> On Apr 15, 2022, at 2:24 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
> Larry,
>
> You are probably right about the light coming from the background.
> What I am not understanding completely is why all the aperture
> images are perfectly aligned along a straight line.
>
> If my assumption is correct that
Larry,
You are probably right about the light coming from the background.
What I am not understanding completely is why all the aperture
images are perfectly aligned along a straight line.
If my assumption is correct that it is a SR that creates
that motion, projecting this aperture images ont
> On Apr 15, 2022, at 11:15 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
> I thought some people here might find this curious:
> It is interesting to see 5[!] images of the aperture.
> Pentax D FA 100 mm F2.8 Macro (not "WR") @ f/5.6
> (The lens has 9 elements in 8 groups.)
> Some other images from this setti
I thought some people here might find this curious:
It is interesting to see 5[!] images of the aperture.
Pentax D FA 100 mm F2.8 Macro (not "WR") @ f/5.6
(The lens has 9 elements in 8 groups.)
Some other images from this setting showed only 4.
Never mind the central part of the photo - this is
> On Apr 15, 2022, at 12:06 AM, John Francis wrote:
>
>
> you know, I might have one of those (and a K-mount to u4/3 adapter) lying
> around.
> I've definitely got an A50mm/f1.4, an A50mm/f1.7, and an M28mm/f2.8; I'm just
> not
> entirely sure whether or not I hung on to an M50mm/1.4 to keep
you know, I might have one of those (and a K-mount to u4/3 adapter) lying
around.
I've definitely got an A50mm/f1.4, an A50mm/f1.7, and an M28mm/f2.8; I'm just
not
entirely sure whether or not I hung on to an M50mm/1.4 to keep my MX company.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:18:44PM +0100, Steve Cot
6 matches
Mail list logo
