Thanks, Alan! Yes, he is tolerating
his admiring public. :)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 22, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Alan C wrote:
>
> A good catch, Jack. The one on the left has a rather condescending expression.
>
> Alan C
>
> -Original Message- From: Jack Davis
> Sent: Sunday, Januar
Bipin,
Is there some point to this post? I'm mystified.
G
> On Jan 22, 2017, at 10:44 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
>
> 70 Years or more ago Zeiss and the Germans made good lenses - perhaps
> the best - as there were no others making lenses then!!??
> The Russians and the Japanese stepped in to sl
Takin’ my life in my hands here. Don’t post much. Rarely post photos. And this
is a little overboard number of images-wise. I beg your forgiveness on that.
And for those who may take offense, my intent is not to offend. Comments on the
photography, of individual images or the collection, greatl
Politically, it looks like you spent Saturday in Atlanta the same way I did
in St. Paul. Photo-wise, I would say it reminds me a lot of my days with
Pentax. Missed focus everywhere... :-(
There are some fun ones there, but a crap-ton are spoiled by motion blur or
focus not being anywhere near th
I'll "rain" whenever I please, thank you!!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 8:19 AM, Charles Robinson
> wrote:
>
> Politically, it looks like you spent Saturday in Atlanta the same way I did
> in St. Paul. Photo-wise, I would say it reminds me a lot of my days with
> Pentax. Miss
I didn't get as many good images here in Raleigh, but I'll be posting
some soon.
On 1/23/2017 10:23 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
Takin’ my life in my hands here. Don’t post much. Rarely post photos.
And this is a little overboard number of images-wise. I beg your
forgiveness on that. And for those who
Sorry Godfrey for mystifying you.
The last line is pretty clear "go ahead and buy a Zeiss Lens for $
when you can buy
similar or better ones for much less".
Someone was expounding the Zeiss Lens for Pentax DSLRs. No doubt Zeiss
make great
lenses. But all I was saying is that you can buy just
Which is going to be worth more in 10 years? Plastic samyang lenses or
bulletproof metal and glass zeiss ZK glass? Zeiss is a good investment
no matter what.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
> Sorry Godfrey for mystifying you.
>
> The last line is pretty clear "go ahead and bu
Hmm. Well, what is your personal experience in proof of this allegation? I have
used Pentax lenses extensively, as well as lenses from Nikon, Olympus, Canon,
and Panasonic amongst others, as well as a number of both Leica and Zeiss
lenses.
My experience shows me that: Regardless of manufacture
Nicely done. You have a good camera.
Chris
On 22 January 2017 at 20:25, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> http://www.web-options.com/TateJan17/
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link direct
Very nice collection Bob, you have quite the eye for this.
I really like 548.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Mitchell"
Subject: Re: Classicism, (Post-)Modernism and the Genius of Evil
Nicely done. You have a good ca
Thanks. And thanks everyone else for comments.
However I won't be awarding any post-modernism points this time round because
none of you pointed out the self-referencing, or the questioning of the gaze,
or the mise-en-abyme implied by the apparent 35mm film strip in this one:
http://www.web-opti
On 23/1/17, Zos Xavius, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Which is going to be worth more in 10 years? Plastic samyang lenses or
>bulletproof metal and glass zeiss ZK glass? Zeiss is a good investment
>no matter what.
I agree.
But I would point out that my Samyang 12/2 is not made of plastic.
--
On 23/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>Takin' my life in my hands here. Don't post much. Rarely post photos.
>And this is a little overboard number of images-wise. I beg your
>forgiveness on that. And for those who may take offense, my intent is
>not to offend. Comments on the photo
Nice set. Love the first few fog pics.
Paul
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
> Thanks. And thanks everyone else for comments.
>
> However I won't be awarding any post-modernism points this time round because
> none of you pointed out the self-referencing, or the questioning o
Life magazine is supposed to have advised its photographers that a photo essay
needs most of the following types of shot to be effective:
Shooting plan
1. Intro / overall
2. Medium - one activity or group
3. Close-up / detail
4. Portrait
5. Interaction
6. Signature - summarise / decisive moment
Thanks Paul.
B
> On 23 Jan 2017, at 19:49, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Nice set. Love the first few fog pics.
> Paul
>>
>>
>> On 22 January 2017 at 20:25, Bob W-PDML
>> mailto:p...@web-options.com>> wrote:
>> http://www.web-options.com/TateJan17/
>>
>>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDM
Fair enough. :)
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 23/1/17, Zos Xavius, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Which is going to be worth more in 10 years? Plastic samyang lenses or
>>bulletproof metal and glass zeiss ZK glass? Zeiss is a good investment
>>no matter what.
>
> I
Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 23/1/17, Zos Xavius, discombobulated, unleashed:
Which is going to be worth more in 10 years? Plastic samyang lenses or
bulletproof metal and glass zeiss ZK glass? Zeiss is a good investment
no matter what.
I agree.
But I would point out that my Samyang 12/2 is not
Nice pair!
Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks, Alan! Yes, he is tolerating
his admiring public. :)
J
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Alan C wrote:
A good catch, Jack. The one on the left has a rather condescending expression.
Alan C
-Original Message- From: Jack Davis
Sen
Eric Weir wrote:
Takin’ my life in my hands here. Don’t post much. Rarely post photos.
And this is a little overboard number of images-wise. I beg your
forgiveness on that. And for those who may take offense, my intent is
not to offend. Comments on the photography, of individual images or
the c
Appreciated, Larry!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 2:15 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Nice pair!
>
> Jack Davis wrote:
>> Thanks, Alan! Yes, he is tolerating
>> his admiring public. :)
>>
>> J
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Jan 22, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Alan C wrote:
>>>
>>>
Leitz on a Leica, not Zeiss.
regards, Anthony
On 24 January 2017 at 01:30, Godfrey DiGiorgi
wrote:
> Bipin,
>
> Is there some point to this post? I'm mystified.
>
> G
>
>
> > On Jan 22, 2017, at 10:44 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
> >
> > 70 Years or more ago Zeiss and the Germans made good lenses -
Taken with
Pentax K5 with Zeiss ZS 50mm f1.4 T*
https://flic.kr/p/LWcBnk
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 23/1/17 3:35 am, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 22/1/17, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
KEH.com has a ZK 50mm f1.4 T* for a not outrageous price. "A" mount
equiva
Many moons ago my internet provider's domain was briefly listed on a
dodgily curated South American blacklist, probably because a few of its
subscribers fell for a trojan and started relaying spam. Like 'that' never
happened to any other domains (cough, cough, AOL, Yahoo, et al.). As a
consequence
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 5:24 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> No matter what side of the issue you are on, it was a very newsworthy event.
> You got some good photos, and a lot that could be better.
Thanks to all who responded. I recognize that it’s a mixed bag, e.g., the
obviously blurry images—I th
Still in the Alfama district of Lisbon:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18333422&size=lg
(K-5, DA 16-45)
Comments appreciated.
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link direc
> On 22 Jan 2017, at 16:36, Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
> On 22/1/17, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> KEH.com has a ZK 50mm f1.4 T* for a not outrageous price. "A" mount
>> equivalent. I'd buy it but I'm broke at the moment.
>
> How do you think it compares optically to the Pent
Very nice and atmospheric. I was expecting some sort of Portuguese band, the
equivalent of Metallica, not heavy metal exactly, more like heavy terracotta.
> On 24 Jan 2017, at 00:54, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> Still in the Alfama district of Lisbon:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18333
Welcome back Anthony. It's been too long. Hope your heath issues have
been resolved.
Cheers
Brian
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017, at 11:06 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
> Many moons ago my internet provider's domain was briefly listed on a
> dodgily curated South American blacklist, probably because a few
Ditto that.. Hi anthony!
ann
On 1/23/2017 9:00 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Welcome back Anthony. It's been too long. Hope your heath issues have
been resolved.
Cheers
Brian
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017, at 11:06 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
Many moons ago my internet provider's domain was briefly liste
Yup.. thet's my fave from your Portugal set :-)
ann
On 1/23/2017 7:53 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Still in the Alfama district of Lisbon:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18333422&size=lg
(K-5, DA 16-45)
Comments appreciated.
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://
Excellent! Welcome home!
Paul via phone
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 10:44 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> Ditto that.. Hi anthony!
> ann
>
>> On 1/23/2017 9:00 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
>> Welcome back Anthony. It's been too long. Hope your heath issues have
>> been resolved.
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> B
Whatever.
On 1/23/2017 2:25 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Thanks. And thanks everyone else for comments.
However I won't be awarding any post-modernism points this time round because
none of you pointed out the self-referencing, or the questioning of the gaze,
or the mise-en-abyme implied by the appa
... and this one has sprocket holes too.
On 1/24/2017 12:07 AM, John wrote:
Whatever.
On 1/23/2017 2:25 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Thanks. And thanks everyone else for comments.
However I won't be awarding any post-modernism points this time round
because none of you pointed out the self-referenci
If you say so. I get a different impression!
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Jack Davis
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 2:25 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peso-Red-tailed Pair
Thanks, Alan! Yes, he is tolerating
his admiring public. :)
J
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 2
Comet 45P was supposed to be "visible" next to the new moon on New Years
Eve. Our forecast called for rain, but it was clear on the 30th, so I
headed out to see if I could find it a day early. No luck, but I got
images of the almost new moon when it was just a sliver.
K-1 @ ISO 6400; Sigma 300 f/
Very nice, John. I scanned that area with my 10x50's & couldn't find it
either.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: John
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: By the light of the slivery moon
Comet 45P was supposed to be "visible" next to the n
That's really nice.
Cheers,
Dave
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 6:33 PM, John wrote:
>
> Comet 45P was supposed to be "visible" next to the new moon on New Years
> Eve. Our forecast called for rain, but it was clear on the 30th, so I
> headed out to see if I could find it a day early. No luck, but I got
One can't disagree with you Zos especially if one had pots of money or
were a PRO or were an old fart like me.
But foot in mouth, may I add that in todays use and throw world -
repairs difficult & expensive - plastics are just as good as metal.
In fact space age plastics are stronger than steel -
John wrote:
Comet 45P was supposed to be "visible" next to the new moon on New Years
Eve. Our forecast called for rain, but it was clear on the 30th, so I
headed out to see if I could find it a day early. No luck, but I got
images of the almost new moon when it was just a sliver.
K-1 @ ISO 640
41 matches
Mail list logo
