Hi all,
I have a question about The Ricoh XR Rikenon 1.4/50mm I bought at e**y.
How is this lens compared to a Pentax? I can't compare it to my SMC Takumar
1.4/50 because that one is so yellow I can only use it for B&W.
Any opinions over here. Mechanical I think is less than the Pentax, but
optica
Hi All,
I'm offered a Pentax ESII, it looks to be working fine, with 1.8/55, 3.5/28
(with original hood) and 3.5/135 (with hood, All Super Multi Coated
Takumars. The ask 110 Euro's. Is there anything special to look out for with
this old stuff?? I think the price is not to high, or am I wrong?
R
Hi All
I just acquired a 4/17mm Fish-eye Takumar.
And I have some questions.
Are there some thing to look for? It looks very nice, near mint, everything
is operating smoothly and the caps are there.
Any comments on that lens. How is it compared to the 16mm Zenitar (I have
one in K-mount)?
What's
The mount on the russian lens is sort of fixed T-2 adapter, if your are
talking about a MTO (The Rubinar has a fixed mount and can be bought in
K-mount, but has a lesser build quality). So you can change the mount with
some precision screwdrivers. Be aware the a 600 and a 1000mm are completely
diff
I know now that the Horizon is no Leica for build quality but I will get one
new with a 3 year warranty. Also A Field camera will be to expensive and to
rare to be found over here. So thanks for the comments.
Don't forget that Ukranian and Russian camera's are a lot cheaper over here
then in the US
Honeywell used the name for a 1250mm mirror optic for Exacta.
Also a dirt cheap, and in noway deserving the brand name, series of Rollei
110 cartridge cameras used a lumitar lens. These were made by Tudor in
Japan.
I don't mean the Rollei A110 and E110, those where real Rollei-cameras with
Zeiss le
Hi All
Mayby a bit off topic. I'm considering a Horizon 202 camera. Does anyone
here has any experience with one of these Russian panoramic cameras?
A longtime Pentax User (over 22 years now)
Hi All,
Does anyone have any experience with the 2.5/28mm (not 2.8) Panagor
wideangle (62mm filter, it is multicoated. I think it was made by Kino
Precision Optics and also marketed as Vivitar (series 1?)
I can buy one, mechanical its feel very nice, but I don't have the time this
moment to fi
riginal Message -----
From: "E. van Ginkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:22 PM
Subject: RE: Pentax K-primes
> Hi,
>
> I understand I have got them cheap. Pentax secondhand-prices are lower in
>
Wayne,
You can use it but only on lenses which are designed for the same distance
between mount and film-plane. If you want to use lenses designed for
rangefindercamera's also beware of the controlcam of the lens (it interfaces
with the rangefinder in the correct camera) it could touch the mirror
Hello,
No there's no K- to 39mm adapter, there is howeven a 39mm to 42mm adapter
and of course the K to 42 screwmount. The use of 39mm lenses on a K-body is
very very very limited, there are some, now very old, russian lenses you can
use, they were made for the first Zenit SLR's, those are the on
Yes you can mount nearly all M42 lenses on those Fujicas , the only catch is
you can't use the later Fujinon screwmount lenses on other cameras because
the open-metering lug interferes with the flange on the body of non-fujica
camera. (It's an indexing lug very much like Nikon's AI system)
There's
ns
the Chinon CM3 or the Fujica ST801 gets the deal.
PS. Don't use Fujinon lenses on non Fujica camera's because the linkage for
Open Aperture measuring are on the backside of the F-stop-ring, like Nikon
AI lenses.
E. van Ginkel
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'
ybe a
bit too Windows 3.1-ish. The PC the scanner is connected to is a 1GHz AMD
Thunderbird with 512mb of memory, so thats is not the one which slows it
down.
E. van Ginkel
- Original Message -
From: "Frantisek Vlcek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Engel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tim Engel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: K2
> 13 Nov 01, E. van Ginkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Hello,
I just bought a Black Asahi Pentax K2 for the equivalent of 100us$.
The body has some brassing at the corners, but seems to work fine.
Questions:
Is this a good deal?
Does anyone have a manual to download for me?
When were these camera made?
Thanks
René van Ginkel
-
This message is
I have one which I rarely use nowaday.
There are indeed two parts, one is the viewer. You have to work on slidefilm
(chromes). You have to screw the camera part in front of the lens, like a
filter. The part is intended to be used with a 50 or 55 mm standardlens. You
get to vertical oriented pictur
I have a Peleng, the lens is sharp but suffers a lot from internal
reflections which are giving light rings on the outside of the picture
circle. Its not flare but something different. The picture circle is a bit
larger then the short side of a negative or slide (about 25 mm). The lens is
cheap i
It's an YS-scew-mount adaptor. You can use the lens as a standard m42-lens.
I believe the YS-adaptor is a Sigma thing of the late 70's.
I to have a YS-lens. A 100mm 2.8 Sigma Macro
René van Ginkel
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May
19 matches
Mail list logo