailed, Bill.
Sorry if I'm being dense, but should I assume that you were varying
the focus point during the shooting?
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Bill wrote:
> It's been a while since I posted anything, so for better or worse, here's
>
Yeah I figured that was what you intended but the idea gets lost when it
isn't so interesting visually... especially after the excellent
composition of the first...
Here's hoping you get more overcast days too :-)
ann
On 8/3/2016 1:11 AM, Alan C wrote:
You know, I did think of that but I
You nailed it. Very nice.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Bill
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 5:25 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Day Lily
It's been a while since I posted anything, so for better or worse,
here's something.
Technical:
K1, DFA100mm f/2.8 macro,
Base
stunning
Dave
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Bill wrote:
> It's been a while since I posted anything, so for better or worse, here's
> something.
>
> Technical:
> K1, DFA100mm f/2.8 macro,
> Base exposure f/5.6 for 1/8 second at ISO100.
> 22 exposure stack, shot
They tend to roam freely here too with so many broken fences. I had the
misfortune to hit one at night, but fortunately only with a glancing blow.
Mostly, the owners of the cattle are non-existent. Hippos are now a big
problem with the drought. Three dead hippos & one dead driver locally so
You should visit Norfolk Island. Cows there roam freely and have right of way
on the roads. If you hit one you get to pay for it to be butchered but you
don't get the meat.
Really liked the first photo BTW.
Cheers,
Dave
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 5:11 PM, Alan C wrote:
>
> You
40 matches
Mail list logo